The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 June 2023, 12:37 PM   #1
Cosmokramer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2023
Real Name: Mark
Location: Canada
Watch: Planet Ocean 2201
Posts: 25
Is this appropriate patina, or a damaged dial

Hi folks, in my quest to find a vintage Submariner (either Rolex or Tudor) I have found this 16800 that I'm considering purchasing.
I'm wondering if this dial is nice patina or actual damage. Maybe moisture?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Screenshot_20230606_205705_Chrome.jpg (152.6 KB, 555 views)
File Type: jpg Screenshot_20230606_205711_Chrome.jpg (275.4 KB, 560 views)
Cosmokramer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2023, 12:43 PM   #2
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,841
It is definitely damage to the lacquer. Only you can decide if it's "nice," but it will certainly affect the value, IMO. Most people will probably not like it very much, because it's blotchy and not totally even, but it's really going to be a matter of personal taste, and price.

I like the color of the lume.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2023, 12:52 PM   #3
alwayshere
"TRF" Member
 
alwayshere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,502
Agree with Dan and the hands will likely get worse too.

I still don't know what typically causes those "corroded" marks? moisture I guess?
alwayshere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2023, 12:53 PM   #4
Cosmokramer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2023
Real Name: Mark
Location: Canada
Watch: Planet Ocean 2201
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan S View Post
It is definitely damage to the lacquer. Only you can decide if it's "nice," but it will certainly affect the value, IMO. Most people will probably not like it very much, because it's blotchy and not totally even, but it's really going to be a matter of personal taste, and price.

I like the color of the lume.
I see. So the fact that it's not even throughout the dial is the reason this type of patina that is not generally desirable?
Price is currently $7500 and has been on the market for 4 months in a local forum.
Cosmokramer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2023, 12:59 PM   #5
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cosmokramer View Post
I see. So the fact that it's not even throughout the dial is the reason this type of patina that is not generally desirable?
Price is currently $7500 and has been on the market for 4 months in a local forum.
I hesitate to generalize because this is such a personal thing. Some people can't tolerate any type of damage to the dial. But amongst people that can tolerate some patina/damage, I think that evenly spread or symmetrical damage is more often appreciated. Uneven damage, scratches, prominent marks/spots, blotches, stains, etc., are generally found to be less attractive.

Let's see what other people say, but you should really be prepared to follow your own feelings, don't base your decision on the opinions of others. But, yes, the damage on that dial is making the watch hard to sell. There could be other issues as well, but your photos don't show the whole watch.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2023, 01:09 PM   #6
Cosmokramer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2023
Real Name: Mark
Location: Canada
Watch: Planet Ocean 2201
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan S View Post
I hesitate to generalize because this is such a personal thing. Some people can't tolerate any type of damage to the dial. But amongst people that can tolerate some patina/damage, I think that evenly spread or symmetrical damage is more often appreciated. Uneven damage, scratches, prominent marks/spots, blotches, stains, etc., are generally found to be less attractive.

Let's see what other people say, but you should really be prepared to follow your own feelings, don't base your decision on the opinions of others. But, yes, the damage on that dial is making the watch hard to sell. There could be other issues as well, but your photos don't show the whole watch.
There are 12 pics in the ad , I just had to crop these two pics heavily to upload them here. In my limited experience the case looks like it was worn and enjoyed but still ok. I don't mind scratches on the case as that tells a story of a tool watch that's 39 yrs old..
Cosmokramer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2023, 05:05 PM   #7
TuRo
"TRF" Member
 
TuRo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Real Name: Paul
Location: Cantabrigia - G.B
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 2,418
My ten cents and for a devils advocate....

Lacquer did this on some earliest 16800 gloss and 16760 I have seen - 5513 and 16750 more likely to spider

You only really see if at some angles.

It might get worse but I suspect not to affect of flaking.

Polishing - boring and you have the right attitude imho.

Tarnishing to hands is not too bad and have a good trit' lume nice matching shade.

The sapphire is scratched on right hand edge side but no biggy.

There are 3 main good points

1) it's very cheap £6000-6500 is £2-3k under retail (more than a gloss secondhand dial price btw).

2) HR markers are lovely shade.

3) gold bezel pip nice as per found on many 16800 pre 8.5 million matte dial versions btw.

Would I buy it for £6k if in UK - probably....if 93150, e/l's , cal, caseback are good, but I'm a mercenary value collector....so shouldn't sway your decision - Rgds P
__________________
These are the seasons of emotion
And like the wind, they rise and fall
This is the wonder of devotion
I see the torch, We all must hold
RAIN SONG - Led Zeppelin.
TuRo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2023, 05:10 PM   #8
Andad
2024 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,692
This package does nothing for me - I would pass.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2023, 05:20 PM   #9
TuRo
"TRF" Member
 
TuRo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Real Name: Paul
Location: Cantabrigia - G.B
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 2,418
Ps I just saw you comment '39 year old watch' - that would/might make it 84 or pre 8.5 million pls confirm ? - if so, it would have been a matte dial and this is therefore a service dial. If so you could source a matte dial.
I just sold a loose matte 16800 dial to Scott at VintageX for £1300, they aren't an arm and a leg.
__________________
These are the seasons of emotion
And like the wind, they rise and fall
This is the wonder of devotion
I see the torch, We all must hold
RAIN SONG - Led Zeppelin.
TuRo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2023, 06:11 PM   #10
joli160
2024 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,279
In my eyes it’s ugly, rather spent more for a good dial.
Guess i am not the only one since it is sitting for a long time without anybody buying it
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2023, 06:19 PM   #11
Arnozerosix
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: france
Posts: 169
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuRo View Post

Would I buy it for £6k if in UK - probably....if 93150, e/l's , cal, caseback are good, but I'm a mercenary value collector....so shouldn't sway your decision - Rgds P
Although 6k is not super expensive it deserve a nice service...
Not really sure, but the crystal looks damaged/scratched as well between 2 and 4 o'clock
Arnozerosix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2023, 06:42 PM   #12
charlitos
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: España
Posts: 178
No for me.
charlitos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2023, 09:24 PM   #13
tekno
2024 Pledge Member
 
tekno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Texas
Watch: Tudor Snowflake
Posts: 1,034
Get a matte 16800 or 168000 thank me later

I think that’s the model


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
tekno is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2023, 10:29 PM   #14
Cosmokramer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2023
Real Name: Mark
Location: Canada
Watch: Planet Ocean 2201
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuRo View Post
Ps I just saw you comment '39 year old watch' - that would/might make it 84 or pre 8.5 million pls confirm ? - if so, it would have been a matte dial and this is therefore a service dial. If so you could source a matte dial.
I just sold a loose matte 16800 dial to Scott at VintageX for £1300, they aren't an arm and a leg.
That's correct, 1984 and and 8.5 million serial number.
I was reading later versions of this model tranistioned to gloss dial with the hour marker rings. Would an '84 be in that time frame?
Cosmokramer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2023, 10:53 PM   #15
Cosmokramer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2023
Real Name: Mark
Location: Canada
Watch: Planet Ocean 2201
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuRo View Post
My ten cents and for a devils advocate....

Lacquer did this on some earliest 16800 gloss and 16760 I have seen - 5513 and 16750 more likely to spider

You only really see if at some angles.

It might get worse but I suspect not to affect of flaking.

Polishing - boring and you have the right attitude imho.

Tarnishing to hands is not too bad and have a good trit' lume nice matching shade.

The sapphire is scratched on right hand edge side but no biggy.

There are 3 main good points

1) it's very cheap £6000-6500 is £2-3k under retail (more than a gloss secondhand dial price btw).

2) HR markers are lovely shade.

3) gold bezel pip nice as per found on many 16800 pre 8.5 million matte dial versions btw.

Would I buy it for £6k if in UK - probably....if 93150, e/l's , cal, caseback are good, but I'm a mercenary value collector....so shouldn't sway your decision - Rgds P
If I were to purchase this piece the first thing I would do is get a new crystal without a cyclops. I can't stand them.
Cosmokramer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2023, 11:14 PM   #16
Dom9
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Real Name: Dom
Location: Surrey, UK
Watch: SD16600 & 9411
Posts: 292
Saw the first pic and thought "what's wrong with that?"... then I saw the second... oh!

I love a bit of patina but, yeah, that's a bit blotchy and uneven. Lots to like there though, from the limited pics, e.g. insert.

I'd think along the lines of TuRo... there looks to be value there, especially if you can knock a little more off.

Pick up a matte dial and maybe a NOS crystal and you'd still have your parts (dial, crystal) to sell on to offset, especially if the dial is a service dial anyway, so not original/no added value to keeping with the watch.

Would make a nice day-to-day 16800, I'd be only too happy to wear.
Dom9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2023, 11:19 PM   #17
ExplorerI
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: USA
Watch: Explorer I
Posts: 724
Not for me I’d wait for a better example
ExplorerI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2023, 12:09 AM   #18
Cosmokramer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2023
Real Name: Mark
Location: Canada
Watch: Planet Ocean 2201
Posts: 25
Pics of the case.
Scratches on a vintage tool watch don't bother me.
Can't tell if it's been polished recently. I don't expect a watch
of this age to be perfect and I'd assume it was polished
at some point many years ago. If it was polished by the original owner 25 yrs ago I'd have no issues with that. Polished just a couple years ago is different.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Screenshot_20230607_090118_Chrome~3.jpg (133.9 KB, 423 views)
File Type: jpg Screenshot_20230607_090106_Chrome~7.jpg (174.8 KB, 428 views)
File Type: jpg 1815246369~6.jpg (275.6 KB, 426 views)
File Type: jpg 1139955657~5.jpg (264.8 KB, 428 views)
File Type: jpg 487825639~3.jpg (234.7 KB, 426 views)

Last edited by Cosmokramer; 8 June 2023 at 12:26 AM.. Reason: Adding pictures
Cosmokramer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2023, 12:37 AM   #19
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,772
Big pass for me with that dial. I don't understand the mentality of making excuses for ugly dials by saying it's OK because it's not too expensive or that it's a cool vintage look. There's a reason it's priced that low and no one's bought it after four months on the market. Patina is nice and the case looks OK, but that dial.

OP, I'd suggest increasing your budget and getting a nicer version. They're out there. Or, since you don't like a cyclops, perhaps consider a 16660 SD if you're looking for an '80s Rolex dive watch, or even an early 16600.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TuRo View Post
Ps I just saw you comment '39 year old watch' - that would/might make it 84 or pre 8.5 million pls confirm ? - if so, it would have been a matte dial and this is therefore a service dial.
This is right at the cross-over. I always thought the glossy dials started right around 1984-5, no?
swish77 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2023, 02:04 AM   #20
77T
2024 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,569
Not a fan of that type of degraded dial.

If you saw this on the walls of your home, you wouldn’t think “patina”…




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2023, 02:37 AM   #21
TuRo
"TRF" Member
 
TuRo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Real Name: Paul
Location: Cantabrigia - G.B
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 2,418
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cosmokramer View Post
That's correct, 1984 and and 8.5 million serial number.
I was reading later versions of this model tranistioned to gloss dial with the hour marker rings. Would an '84 be in that time frame?
If low 8.5s could have been matte, but I'm more inclined to say gloss was original to watch given patina. You could fit a matte still and it would pass most people's muster....though most are up to 8.495 million I've seen/had.
__________________
These are the seasons of emotion
And like the wind, they rise and fall
This is the wonder of devotion
I see the torch, We all must hold
RAIN SONG - Led Zeppelin.
TuRo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2023, 02:39 AM   #22
Cosmokramer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2023
Real Name: Mark
Location: Canada
Watch: Planet Ocean 2201
Posts: 25
So with all the info provided, is it all but certain this is damage, and not simply age related?
Cosmokramer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2023, 03:54 AM   #23
TuRo
"TRF" Member
 
TuRo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Real Name: Paul
Location: Cantabrigia - G.B
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 2,418
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cosmokramer View Post
So with all the info provided, is it all but certain this is damage, and not simply age related?
My view is that is poor Rolex Quality Standards indicative of the early gloss dials and like the 5513/16750 which spidered. The lume plots and handset don't look particularly water damaged. Could be wrong though.
__________________
These are the seasons of emotion
And like the wind, they rise and fall
This is the wonder of devotion
I see the torch, We all must hold
RAIN SONG - Led Zeppelin.
TuRo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2023, 05:38 AM   #24
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,841
Case looks good to me. No way to tell what caused the dial damage but the cause doesn’t really matter. It is what it is … as they say.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2023, 06:14 AM   #25
swaini3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Mo
Location: Dubai
Watch: 1675 GMT, DRSD
Posts: 1,421
Price is not bad IMO. Not a fan of the dial. If everything else matches and is correct, I would consider buying it and waiting for a decent dial to be available if I can bear the headache, patience etc. On the other hand, generally it's not hard to find good examples of this ref with no dial issues.
swaini3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2023, 06:24 AM   #26
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuRo View Post
My view is that is poor Rolex Quality Standards indicative of the early gloss dials and like the 5513/16750 which spidered. The lume plots and handset don't look particularly water damaged. Could be wrong though.
Yes, many of these early gloss dials didn't age well, but what's weird is that you can also find them in perfect condition. I wonder if these dials were simply more vulnerable to mistreatment and the elements, but that watches that were well maintained and/or kept away from moisture/water, survived well.

Here's my 9.3 million 168000. The dial is squeaky clean, with a slight but even matte appearance at certain angles.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 168000 Open 9-TRF.jpg (280.7 KB, 369 views)
swish77 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2023, 11:12 AM   #27
Cosmokramer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2023
Real Name: Mark
Location: Canada
Watch: Planet Ocean 2201
Posts: 25
If this was send in for service to Rolex, would they replace the dial and handset?
Cosmokramer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2023, 12:16 PM   #28
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,841
Are you asking if they would require replacement or if they would give you the option? My guess is that they would require dial replacement but you would certainly have the option to do it.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2023, 10:59 PM   #29
Cosmokramer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2023
Real Name: Mark
Location: Canada
Watch: Planet Ocean 2201
Posts: 25
Thank you to all who replied to this thread. Learned a lot and that's why I'm here. Very helpful Information as I continue my quest for a vintage Rolex/Tudor Submariner.
Cosmokramer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2023, 10:06 AM   #30
Cosmokramer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2023
Real Name: Mark
Location: Canada
Watch: Planet Ocean 2201
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan S View Post
Are you asking if they would require replacement or if they would give you the option? My guess is that they would require dial replacement but you would certainly have the option to do it.
This one is still on my mine considering the price. If sent in for service would the dial replacement be tritium, or current luminous material?
Cosmokramer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.