![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 47
|
Good information. Wonder when Rolex made the change?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: WatchULookinAt
Location: US
Posts: 564
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sweden
Posts: 782
|
Quote:
Im looking at my new SubC 116613 now and it seem while the 2nd Picture seem to match my glidelock. However the 1st Picture my SubC glidelock seem to be of the "1st" version glidelock, I Think it has something to do with the fact that its a twotone glidelock. Anyone with the new SubC 116613 can confirm? EDIT: nevermind, found my answer here on the 5th post from Duey: http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=393429
__________________
Submariner 116613 "Flat" First serial "V" 116610V Hulk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Taiwan
Watch: Rolex BLNR
Posts: 2,308
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Pittsburgh Dad
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Watch: '66 Submariner
Posts: 1,121
|
So is there only 1 generation of glide lock on the DSSD? No re-engineering on the DSSD?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.