ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Tepeter1 · 9 July 2019, 03:32 PM

Forum Members

I haven’t posted very much, but would like to thank everyone on this forum for the

knowledge, entertainment and now hopefully the help. I have read here, watchuseek, Vintage Rolex Forum and the general internet about Jubilee bracelets. What I have found is a lot of conflicting information so I am asking for help from the experts here. I am attaching pictures of what I believe may be a Rolex 6251 with 55 end links. I have some questions about its authenticity, mainly because I have done so much research I don’t know what to believe. Here are my questions.

Is it possible for the gold to separate from 55 end links or are 255 end links the only two tone?

I have seen a lot of “6251” bracelets for sale with month and date stamps like this one, and have also seen some which were not stamped with the bracelet model number. An example link is here: https://www.chrono-shop.net/en/2538-...6542-5508.html. Does this mean fake for sure, or were there some of these made in this manner?

I have seen several “6521” bracelets with the month and date stamped upside down relative to the stamped ROLEX name and symbol. I no longer know if that makes them fake or not. Can anyone here shed some light on this?

According to my research, a lot of fakes only have 6 adjustment holes in the clasp whereas this one has 7. Does this seem concerning?

Many of you have much more experience than I. As a whole considering this bracelet would any of you be willing to give me some input on whether you think this bracelet is legitimate or not?

I sincerely appreciate any help from any of you.

Thank you

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

springer · 10 July 2019, 01:11 AM

I believe the Swiss two-tone bracelets had a 6252H 14 model number stamped on the clasp. The end links were stamped 250 on the GMTs but Datejusts used 55 end links with a thick gold cap over the center sections of the end links.

Tepeter1 · 10 July 2019, 08:23 AM

Yes, these end links look like they used to have caps on them at one point. I assume it is possible that they could fall off. 99% of these bracelets seem to have a stamp in them; however, I have found many examples from reputable sources that do not. I have searched high and low for a direct answer to this and can’t find one. Thank you for your reply btw.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

crowncollection · 10 July 2019, 08:55 AM

It’s should be stamped 6252h 14

255 ends are correct for it

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

9 July 2019, 03:32 PM	#1
Tepeter1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: USA Posts: 90	6251 Bracelet Help And Advice Forum Members I haven’t posted very much, but would like to thank everyone on this forum for the knowledge, entertainment and now hopefully the help. I have read here, watchuseek, Vintage Rolex Forum and the general internet about Jubilee bracelets. What I have found is a lot of conflicting information so I am asking for help from the experts here. I am attaching pictures of what I believe may be a Rolex 6251 with 55 end links. I have some questions about its authenticity, mainly because I have done so much research I don’t know what to believe. Here are my questions. Is it possible for the gold to separate from 55 end links or are 255 end links the only two tone? I have seen a lot of “6251” bracelets for sale with month and date stamps like this one, and have also seen some which were not stamped with the bracelet model number. An example link is here: https://www.chrono-shop.net/en/2538-...6542-5508.html. Does this mean fake for sure, or were there some of these made in this manner? I have seen several “6521” bracelets with the month and date stamped upside down relative to the stamped ROLEX name and symbol. I no longer know if that makes them fake or not. Can anyone here shed some light on this? According to my research, a lot of fakes only have 6 adjustment holes in the clasp whereas this one has 7. Does this seem concerning? Many of you have much more experience than I. As a whole considering this bracelet would any of you be willing to give me some input on whether you think this bracelet is legitimate or not? I sincerely appreciate any help from any of you. Thank you Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

10 July 2019, 01:11 AM	#2
springer 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: jP Location: Texas Watch: GMT-MASTER Posts: 17,197	I believe the Swiss two-tone bracelets had a 6252H 14 model number stamped on the clasp. The end links were stamped 250 on the GMTs but Datejusts used 55 end links with a thick gold cap over the center sections of the end links. __________________ Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.

10 July 2019, 08:55 AM	#4
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,157	It’s should be stamped 6252h 14 255 ends are correct for it Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ watches many

10 July 2019, 08:23 AM	#3
Tepeter1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: USA Posts: 90	Yes, these end links look like they used to have caps on them at one point. I assume it is possible that they could fall off. 99% of these bracelets seem to have a stamp in them; however, I have found many examples from reputable sources that do not. I have searched high and low for a direct answer to this and can’t find one. Thank you for your reply btw. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)