ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Lt.Arclight · 13 August 2012, 07:43 AM

Having serviced and worked on PO's with after sale issues, I am comfortable offering this advice. RUN-don't walk away from OMEGA!

Buy the Rolex. Rolex service is second to none-expensive but it will be done right. The PO's I worked on,most had made at least 1 trip to Omega service.

Bottom line for a sport watch-the Rolex movement is WAY better. The only other manufacturer that I would recommend would be IWC. Just my 2 cents.

kymwatchlog · 13 August 2012, 08:51 AM

PO is more versatile imo.

MG may be an acquired taste and style.

gwalker · 13 August 2012, 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by outlaw468

If we are talking PO 8500, I vote PO hands down.

X10000. Better movement. If the 2500 I'd lean GV but a tough choice.

Linzjnr · 13 August 2012, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by floater156

I really like Omega, but I'd probably lean towards the GV.

X2 new Omegas are nice but GV for me

caryyee · 13 August 2012, 02:01 PM

GV. I'm biased though, this is a Rolex forum, and I like Rolex's!

Bucky · 14 August 2012, 05:52 AM

Thanks for all the comments and suggestions..still not sure though..need to think it over a little more..like the comments said they are two completely different types of watch..do not really need a dress watch and feel the Milgauss is more sporty then dressy. also with the green crystal it seems more casual..but hey thats only my opinion and i'm sure there are TRF members that will disagree.
if any one has pics of the two watches side by side for comparison that would be great.

Time2time · 14 August 2012, 02:27 PM

GV but I am biased.
You won't regret it.

InTime · 14 August 2012, 02:46 PM

i tried on the GV first, wanted it for the longest time, then bought a 2500 PO.

the PO grew on me and now i no longer want the GV... it was a money factor for me.

i still go the dealer and check out the non GV ones once in awhile. i really want to try on the GV again sometime.

two completely diff watches. i wish the 8500 wasnt as tall.

Hairdude1 · 14 August 2012, 02:49 PM

Gv

ssmui · 14 August 2012, 03:56 PM

PO with 8500.

The Waddler · 14 August 2012, 03:57 PM

Planet Ocean for me

Singslinger · 14 August 2012, 07:06 PM

I own both, although my PO 8500 has the silver numerals.

The Omega has a better power reserve (60 hours) versus around 42 for the GV. It has a display caseback and goes deeper (2000 ft vs 300 ft). Overall, a more rugged and sporty watch. But I think if you're after a dressy watch, then the GV.

Feras · 14 August 2012, 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sam philip

gv

x2

How · 14 August 2012, 07:54 PM

As much as I love the PO (I own two myself), you already have a diver watch in the Sub.

So, go for the GV and add versatility (as well as another Rolex!) to your collection.

Adam K. · 14 August 2012, 07:54 PM

I'd get the Milgauss, hands down. I like the style of it more, trust its movement more, prefer the independent brand status of Rolex and would rather be backed up by the service network that Rolex has established, compared to that of the Swatch Group.

Just in case you wanted a rationale.

But only you can choose what watch needs to be on your wrist.

AH0RSEY · 14 August 2012, 08:10 PM

do you want PCL's and a more dressy watch? if yes then the Milguass, if not well personally I'm not sure I'd chose the PO given what you already have, why not try something like an Explorer I or II? just my two cents

Puffy · 14 August 2012, 09:09 PM

Po

kxux · 14 August 2012, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by How

As much as I love the PO (I own two myself), you already have a diver watch in the Sub.

So, go for the GV and add versatility (as well as another Rolex!) to your collection.

+1 What he said.

wuyeah · 15 August 2012, 02:33 PM

GV for uniqueness.
Green Crystal, Bolt hands, two color markers, Duo lum, matte dial, anit-magnetic. You don't find these design feature across Rolex line-up. Plus, you don't bump into someone who sport a Milgauss daily.

I like PO but PO is just too common....

red1108nyc · 15 August 2012, 03:17 PM

GV

kenhiraihnl · 15 August 2012, 05:50 PM

The GV is totally different from a PO or Sub...

speedo · 15 August 2012, 06:16 PM

the gv would really complement your current watches. you already have a diver, a gmt, now its time for a dressier model and the gv looks fabulous with a suit.
i am really not a fan of the po line. it will look outdated and old in few years and i am not convinced by this coaxial gimmick.

Feras · 15 August 2012, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watchstuff

go milgaus, you already have a dive watch.

x2

Billythekid · 15 August 2012, 11:48 PM

Try finding a liquid metal po 42mm , you wont regret it

mws222 · 15 August 2012, 11:51 PM

GV since you already have a diver.

goog53 · 15 August 2012, 11:54 PM

GV by a long shot

Ricogreen · 16 August 2012, 01:23 PM

Hello Everyone, I'm new here and must say that I really love the look of the GV over the Seamaster. There is just something about that Green Crystal!

FeelingTheBlues · 16 August 2012, 01:32 PM

Both are nice watches but the PO is a tad too big for me, therefore I'd go with the GV. Besides, it would make quite an unique watch that would pop out more in your collection.

14 August 2012, 08:10 PM	#46
AH0RSEY "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: Steve Location: Harrogate Watch: OUT !!!! Posts: 829	do you want PCL's and a more dressy watch? if yes then the Milguass, if not well personally I'm not sure I'd chose the PO given what you already have, why not try something like an Explorer I or II? just my two cents __________________ Current rotation; AP15500ST grey, White Daytona 116500, WG Black/Red Daytona 116509, White and Black EXP 42, GMT2C.... too many previous it makes my head hurt thinking about them.

14 August 2012, 09:09 PM	#47
Puffy "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Here and there Posts: 12,485	Po __________________ Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten

15 August 2012, 03:17 PM	#50
red1108nyc 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Real Name: Fred Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area Watch: Rolex Posts: 8,505	easy for ME GV

15 August 2012, 06:16 PM	#52
speedo "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: bp, hu, eu Watch: dj 16234, 116610ln Posts: 2,376	the gv would really complement your current watches. you already have a diver, a gmt, now its time for a dressier model and the gv looks fabulous with a suit. i am really not a fan of the po line. it will look outdated and old in few years and i am not convinced by this coaxial gimmick. __________________ *16234 jubilee dial, 116610 ln, grand seiko sbgm221g, omega speedmaster mark II, longines legend diver, breguet 3910, nomos club campus 38, swatch sistem51, mares nemo, seiko ripley, g-shock rangeman* instagram: modus_horologicus

16 August 2012, 01:32 PM	#58
FeelingTheBlues "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Carl Location: Always moving Watch: If you wish... Posts: 22,039	Both are nice watches but the PO is a tad too big for me, therefore I'd go with the GV. Besides, it would make quite an unique watch that would pop out more in your collection. __________________ Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir, Le général de l'armée de terre s'attend au pire, J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout, On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout. - André Fortin

13 August 2012, 07:43 AM	#31
Lt.Arclight "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: Todd Location: New Jersey Watch: Explorer 214270 Posts: 104	Having serviced and worked on PO's with after sale issues, I am comfortable offering this advice. RUN-don't walk away from OMEGA! Buy the Rolex. Rolex service is second to none-expensive but it will be done right. The PO's I worked on,most had made at least 1 trip to Omega service. Bottom line for a sport watch-the Rolex movement is WAY better. The only other manufacturer that I would recommend would be IWC. Just my 2 cents.

13 August 2012, 08:51 AM	#32
kymwatchlog Banned Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: US Posts: 853	PO is more versatile imo. MG may be an acquired taste and style.

13 August 2012, 02:01 PM	#35
caryyee "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Real Name: A Location: Austin, TX Posts: 2,180	GV. I'm biased though, this is a Rolex forum, and I like Rolex's!

14 August 2012, 05:52 AM	#36
Bucky "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: UK Posts: 595	Thanks for all the comments and suggestions..still not sure though..need to think it over a little more..like the comments said they are two completely different types of watch..do not really need a dress watch and feel the Milgauss is more sporty then dressy. also with the green crystal it seems more casual..but hey thats only my opinion and i'm sure there are TRF members that will disagree. if any one has pics of the two watches side by side for comparison that would be great.

14 August 2012, 02:27 PM	#37
Time2time Banned Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: U.K Watch: Milgauss GV, Sub-C Posts: 2,178	GV but I am biased. You won't regret it.

14 August 2012, 02:46 PM	#38
InTime Banned Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: BermudaAntarctica Posts: 892	i tried on the GV first, wanted it for the longest time, then bought a 2500 PO. the PO grew on me and now i no longer want the GV... it was a money factor for me. i still go the dealer and check out the non GV ones once in awhile. i really want to try on the GV again sometime. two completely diff watches. i wish the 8500 wasnt as tall.

14 August 2012, 02:49 PM	#39
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156	Gv

14 August 2012, 03:56 PM	#40
ssmui "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Malaysia Posts: 79	PO with 8500.

14 August 2012, 03:57 PM	#41
The Waddler Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Alex Location: Back in London Watch: GMT IIc Posts: 380	Planet Ocean for me

14 August 2012, 07:06 PM	#42
Singslinger "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: singapore Posts: 6,424	I own both, although my PO 8500 has the silver numerals. The Omega has a better power reserve (60 hours) versus around 42 for the GV. It has a display caseback and goes deeper (2000 ft vs 300 ft). Overall, a more rugged and sporty watch. But I think if you're after a dressy watch, then the GV.

14 August 2012, 07:54 PM	#44
How "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Melbourne Watch: 16610, Tudor 1960 Posts: 1,554	As much as I love the PO (I own two myself), you already have a diver watch in the Sub. So, go for the GV and add versatility (as well as another Rolex!) to your collection.

14 August 2012, 07:54 PM	#45
Adam K. Banned Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: WA Watch: All the Oysters Posts: 811	I'd get the Milgauss, hands down. I like the style of it more, trust its movement more, prefer the independent brand status of Rolex and would rather be backed up by the service network that Rolex has established, compared to that of the Swatch Group. Just in case you wanted a rationale. But only you can choose what watch needs to be on your wrist.

15 August 2012, 02:33 PM	#49
wuyeah "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: NYC Posts: 952	GV for uniqueness. Green Crystal, Bolt hands, two color markers, Duo lum, matte dial, anit-magnetic. You don't find these design feature across Rolex line-up. Plus, you don't bump into someone who sport a Milgauss daily. I like PO but PO is just too common....

15 August 2012, 11:48 PM	#54
Billythekid "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: India Posts: 324	Try finding a liquid metal po 42mm , you wont regret it

15 August 2012, 11:51 PM	#55
mws222 Banned Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Nowhere Posts: 2,103	GV since you already have a diver.

15 August 2012, 11:54 PM	#56
goog53 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Mike G Location: Ohio Watch: Rolex-Patek-AP Posts: 3,060	GV by a long shot

16 August 2012, 01:23 PM	#57
Ricogreen "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Toronto Watch: TT DJ2 Posts: 30	Hello Everyone, I'm new here and must say that I really love the look of the GV over the Seamaster. There is just something about that Green Crystal!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)