The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 March 2019, 04:59 AM   #31
omx5o
"TRF" Member
 
omx5o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Richard
Location: UK
Watch: Milgauss GV
Posts: 1,611
Prepare yourself for a shock... there's been a gold sub for quite some time.
omx5o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:00 AM   #32
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,069
Quote:
Originally Posted by doramas View Post
It is a contradiction in my opinion. The watch tool concept is not compatible with gold. I think the same of
Submariner, but the SD is still less logical
It could be argued that gold is a superior metal for a dive watch. It is very corrosion resistant; many gold products and tools are still in use after hundreds, perhaps thousands in some cases, of years.

Gold is recognized as a superior metal for many industrial applications - it is the ultimate tool metal.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:01 AM   #33
PatronMTL
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Montreal
Posts: 433
Let’s be real who’s diving and going into decompression chambers wearing their seadweller?
__________________
BLNR (gone) - SS YMII (blue hands , gone) - TT SD43
PatronMTL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:01 AM   #34
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by doramas View Post
It is a contradiction in my opinion. The watch tool concept is not compatible with gold. I think the same of
Submariner, but the SD is still less logical
But nobody uses it as a tool. This is not a forum for professional divers that pay for their own equipment
Edit: I like it as the ”tool” all Rolex watches currently, a luxury item. So in that regard it actually makes more sense with a gold diver
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:02 AM   #35
Muxi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,823
Quote:
Originally Posted by doramas View Post
It is a contradiction in my opinion. The watch tool concept is not compatible with gold. I think the same of
Submariner, but the SD is still less logical
It’s okay. Let’s choose the references that sing to us.
Muxi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:02 AM   #36
Juantxo
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Utopia
Posts: 2,101
I think the Sea Dweller is being targeted for men, as the new Submariner: a larger watch following the trend of the compensation syndrome. The Submariner, then, is being left for women and men without a size complex thing. Just my $0.02.
Juantxo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:03 AM   #37
doramas
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
Quote:
Originally Posted by omx5o View Post
Prepare yourself for a shock... there's been a gold sub for quite some time.
Thanks for the information, I did not know.

I'm obviously being ironic
doramas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:05 AM   #38
strafer_kid
"TRF" Member
 
strafer_kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,127
I actually think it will do well.
strafer_kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:09 AM   #39
oldman2005
"TRF" Member
 
oldman2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: norcal
Posts: 3,031
Have you gotten your SS SD43 yet? I'd get it asap as Rolex has introduced this TT SD43 and may cut the production of SS SD43 to stimulate demand
oldman2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:09 AM   #40
doramas
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
Quote:
Originally Posted by capote View Post
But nobody uses it as a tool. This is not a forum for professional divers that pay for their own equipment
Edit: I like it as the ”tool” all Rolex watches currently, a luxury item. So in that regard it actually makes more sense with a gold diver
So that Rolex does not manufacture 1220m watches. Send a letter to Switzerland to open your eyes
doramas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:11 AM   #41
glamorama
"TRF" Member
 
glamorama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Dan
Location: Benelux
Posts: 1,919
I have a feeling TRF will initially be very disappointed with the new Sub when it comes. Something will be a little to shiny or not tooly enough ..
glamorama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:16 AM   #42
chris975d
"TRF" Member
 
chris975d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Winder, Georgia
Posts: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brew View Post
Rolex is only forcing some to see what the world already knows: It's jewelry.


This. Virtually no one uses these watches as “tools” anymore. The concept of a “tool watch” is long since gone. No one is buying a Rolex to use for their originally designed purpose. They are all wrist jewelry now, and that’s what sells. The vast majority of Rolex purchases (because of the name/branding/marketing) are bought as a showy display of wealth, so what better to do that than a larger, gold-ier diver?
chris975d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:19 AM   #43
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
The crab from Moana is going to love it.... and he lives in an oyster shell . Full disclosure i like it as much as any TT watch i have ever seen

__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:19 AM   #44
doramas
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris975d View Post
This. Virtually no one uses these watches as “tools” anymore. The concept of a “tool watch” is long since gone. No one is buying a Rolex to use for their originally designed purpose. They are all wrist jewelry now, and that’s what sells. The vast majority of Rolex purchases (because of the name/branding/marketing) are bought as a showy display of wealth, so what better to do that than a larger, gold-ier diver?
The essence of the brand was that. Watches tools
doramas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:20 AM   #45
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by doramas View Post
So that Rolex does not manufacture 1220m watches. Send a letter to Switzerland to open your eyes
The WR is a gimmick at this point.
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:20 AM   #46
avega357
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Miami
Watch: Rolex GMT's BLNR
Posts: 797
It takes the beauty of the SD 43 and cheapens it, but you should buy it because it will get discontinued in 3 years; do it will be a collectible piece




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
avega357 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:21 AM   #47
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris975d View Post
This. Virtually no one uses these watches as “tools” anymore. The concept of a “tool watch” is long since gone. No one is buying a Rolex to use for their originally designed purpose. They are all wrist jewelry now, and that’s what sells. The vast majority of Rolex purchases (because of the name/branding/marketing) are bought as a showy display of wealth, so what better to do that than a larger, gold-ier diver?
Exactly
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:22 AM   #48
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,069
Quote:
Originally Posted by glamorama View Post
I have a feeling TRF will initially be very disappointed with the new Sub when it comes. Something will be a little to shiny or not tooly enough ..
TRF!!! Please, we have over 200,000 members. Just like in any kindergarten there is always a small percentage that doesn't get it's way. That doesn't indict the entire class.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:22 AM   #49
avega357
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Miami
Watch: Rolex GMT's BLNR
Posts: 797
Quote:
Originally Posted by glamorama View Post
I have a feeling TRF will initially be very disappointed with the new Sub when it comes. Something will be a little to shiny or not tooly enough ..


Maybe but it will be hot. Unlike a TT SD 43


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
avega357 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:25 AM   #50
kls120
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: New York
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by doramas View Post
The essence of the brand was that. Watches tools
So by your own logic, TT SD43 will be a better tool for the essence of the brand, as gold is much superior metal for many industrial applications.
kls120 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:27 AM   #51
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,758
The SD line has always been the less popular serious diver. It has NEVER had any gold or PCLs on it thus didn't appeal to yuppies, used car salesmen, drug dealers or 'the office a-hole'. Until now. Is the HEV accented with gold? Haven't seen that side yet.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:27 AM   #52
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by doramas View Post
The essence of the brand was that. Watches tools
those days were long gone before the TT SD. ceramic bezels was probably it for a true tool. Personally, im fine with that.

They also use to be priced more in line with a tool too. They have the heritage still, but not the intent. Its a luxury watch, no question
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:27 AM   #53
doramas
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
Quote:
Originally Posted by avega357 View Post
It takes the beauty of the SD 43 and cheapens it, but you should buy it because it will get discontinued in 3 years; do it will be a collectible piece




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Already Rolex destroyed the classic design of the SD and now they manufacture it in gold. The Rolex course I do not like. I prefer the 4 and 5 digit references
doramas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:28 AM   #54
chris975d
"TRF" Member
 
chris975d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Winder, Georgia
Posts: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by doramas View Post
The essence of the brand was that. Watches tools


Yes, but that’s long gone. Most Rolex wearers no nothing of the history of the brand, only that Rolex is a show of affluence and the watch to have. You’d probably be surprised by how many Rolex owners don’t even know the name of the model they wear. I am pretty close friends with my AD, and also see Rolexes in my line of work on a daily basis more or less (in golf course operations..lots of money in golf). Just to strike up convo, when I see a Rolex I’ll often ask about it, along the lines of “oh, nice watch. What model is that?” (When I typically already know). Vast majority respond with “Rolex”. I’ll say, “I see that, but which model/reference?” To which I either get a blank stare, or “I don’t know, it’s a Rolex”. I’d say conservatively maybe 2 out of every 10 Rolex wearers I encounter can even talk watches like we do here.

So this is the target market this TT SD43 is made for...those that want a larger diver with more flash. Same reason the Sub has precious metals, this is just larger.
chris975d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:31 AM   #55
doramas
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
those days were long gone before the TT SD. ceramic bezels was probably it for a true tool. Personally, im fine with that.

They also use to be priced more in line with a tool too. They have the heritage still, but not the intent. Its a luxury watch, no question
That's why I prefer the 4 and 5 digit references
doramas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:32 AM   #56
Juantxo
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Utopia
Posts: 2,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by glamorama View Post
I have a feeling TRF will initially be very disappointed with the new Sub when it comes. Something will be a little to shiny or not tooly enough ..
The new Sub is the Sea Dweller.
Juantxo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:34 AM   #57
vipereaper30
2024 Pledge Member
 
vipereaper30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: BMF
Location: California USA
Watch: FPJ UTC
Posts: 2,246
It looks pretty awesome for TT but what confuses me is why there isn't a full gold model. That would really miff people and also look even better!
vipereaper30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:36 AM   #58
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by vipereaper30 View Post
It looks pretty awesome for TT but what confuses me is why there isn't a full gold model. That would really miff people and also look even better!
the weight of that would make me not even care it was a sea dweller.

by chance anyone know how much more a SS SD43 weighs than a SS sub?
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:37 AM   #59
TswaneNguni
"TRF" Member
 
TswaneNguni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onikage View Post
The SD line has always been the less popular serious diver. It has NEVER had any gold or PCLs on it thus didn't appeal to yuppies, used car salesmen, drug dealers or 'the office a-hole'. Until now. Is the HEV accented with gold? Haven't seen that side yet.
I appeals to me and I am neither of those .
TswaneNguni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2019, 05:37 AM   #60
rambo99
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Tokyo
Watch: SD43,PAM1616,Hulk
Posts: 3,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by vipereaper30 View Post
It looks pretty awesome for TT but what confuses me is why there isn't a full gold model. That would really miff people and also look even better!
the gold case would crushed into pieces at that depth rating.
rambo99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.