ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Sublovin · 8 July 2019, 09:27 PM

I own a 16220, and understand the differences regarding crystal and the movement difference 3035 vs 3135.
Can someone tell me if the overall thickness is different between the two watches mentioned above? Is the 16030 slightly thinner than the 16220? Thanks

FloridaSam · 8 July 2019, 10:27 PM

I think the 16030 would be thicker as the plexi crystal sits higher than the sapphire. But I don't have both to measure.

Sublovin · 8 July 2019, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FloridaSam

I think the 16030 would be thicker as the plexi crystal sits higher than the sapphire. But I don't have both to measure.

Thanks, good point. Maybe I should ask if the case back sits higher in the 16220.

8 July 2019, 09:27 PM	#1
Sublovin "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: USA Watch: Lots Posts: 4,354	Datejust 16220 vs 16030 I own a 16220, and understand the differences regarding crystal and the movement difference 3035 vs 3135. Can someone tell me if the overall thickness is different between the two watches mentioned above? Is the 16030 slightly thinner than the 16220? Thanks __________________ DSSD is the king of all Rolex

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

8 July 2019, 10:27 PM	#2
FloridaSam "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: Sam Location: Sunny Florida Watch: Rolex 16013 Posts: 291	I think the 16030 would be thicker as the plexi crystal sits higher than the sapphire. But I don't have both to measure.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)