The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 April 2020, 05:16 AM   #1
jankymutt
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 435
Most comfortable submariner reference?

*Sorry for possibly a redundant question but I couldn’t find the thread that really answered this.*

As the title suggests I am looking for a pre-ceramic submariner to daily wear on my 6.5” wrist.  I recently bought a 114060 and though I do love it it is on the cusp of too big/heavy to wear daily.

I have been looking at all references from 1680 (white dial) all the way through to the 16610 I don't want to spend over $13,000 so the Red Submariner references are out of the question and since I already have a no-date sub I think I want one with a date complication now.

Any suggestions!?



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
2FA TRF Account
jankymutt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 05:20 AM   #2
watchmework
"TRF" Member
 
watchmework's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DC
Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600
Posts: 7,869
How about a 16610LN without lug holes? They are good looking watches and will come with the SELs.
watchmework is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 06:16 AM   #3
thesharkfactor
"TRF" Member
 
thesharkfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,512
14060M is very comfortable.
thesharkfactor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 06:17 AM   #4
Jefferyasher
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 329
yes, the 14060m is an easy daily wearer!!
Jefferyasher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 06:19 AM   #5
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by thesharkfactor View Post
14060M is very comfortable.
Agree
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 06:19 AM   #6
dummykid
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 182
is 114060 much heavier than 14060M ? I have Tudor BB58 and its pretty light on my wrist. Right now I am look into 114060 until I read this post.
dummykid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 06:22 AM   #7
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by dummykid View Post
is 114060 much heavier than 14060M ? I have Tudor BB58 and its pretty light on my wrist. Right now I am look into 114060 until I read this post.
Yes it's a bit heavier but the glidelock clasp can save the day so I'd say go for it.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 06:26 AM   #8
WyoWatch
"TRF" Member
 
WyoWatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Chad
Location: USA
Watch: 1675 GMT and Sub C
Posts: 1,443
My 116610LN became worlds more comfortable once I put it on a RubberB strap with OEM bracelet deployment clasp. IMO the rubber is much more comfortable than steel plus there was a significant reduction in weight.
WyoWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 06:38 AM   #9
jankymutt
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 435
Quote:
Originally Posted by WyoWatch View Post
My 116610LN became worlds more comfortable once I put it on a RubberB strap with OEM bracelet deployment clasp. IMO the rubber is much more comfortable than steel plus there was a significant reduction in weight.
I am definitely looking into the RubberB strap for the 1140690. I really like the watch and the glidelock so do want to keep the watch. The rubber strap might help with that.

I was thinking of a vintage watch from the 80's (I was born in 82) but the prices seem steep (I know that's all relative) so perhaps the 14060M is the way to go!
__________________
2FA TRF Account
jankymutt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 06:54 AM   #10
zion_rasta
"TRF" Member
 
zion_rasta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: GMT II ceramic
Posts: 1,590
1680
__________________
Sky Dweller WG 326139
GMT II 116710LN
Submariner 1680
Sold - Daytona 116523; YM 116622; Datejust 16233
zion_rasta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 07:28 AM   #11
Ntoz
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 273
16610LN is a comfortable watch though
Ntoz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 07:35 AM   #12
robby818
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4
I have a 6.75" wrist and find the 14060M w/ stock bracelet very comfortable. It is not at all heavy and it looks proportional to my arm. I am looking forward to the next re-design which should have slimmer lugs and all the modern features of the 114060 like glidelock and chromalight, but I think I will still hang on to my 14060m, I like it so much.
robby818 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 07:45 AM   #13
Dahh
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 237
16610ln
Dahh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 08:15 AM   #14
Oldfellow
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,089
Try a 14060M, it is beautifully balanced, and very comfortable.
Oldfellow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 08:17 AM   #15
kumar75203
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Dallas
Posts: 268
There's an active thread right now where the OP just bought a SD4k because he thought it was more comfortable than a 6 digit sub. Also with a 6.5 - 6.75 wrist.
kumar75203 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 09:09 AM   #16
Dr. Robert
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Dr. Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 61,545
Quote:
Originally Posted by thesharkfactor View Post
14060M is very comfortable.
I concur
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Dr. Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 09:27 AM   #17
Boaters
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,649
They are all comfy but the new maxi case works best for my 7.75 in wrist.
Boaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 04:49 PM   #18
OldOak
"TRF" Member
 
OldOak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 422
I would be tempted to look at the GMT 5 digit if you like a pre ceramic with date but comfort is an issue.
I have the 14060M and love it, but the comfort of the gmt is better. Smaller crown which never digs into the hand, less weight (opinion, not weighed) and slightly more streamlined.
You can also switch out the black insert for a Pepsi or coke!
Just my 2p. All the best in your quest.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OldOak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 05:32 PM   #19
Onewatchguy82
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Orlando
Watch: Meteorite
Posts: 494
I have the new styles and the older
The most comfortable was the 1680 in my opinion.
Since then the rolexes have gone besides my explorer 2
I dive in this, which is comfortable
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Webp.net-resizeimage.jpg (84.4 KB, 220 views)
Onewatchguy82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 06:11 PM   #20
Woody
"TRF" Member
 
Woody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Africa
Posts: 1,120
I am lucky to own a 1680, 14060M and a 116610. They all wear very well on my 6.75 wrist, but if you want the lightest option then I would suggest you try the 4 digit references. My 1680 certainly feels lighter (and more flimsy) than the two later models. As an aside, a couple of years back I had the opportunity to try on all the ceramic Sub, Seadweller and Deepsea models back-to-back in an AD. The most comfortable for me was the 114060....which I believe is the one you already own.
Woody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 07:09 PM   #21
OldOak
"TRF" Member
 
OldOak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 422

Perfect reminder for me to put this back on today. Definitely not heavy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OldOak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 08:14 PM   #22
huba01
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dubai
Posts: 1,426
All non sels subs are might rattle a little, but are super comfortable
huba01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 09:10 PM   #23
jankymutt
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 435
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldOak View Post
I would be tempted to look at the GMT 5 digit if you like a pre ceramic with date but comfort is an issue.
I have the 14060M and love it, but the comfort of the gmt is better. Smaller crown which never digs into the hand, less weight (opinion, not weighed) and slightly more streamlined.
You can also switch out the black insert for a Pepsi or coke!
Just my 2p. All the best in your quest.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is very intriguing! I’m a diver so I liked the history (wouldn’t dive in the vintage submariner) of the sub, but I do love the look of the vintage Pepsi and Coke GMT’s! Thanks!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
2FA TRF Account
jankymutt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 09:12 PM   #24
jankymutt
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woody View Post
I am lucky to own a 1680, 14060M and a 116610. They all wear very well on my 6.75 wrist, but if you want the lightest option then I would suggest you try the 4 digit references. My 1680 certainly feels lighter (and more flimsy) than the two later models. As an aside, a couple of years back I had the opportunity to try on all the ceramic Sub, Seadweller and Deepsea models back-to-back in an AD. The most comfortable for me was the 114060....which I believe is the one you already own.

Thanks for the insight in the 4 digit references. I have yet to hold one so I appreciate the info! Here is my 114060!




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
2FA TRF Account
jankymutt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2020, 09:37 PM   #25
OldOak
"TRF" Member
 
OldOak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 422
Quote:
Originally Posted by jankymutt View Post
This is very intriguing! I’m a diver so I liked the history (wouldn’t dive in the vintage submariner) of the sub, but I do love the look of the vintage Pepsi and Coke GMT’s! Thanks!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

AND...... then you could keep the sub you have. Watches are strange in my experience. I always used to sell to enable me to buy the next one I thought I loved. Boy I do have some mild regrets! The Pepsi is so beautiful, and extremely comfortable. I would say the easiest watch to wear that I own.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OldOak is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.