ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 June 2011, 09:30 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,220
|
Sea Dweller 16600 New Arrival! Mini Review.
Hey folks,
I've been quite a fickle Rolex fan over the past year plus. I've owned pretty much all of the Subs from 1680 to 14060 to 16610 to 116610 Sub-C and I've loved them all. Yet something keeps making me flip or trade my watches! The one that I had not seen yet was the Sea Dweller 16600. I arranged a very amicable trade recently with a highly-renowned TRF member and I've now been wearing my new M-serial 16600 for more than two days. Here are my initial impressions. Keep in mind that my context for this watch is that it would be too large for my wrist. I have small 6.5" wrists and had previously rejected the Omega PO on four occasions. So I was a little bit worried about the SD. Weight and Wrist Feel + Presence Let's get this out of the way first. I had been wearing only a 1680 Red Sub, mostly on NATO straps, so the 16600 was perhaps a 2x increase in weight if I want to exaggerate a little bit. When I first got it sized and on my wrist, I was like, "oh wow, feels like I just strapped a 1 lb weight to my wrist, get it off now!" I was patient and gave it some time to break in on my wrist. It is indeed a heavier watch than what I've been wearing recently, but it turns out to be quite comfortable. It does have a beefy, thick case that is certainly taller than the Sub Dates I'd owned in the past. Yet it has a slightly smaller dimension that makes it float on the wrist and the caseback height pushes the crown up just far enough that it really can't dig into my wrist like other Subs have done in the past. After wearing it for two days, I've forgotten all about the extra weight. It actually feels quite comfortable and pleasing to have the increased heft in a very manageable size. The big difference for me between this and the PO is that the SD has a smooth caseback that does not dig into my wrist at al. I look down upon this watch and I see a 14060M with a more muscular presence. It's very cool! After owning a number of Rolex watches with lug holes and collecting a nice set of straps, I'm a little bummed about the extra effort to evacuate the bracelet without lug holes. Not the end of the world. Bezel & Dial This is interesting as the 16600 has a slightly smaller diameter and it is very subtle. It looks like a 14060M, but there's a date! I think the bezel may actually be a tiny bit wider than the 14060M, but not much different. The surround with teeth is much more substantial and taller than the no-date Sub. Quite handsome. The classic black insert is timeless and sharp with fat fonts intact like it is paying homage to its vintage ancesters. The dial is that glossy black, like a pool of shiny oil. Very nice looking and picks up reflections from the smooth sweeping seconds hand. The markers are not maxi, but really all that is needed on this watch. I have owned vintage and modern Subs with larger plots...I think the matte style non-surround maxi plots are the best, but when you look at this watch vs. a 16610LV or 116610LN, this has a more stealth appearance without those ginormous WG plots. I like it. The date wheel minus cyclops is intriguing. It has such a reduced size without the cyclops. The little date is almost comically tiny!!! It takes awhile to get used to this. I really wonder why Rolex switched to white date wheels and did away with the open 6 and 9 numerals. Bummer. I've grown to strongly dislike engraved rehaut on any Rolex and I'm glad this one does not have it. Nice and clean! Crystal Nice thick sapphire crystal that stands noticeably proud of the bezel. Not nearly as tall as a 1680 top hat, but a marked difference from the 16610 Sub Date. Very cool with no cyclops as I have had a polarizing relationship with the cyclops. My eyes love the way a 1680 silver date wheel is magnified with a cyclops, but seeing the clean thick crystal completely unobstructed is indeed a thing of beauty. Bracelet and Clasp Standard issue pre-ceramic flip lock here with the SELs. I like it very much for its lightness and beauty, but really wish they had put one more removable link on the 6:00 side. My wrist is small and 5 links on this side is almost too much. I know many people have removed a perm link, but this is invasive and I'm not quite ready to do it. The clasp is really not centered at all and the head leans towards the 12:00 side, but in all honesty, it is not much different than what I've experienced with the 93150 bracelets. I can live with it. In a perfect world, I'd have a Sub-C glidelock clasp on this watch and all would be well with the world. Wish List
That pretty much sums it up for the 16600 SD based on 48 hours of observation. The movement seems pretty stable at about +2-3 sec per day, but I have not been micro-managing this aspect of the watch. As a previous Sub-C owner, I must say that the SD is a little bit more stealth on the wrist given its classic lugs and slightly smaller diameter. I've often wanted the 14060 to be my one and only Sub, but I am so dependent on the date that I can't really do the 14060 every day (good weekend watch). I hope this is helpful. Here's a quick photo I snapped in the driveway today while waiting for my family to join me for a trip to the pool. |
13 June 2011, 09:31 AM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,329
|
Now that is a serious review! Congrats and great write up!
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
13 June 2011, 09:41 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
Good review.
|
13 June 2011, 09:48 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Chris
Location: Camden ME & STT
Watch: 116600
Posts: 6,350
|
Excellent review of an excellent watch!
__________________
Rolex 116600 Sea-dweller Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White Legrand FP Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White RB Montblanc Meisterstück Diamond Mozart BP Montblanc Meisterstück Mozart BP |
13 June 2011, 09:49 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Muddy
Watch: ducks ina row
Posts: 141
|
I enjoyed reading your very informative review, thanks!
|
13 June 2011, 09:59 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Howard
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,588
|
Nice review of a great watch. Congrats.
|
13 June 2011, 10:01 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North America
Posts: 11,053
|
Good on you, such a classic. I do wish it had better lume.
|
13 June 2011, 10:05 AM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 3,200
|
Nice. You should copy this and put it in the review section.
|
13 June 2011, 10:12 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Congrats Eric. I think it looks great on you. Stick with it.......I hope it becomes a keeper for you
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
13 June 2011, 10:24 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,220
|
Thanks everyone! Here's another photo from the same impromptu iPhone session. This gives you a better idea for how it sits on my wrist most of the time.
|
13 June 2011, 11:05 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
|
Very nice review!!Congrats on a true classic
|
13 June 2011, 11:20 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Thien
Location: Frisco,TX/Saigon
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 2,754
|
Great review.
__________________
Sub. 5513 116710LN 116610LV “I THINK PERFECTION IS UGLY. SOMEWHERE IN THE THINGS HUMANS MAKE, I WANT TO SEE SCARS, FAILURE, DISORDER AND DISTORTION" - YOHJI YAMAMOTO |
13 June 2011, 11:25 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
Great job. Congrats on a Classic!
|
13 June 2011, 11:27 AM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Perth
Posts: 92
|
|
13 June 2011, 12:21 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 25,958
|
have you tried it on a nato?
the weight really disappears. i agree lugholes are missed (i just got the M SD myself) and also pleased there is no rehaut engraving!!!!
__________________
|
13 June 2011, 01:06 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: KJ
Location: NJ/NY
Watch: Sea Dweller 16600
Posts: 136
|
Great review, I always like reading other SD owner's reviews
|
13 June 2011, 07:37 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 32,031
|
Nice aquisition!
The classic SD is a winner!
|
13 June 2011, 08:47 PM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Singapore :)
Watch: Sea Dweller 4000
Posts: 226
|
Quote:
I faced similar issue with the SD which I have just acquired. Decided to leave the watch as it is even though the clasp is not centred. Small sacriface to pay for a timeless classic! And as you have pointed out, removal of the cyclop makes a (small) world of difference on the wrist!
__________________
There is never enough time for good watches |
|
13 June 2011, 09:08 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: GMT+1
Posts: 2,711
|
Very nice review! And congrats to a great watch!
Like you I have slim wrists, and find that the slightly smaller dial on the 16600 and the 14060 offers a more proportional look. I'm fine with the traditional 16610 too, but the most comfortable Submariner I've experienced so far is the Tudor 79090 with the same case as the 1680, but a flatter caseback, that works very nice for my flat wrist. I would argue that the 16600 was the last real tool watch produced by Rolex. An automatic, reliable watch as a back up to the dive computer for professional saturation divers. Best, A |
13 June 2011, 10:17 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Maui
Watch: Patek
Posts: 2,032
|
great review. I did the same thing, I had the new subC, couldnt get used to the lugs sticking out over my arm. I had a regular sub, but really never liked the bracelet, I love the sea dweller, its bezel is cut different or something than a submariner, its more shiny like diamonds. I have received more looks withk my dweller than any of my other rolexes. Like you I dont like the etched rehaults anymore. The dweller is tight, its a great watch.
|
13 June 2011, 11:01 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Atlanta
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 509
|
Great review! I sent my SD to the RSC and they removed a permanent link. It fits perfectly and the clasp is centered. Now, all it takes is a toothpick to adjust the clasp a bit if I need more room.
|
13 June 2011, 11:13 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: 16600
Posts: 728
|
Congrats. This is the ultimate all-around dive watch ever produced. Period.
__________________
V/R Mike |
14 June 2011, 04:39 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Raf
Location: NJ
Watch: GMTII
Posts: 2,149
|
Eric, nice pick-up. As stated above, if the watch is a keeper for you, remove the perm link on the 6 o'clock side. It's a DIY job or the RSC can do it. You can always regain length by adding screwed links if need be.
|
17 June 2011, 11:39 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Denver
Posts: 98
|
Great review. Thanks for sharing.
I too have smaller wrists, but enjoy larger watches. There is something about the heft of the SD case on such a light bracelet that I finally gave in and removed one of the permanent links on the 6 side. Did it myself with two pairs of vice grips. I haven't regretted that move for a second. It sits nicer on the wrist now for me. I do wear NATO straps often, and once the strap is cinched around the wrist (snug - but not tight) the weight completely disappears. I've never owned a lug hole watch, so working with the concealed springbars is just something I am used to. I love my watch. I love seeing other people who enjoy it as well. Congrats! |
17 June 2011, 11:47 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
|
Your review was great to read...thanks Eric
I've always liked the SD..and now I want one even more In time Great to see you enjoying yours so much
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------ "The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw |
18 June 2011, 01:11 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Scotland
Watch: 14060m
Posts: 631
|
Great Write up!
I would ask you to try flipping the clasp round as I have a 14060m and suffered the same clasp issues as you. Whilst flipping the clasp round doesn't centre it completely it does help with the way the watch sits on your wrist. Try it and see. |
18 June 2011, 02:06 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: Switzerland
Watch: too many
Posts: 1,149
|
Great review Eric, thank you very much.
I own a SD 16600 and this watch will never go! It is a true Rolex classic, almost no changes for the last decades of years. Enjoy it! Tom |
18 June 2011, 09:23 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Gary
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rolex Sub Serti
Posts: 545
|
I LONG to own a SD 16600!! It is definitely my next Rolex. All other watch purchases are on hold until I can count up enough pennies to make it happen!!
|
19 June 2011, 12:23 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Nice review!
|
15 July 2011, 01:08 PM | #30 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Location: pa
Watch: GMT master II
Posts: 600
|
great review.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.