ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 August 2009, 12:43 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Piacenza - Italy
Watch: sub 16610 k series
Posts: 51
|
Undecided
Hello all! I'm Andrea from Italy and it is my first post in this forum.
I like this forum very much, because I'm a rolex fan I have a question for all, I want to buy a new rlx 2009 series, but I'm undecide: - DJ 116234 - Exp I - 14060M COSC I've got a 2001 Sub 16610. Thank you all for support! |
7 August 2009, 01:20 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Rick
Location: Wakanda
Watch: amacallit
Posts: 2,017
|
From the choice you have given I would select the datejust since you already own a sport model. Welcome to the forum..
|
7 August 2009, 01:23 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Allan
Location: California
Posts: 3,210
|
|
7 August 2009, 01:26 AM | #4 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,049
|
Welcome to the Forum..
That's quite a variety of options....... they couldn't be much further apart for looks.... Let us know what you decide.......
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
7 August 2009, 01:32 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Piacenza - Italy
Watch: sub 16610 k series
Posts: 51
|
I had a DJ 16014 too, but onestly I like explorer I very much, so I think it will be my choice...maybe!
|
7 August 2009, 02:15 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Canada
Watch: Sea Dweller "V"
Posts: 98
|
Since you have a Sub already, I would opt for the Explorer.
|
7 August 2009, 02:29 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
|
I agree that either the Explorer or DJ would be a nice partner to the Sub you already have.
|
7 August 2009, 02:52 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,605
|
DATEJUST!!!
Explorer is too similar to the sub, in my opinion |
7 August 2009, 03:06 AM | #9 |
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Sink-O!
Location: a praire in AZ
Watch: ROLEX-less atm...
Posts: 14,007
|
Here's what I would do...
You already have the date function watch, 16610. You need something without the date now, get the EXPLORER, its a classic ! Thanks, Randy |
7 August 2009, 03:09 AM | #10 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 DATEJUST41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Oscar
Location: Florida
Watch: Me!!!
Posts: 23,225
|
I would go for the DJ...so you can have an alternative for formal and and sport...
__________________
|
7 August 2009, 04:28 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Colin Leask.
Location: Scotland, UK.
Watch: 118238 YG DD.
Posts: 723
|
Go for the 116234.
I got one about 8 weeks ago and I am very happy with it. Colin. |
7 August 2009, 04:32 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Nate
Location: USA
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 273
|
Im biased towards the 14060M, but as others have said-since you own a Sub I guess I can branch out. I guess...
Good luck though one will catch your eye!!! |
7 August 2009, 04:48 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Anastasios
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 8,497
|
Good looks advantage DateJust...................
Good value Explorer I..................................... Good resale value 14060M COSC............................ |
7 August 2009, 04:53 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Banu
Location: London
Watch: Rolex Sub no date
Posts: 32
|
Explorer
__________________
Rolex Sub no date Rolex Explorer I Omega '53 Fat Arrow Sinn 857 Marathon GSAR |
7 August 2009, 06:06 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Brad
Location: Iowa
Watch: Air-King
Posts: 624
|
116234, I almost bought this one:
|
7 August 2009, 06:06 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,148
|
I'd suggest the Datejust with a light dial, to give you some contrast with your Sub
|
7 August 2009, 08:30 AM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Watch: GMTIIc & Milgauss
Posts: 40
|
Explorer too....classy, simple, elegant watch :)
|
7 August 2009, 08:52 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Colombia
Posts: 427
|
EXPLORER, matches the sub perfectly, sporty but still dressy. second choice would be a DJ, but id keep the explorer
__________________
Pepsi GMT Master II (Z series)Sub 14060M COSC (M series) Platinum yatchmaster (random) JLC Master Compressor Chrono Sub-C (random) Sub C bluessy (random) IWC big pilot |
7 August 2009, 09:33 AM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
Given what you have and what you want I would go with the Ex1.
|
7 August 2009, 11:21 AM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: At what TIME?!!!
Watch: the SKY tonite!
Posts: 3,225
|
|
7 August 2009, 11:41 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 3,417
|
you wrote: I had a DJ 16014 too, but onestly I like explorer I very much, so I think it will be my choice...maybe!
I think you answered your own question, EXP sounds like the right watch for you. Although a sport watch, it is very different and much dressier than a 16610. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.