ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Maiden · 28 May 2021, 05:17 AM

Hi I would love some feedback from members who have experienced both SEL and non SEL bracelets. I am looking to aquire a 16610 and have set in my head it should be SEL. For those that have owned both, it is worth waiting for an SEL model, or if a good condition non SEL comes up at the right price would you go for it!
Thanks

Wrist Watcher · 28 May 2021, 05:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maiden

Hi I would love some feedback from members who have experienced both SEL and non SEL bracelets. I am looking to aquire a 16610 and have set in my head it should be SEL. For those that have owned both, it is worth waiting for an SEL model, or if a good condition non SEL comes up at the right price would you go for it!
Thanks

I tried a 14060M last year and did not like the non-SEL bracelet. It felt cheap compared to the more recent bracelets, so I would pay a little more for a 16610 that has SELs. I'm not sure I would pay a lot more for it though since I like to put straps (rubber particularly) on my divers anyway during the warm months.

SN13 · 28 May 2021, 05:22 AM

SEL is more better.

But I don't think it's worth delaying months and months. Plus, it looks like you have a 5 digit sub with SEL's already and are likely looking for a beater sub, so grab one and go, and don't sweat it.

jpwv · 28 May 2021, 05:23 AM

I have a 16610 and the bracelet feels great. I am not sure if it is SEL or not.

Maiden · 28 May 2021, 05:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jpwv

I have a 16610 and the bracelet feels great. I am not sure if it is SEL or not.

I think if its 2001 or newer it will have SEL

jpwv · 28 May 2021, 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maiden

I think if its 2001 or newer it will have SEL

2008. It does feel very substantial so it probably is sel.

28 May 2021, 05:17 AM	#1
Maiden "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Canada Posts: 3,650	SEL vs Non SEL Hi I would love some feedback from members who have experienced both SEL and non SEL bracelets. I am looking to aquire a 16610 and have set in my head it should be SEL. For those that have owned both, it is worth waiting for an SEL model, or if a good condition non SEL comes up at the right price would you go for it! Thanks __________________ Rolex 116613LN Rolex 16610LN Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 41mm Omega Geneve Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAY2112 Orient Ray 2

28 May 2021, 05:22 AM	#3
SN13 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2015 Location: Florida Posts: 1,124	SEL is more better. But I don't think it's worth delaying months and months. Plus, it looks like you have a 5 digit sub with SEL's already and are likely looking for a beater sub, so grab one and go, and don't sweat it. __________________ IG@Construction_Time --- 1986 DD 18038 --- 1992 YM 16628 --- 2015 116600 SD4K --- SBDX001 MM300 --- 2009 Omega Ploprof White --- 2010 Omega LE LMPO

28 May 2021, 05:23 AM	#4
jpwv Banned Join Date: Nov 2017 Location: North Carolina Posts: 337	I have a 16610 and the bracelet feels great. I am not sure if it is SEL or not.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)