The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Watch Reviews (Non-Rolex)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 May 2022, 12:02 AM   #1
Michael T
2024 Pledge Member
 
Michael T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,147
Cartier Tank Louis XL, reference W1560003 review

This review is of the Cartier Tank Louis XL, reference W1560003. The case is 30 millimeters wide and 39.2 millimeters tall, and 8.3 millimeters thick. I am unclear when it was in the catalog, but approximately 2010 to 2018. It had an MSRP of $22,400 late in the run.

The current large Tank Louis Cartier Large is a more modest 25.5 millimeters by 33.7 millimeters and is generally thought of as a women’s size. When I looked for a Cartier Tank XL in rose gold, in a larger size with the pleasing 3:4 aspect ratio, other than the Collection Privée Cartier Paris (CPCP) collection which ran from 1998 to 2008 (of which only 200 rose gold were made beginning in 2006 and virtually impossible to find), this was the best choice for me.

There was a later rose gold Louis Cartier Tank Extra-flat, ref W1560017, which is 35 millimeters wide and 40 millimeters tall, with a 5.1 millimeter thick case size, with no date and a white-cream, no guilloche dial. The Cartier Tank MC is currently available in rose gold, but also had the wider profile at 34 millimeters by 44 millimeters. Both of these options looked too square in shape to me.

There was the now discontinued yellow gold Tank Solo in a 31 millimeter by 41 millimeter size, with flat brancards and a smaller synthetic cabochon. It also had a steel case back. It did not have a guilloche dial, just silver-white. It strayed from the classic Louis Cartier Tank DNA a bit.

My reference W1560003 has a manual wind caliber 9753 MC, which is based on the Piaget 430P, with a 43-hour power reserve. The guilloche dial includes a date aperture and a 40-hour power reserve indicator.

While in a perfect world I would like to locate the extremely rare CPCP version introduced in 2006, my reference W1560003 has the same ideal case size (30 millimeters x 39.2 millimeters, but 2.2 millimeters thicker) and has a Cartier rose gold deployant clasp. The crystal is slightly domed. It originally had a brown strap, but mine has a new matt black Camille Fournet strap from Cartier. This is to me is the proper shape and size for a men’s Cartier Tank.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20220429-1Q0A1074.jpg (176.9 KB, 376 views)
File Type: jpg 20220429-1Q0A1073.jpg (173.1 KB, 370 views)
File Type: jpg 20220429-1Q0A1071.jpg (229.6 KB, 367 views)
File Type: jpg 20220429-1Q0A1079.jpg (230.3 KB, 366 views)
Michael T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2022, 04:12 AM   #2
spdrcrbmw
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Real Name: Maaz Mohiuddin
Location: Chicago
Posts: 30
This was my father's favorite watch so have fond memories
spdrcrbmw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2022, 09:50 PM   #3
BLACKHORSE 6
"TRF" Member
 
BLACKHORSE 6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex SS Daytona
Posts: 2,621
Thanks for the review!

A Cartier Tank is on my list to buy one day, and this iteration of the Tank is one I’ve had my eye on. You’re correct about the 3:4 ratio. Date windows simply don’t work on the Tank, but this is the exception as I think it looks great.

It’s almost like this Tank should have been part of the CPCP collection but wasn’t. While it’s missing the “Paris” that makes the CPCP so recognizable, this watch has all the things that made CPCP special.
BLACKHORSE 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2022, 09:20 AM   #4
Dino944
"TRF" Member
 
Dino944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Rhode Island
Watch: Batman, Kermit
Posts: 1,065
Great review! The watch you bought is indeed the ideal size with the best proportions. I've tried it on both with the silver dial and the chocolate dial. The Tank XL extra-flat that was released later, it was too large, had the wrong proportions. Also the lack of guilloche was a bit disappointing.

I lucked out and got the last new CPCP Tank XL that was available in the US, back in 2008. If I hadn't been able to get my watch, I would have chosen the version you bought, which has all the right features: great size; proper proportions; great dial, and deployant clasp.

Thanks for sharing your review with us. My Tank says hello to yours.
Dino944 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2022, 10:20 AM   #5
Michael T
2024 Pledge Member
 
Michael T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,147
Thanks Dino, I appreciate you weighing in here.
Michael T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2022, 03:31 AM   #6
Dino944
"TRF" Member
 
Dino944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Rhode Island
Watch: Batman, Kermit
Posts: 1,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael T View Post
Thanks Dino, I appreciate you weighing in here.
Again great review and love your watch! Cheers!
Dino944 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.