The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Watches (Non-Rolex) Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 November 2016, 03:49 AM   #1
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
Richemont – last one out turn off the lights!

A few hours ago, Richemont announced more woes – job cuts by way of 200 highly skilled watchmakers.
This comes only a week and a bit after Chairman Johann Rupert announced he was doing away with the CEO position of each brand.
Redundancies are mostly contained to Piaget and Vacheron Constantin, and adds to the 100 jobs cut earlier in the year, predominantly from Cartier.

First half-year operating profits are down by 43%, at €798M (hardly broke, are they?), and are expecting to add €150M to that figure with the sales of some of their investment properties in Paris, France.

Given the current dire straights that they (and the rest of the Swiss watch industry) are presently facing, and presumably the years ahead, I wonder how it’s all going to end up?
Any thoughts on how this will play out?

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...mid-watch-woes
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2016, 04:03 AM   #2
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
I think Richemont produced terrible designs for too many years, while being carried by an incredibly hot market for watches. Their most recent releases are less bad, but still nothing like 2002 or so. It will be interesting to see what happens.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2016, 04:07 AM   #3
ansharma
"TRF" Member
 
ansharma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Watch: Lange 1 Moonphase
Posts: 1,743
Interesting- thanks for sharing. The economy is not helping nor the current political situation - all leading to a lot of uncertainty.

I think we will see less innovation and more value for money watches. Brands will try and increase their audience so we may see more diverse ranges targeted at different age groups than previously for each brand.

Cheers
Anuj


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ansharma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2016, 05:32 AM   #4
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
Oh well...not surprised. I do feel sorry for the watchmakers that lost their job and hope they find new employment.

Aside from ALS, none of their brands do much for me.
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2016, 06:20 AM   #5
RUK
"TRF" Member
 
RUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Ruk
Location: .ie
Watch: 5711,Sub,Daytona,P
Posts: 1,232
They will have to adjust pricing if they want to prevent and all out collapse.

The recent price hikes were crazy. It makes it very difficult to justify buying them new. A new watch went up by over 20-30% when the CHF changed and you can buy them for 50-60% off RRP if you look around.

I would expect new models at much cheaper prices and possibly price cuts to help move the current stock.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
__________________
'The best watch out there is the one you like the most'
RUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2016, 06:21 AM   #6
RUK
"TRF" Member
 
RUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Ruk
Location: .ie
Watch: 5711,Sub,Daytona,P
Posts: 1,232
They will have to adjust pricing if they want to prevent and all out collapse.

The recent price hikes were crazy. It makes it very difficult to justify buying them new. A new watch went up by over 20-30% when the CHF changed and you can buy them for 50-60% off RRP if you look around.
Thanks
I would expect new models at much cheaper prices and possibly price cuts to help move the current stock.

As for the watch makers- hope Patek hires them to get the services done faster!

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
__________________
'The best watch out there is the one you like the most'
RUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2016, 06:26 AM   #7
psv
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North America
Posts: 11,062
It is not really surprising, I think core watch lines are hurting but it is the extra vaganza diamond jewelry business that is really hurting, I suspect.
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2016, 06:37 PM   #8
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
Too bad for the guys who lost their jobs, like was said I hope Patek hires and trains them to speed up service.
This is normal since Russia is suffering from oil prices and sanctions, and in China there are efforts to cut down on anything too luxurious, watches being the most obvious, when not long ago rich chinese businessmen, politics and celebrities were wearing high horology, now if they do it's often more discreet pieces.
I think that with these two major markets closing down or almost, there is way too much offer and not enough demand, will that change in a few years, not sure, but to keep the market healthy brands should clearly cut down on production, I mean even Patek announced they were cutting down.
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2016, 07:45 PM   #9
kaiserphoenix
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: London/Tokyo
Watch: FPJ CO BL
Posts: 1,599
The price discrepancy is just too high between retail price and 2ndary market. An IWC Portuguese Chronograph is now over £6K in the UK, that is for the standard ETA version, I think thats just outrageous. Not because the 7750 is cr*p, but it used to be like £3800 or so, the price increase has not led to an increase in quality. 6-10 years ago, you could expect as a fresh graduate to perhaps save up to buy an IWC or Rolex Sub as your 1st starter watch, but now I think its impossible, they are both around £6K new and wages have just not kept up. Im not saying wages should keep up with watch prices haha (i wish they did), but Richemont has perhaps been way too bullish in the price increases and priced alot of people out of the market.
__________________
F.P.Journe Chronometre Optimum Black Label, Patek 5811G-001, A. Lange & Söhne Lange 1 191.039, Patek 5167A-001, Rolex Yacht-Master 40 Everrose, (Wh) Rolex Daytona 116500, (Blue) Rolex Skydweller 326934, Rolex Submariner 126610LV

IG: tokyo_watch_guy
kaiserphoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2016, 08:16 PM   #10
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,494
A bit over-extended, but they will be fine. Too many great brands not to be.
Cru Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2016, 09:59 PM   #11
1William
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 44,731
I believe that you will see an adjustment in the market related to prices and production. They are holding off on significant price reductions as are other brands and manufactures. When it starts it will be a free fall for all the brands. It will devastate the second hand market and will require deep pocket to last it out. And I believe all brands will feel the impact.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2016, 12:33 AM   #12
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
It will be interesting to follow this development. Considering Richemont's wide range of brands I guess they will have an easier time adjusting to the market than say Journe or Patek, on the other hand Richemont is publicly traded and the stock owners might demand results fast.
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2016, 04:02 AM   #13
Hollister
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1William View Post
I believe that you will see an adjustment in the market related to prices and production. They are holding off on significant price reductions as are other brands and manufactures. When it starts it will be a free fall for all the brands. It will devastate the second hand market and will require deep pocket to last it out. And I believe all brands will feel the impact.
Sadly, I agree.
Hollister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2016, 05:23 AM   #14
masyv6
2024 Pledge Member
 
masyv6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: 35000ft
Posts: 3,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by RUK View Post
They will have to adjust pricing if they want to prevent and all out collapse.

The recent price hikes were crazy. It makes it very difficult to justify buying them new. A new watch went up by over 20-30% when the CHF changed and you can buy them for 50-60% off RRP if you look around.

I would expect new models at much cheaper prices and possibly price cuts to help move the current stock.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
There are very few Richemont brands that I'd even begin to consider paying near retail for.
masyv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2016, 05:39 AM   #15
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
Cartier. Wow.
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2016, 06:24 AM   #16
slcbbrown
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,688
Almost every luxury item made has to operate in a cyclic market with ups and downs. Once you understand the nature of these businesses, they only matter when a company can't make it through the troughs. I worked in a non-luxury, heavy manufacturing business for about 37 years, and a wise man once told me, "Don't be impressed with your profit making ability in the up cycle-- every idiot makes money, then. It's the down cycle that separates the winners from non-winners. If you can't make it through the downturn, the winners will buy your assets at bargain basement prices".

While I find these "the sky is falling" articles mildly interesting, they are a dime a dozen. Why would anyone think that companies that have been printing money won't have to adjust in a slower market. My guess is that if you find a seasoned watch builder, he can't remember all the cycles, and the only one that is special is the quartz crisis.

Last edited by slcbbrown; 18 November 2016 at 06:26 AM.. Reason: Spellig
slcbbrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2016, 08:24 AM   #17
psv
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North America
Posts: 11,062
Well, the US mortgage market is just about to go BOOM with interest rates rising to 5-6%, which will affect the overall economy. The era of cheap/free money is over, which will severely impact the high end watch market as well.
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2016, 10:44 AM   #18
conkers
"TRF" Member
 
conkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Roger
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,994
I am doing my bit to support them. Just bought 3 big Jaeger pieces!
conkers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2016, 02:33 AM   #19
Hollister
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
Well, the US mortgage market is just about to go BOOM with interest rates rising to 5-6%, which will affect the overall economy. The era of cheap/free money is over
And about time, if you ask me.
Hollister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2016, 04:28 AM   #20
fmc000
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Fabio
Location: Como - Italy
Posts: 4,811
Quote:
Originally Posted by conkers View Post
I am doing my bit to support them. Just bought 3 big Jaeger pieces!
Looking forward for the pics! Congrats in advance.
fmc000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2016, 07:10 AM   #21
p_mcgee
"TRF" Member
 
p_mcgee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,149
In 2002, I paid the $3,100 MSRP for my Panerai PAM 48. Just for fun I plugged that into an inflation calculator & it's roughly equivalent to $4,100 in today dollars.

Today's MSRP on the exact same watch is $6,800-- a 66% real price increase. Maybe that kind of pricing strategy can work in a hot market, but the party appears to be over & the lights are now being turned off.

I still love Panerai, JLC, VC, IWC, etc. but it's time to wait for this shake out & search for value in the preowned market. I feel bad for their watchmakers & some of the folks I know in their dealer network.
p_mcgee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2016, 11:20 AM   #22
conkers
"TRF" Member
 
conkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Roger
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by fmc000 View Post
Looking forward for the pics! Congrats in advance.
One of them will be my most spectacular incoming ever. No mean feat.
conkers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2016, 12:19 PM   #23
themast
"TRF" Member
 
themast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: US
Posts: 2,704
Quote:
Originally Posted by conkers View Post
One of them will be my most spectacular incoming ever. No mean feat.
Are you going to top the 4 Patek PCC incoming!?
themast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2016, 12:19 PM   #24
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by conkers View Post
I am doing my bit to support them. Just bought 3 big Jaeger pieces!
Oh that'll be great

Quote:
Originally Posted by conkers View Post
One of them will be my most spectacular incoming ever. No mean feat.
Wow we should really be in for a treat, maybe the reverso tryptique? Now that is an amazing piece, not a big tourbillon fan but the JLC Gyro ones are amazing.

Thank God we have Roger for regular crazy incomings here
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2016, 02:24 PM   #25
conkers
"TRF" Member
 
conkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Roger
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,994
Well it is 3 Jaegers two are wonderful but one is at a different level entirely. 4 PCCs from Patek is obviously hard to top but for a single item one of the 3 Jaegers is leagues ahead of anything I have owned before. It will require a lengthy incoming teaser thread of its own!
conkers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2016, 02:28 PM   #26
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 25,995
No richemont products in my sights.

they had many years of record growth... This is how they repay their employees?
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2016, 02:31 PM   #27
nick c
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
They going to open in Toronto panerai boutique Yorkdale mall
nick c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2016, 02:57 PM   #28
KarlS
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by subtona View Post
No richemont products in my sights.

Hey had many years of record growth... This is how they repay their employees?
Sadly they are a corporation which is why they will survive!! Decisive action early irrespective of the soft issues like people's livelihoods. When the market picks up they will just offer more money and steal a batch from a competitor!
KarlS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2016, 03:05 PM   #29
997.2TTS
"TRF" Member
 
997.2TTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Tommy
Location: So Cal + Taipei
Watch: Datograph up/dn RG
Posts: 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by subtona View Post
No richemont products in my sights.

Hey had many years of record growth... This is how they repay their employees?


This.. +1


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
997.2TTS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2016, 07:11 AM   #30
Orangejoe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 281
Quote:
Originally Posted by subtona View Post
No richemont products in my sights.

they had many years of record growth... This is how they repay their employees?
Do you think the market (see the other posts here in this thread) cares?

Do you think anyone considering their pieces is going to say "Hey, contrast this with Hayek Jr.'s statement s of retaining their workforce over at Swatch Group . I'm by one of their pieces instead!"

Richemont consumers don't care. Why should they?
__________________
Truth be told today many don't wear a watch, they just wear the brand. -padi56
Orangejoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.