ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Etschell · 8 July 2022, 12:20 AM

per IG
1.jpg
2.jpg

Rags · 8 July 2022, 12:23 AM

Where did you see this?

monsieur_z · 8 July 2022, 12:32 AM

Nice if true

Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk

Lukebennett21 · 8 July 2022, 12:34 AM

Kind of boring, but not necessarily a bad thing. Bet it will be a strap monster!

Snikerdewdle · 8 July 2022, 12:40 AM

I wish it had a date, but at this point, I've accepted that most Tudors I like won't have one.

-dustin · 8 July 2022, 12:42 AM

This is one of the Tudors that I'm just kinda "meh" about.

douglasf13 · 8 July 2022, 12:53 AM

I think it’s a good looking, no-frills release. Still too big to me, but I’m assuming their marketing tells them otherwise. The bracelet vs dial size proportions of the original are just so much cooler.

Essentially, this is the new “Explorer 39,” which I’m ok with. Better to leave the Explorer at its original size.

Dan Pierce · 8 July 2022, 01:14 AM

The anti snowflake clique will have to find another dead horse to beat.
dP

Spartyfan6262 · 8 July 2022, 01:16 AM

I actually prefer the looks of the prior Tudor Ranger. This one sort of looks like a Ranger dial and handset in a Rolex OP case.

mgsooner · 8 July 2022, 01:19 AM

....yikes

Potawatomi · 8 July 2022, 01:22 AM

I'm happy if this is the real release, it's so boring that I have zero interest and I don't have to bother going to the AD to get on another list.

alllexandru · 8 July 2022, 01:27 AM

Boring kinda...

douglasf13 · 8 July 2022, 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spartyfan6262

I actually prefer the looks of the prior Tudor Ranger. This one sort of looks like a Ranger dial and handset in a Rolex OP case.

I mean, that’s essentially what the original Ranger was.

I think this is one of the better looking Tudors.

KVNNSCHNG · 8 July 2022, 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Pierce

The anti snowflake clique will have to find another dead horse to beat.
dP

dannyp · 8 July 2022, 01:43 AM

Wish it came in 36, with the newer style crown that resembles a Rolex twin-lock. However seems to make a good successor to the Explorer 39 that many lament…

brandrea · 8 July 2022, 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Pierce

The anti snowflake clique will have to find another dead horse to beat.
dP

Slimpee · 8 July 2022, 01:46 AM

Do we know the size of the case or are we just guessing?

I cannot read the text in the picture.

dafuture · 8 July 2022, 01:46 AM

Isn't this basically identical to the last one? I would've hoped for a bit more...flair.

Wish they didn't do the red tipped second hand either, I always hate that detail.

Spartyfan6262 · 8 July 2022, 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by douglasf13

I mean, that’s essentially what the original Ranger was.

I think this is one of the better looking Tudors.

You raise an excellent point, Douglas.

kieselguhr · 8 July 2022, 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Pierce

The anti snowflake clique will have to find another dead horse to beat.
dP

Oh pretty sure they will Dan

C0d · 8 July 2022, 01:56 AM

A new watch by Tudor...

douglasf13 · 8 July 2022, 01:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spartyfan6262

You raise an excellent point, Douglas.

Although it’s a little big to me, personally, I know I’m a weird in that regard, and I think this is about as good as we could hope from a new Ranger. It’s a nice, simple, field/“gentleman’s” watch with a long history.

Mo_Mo_86 · 8 July 2022, 02:00 AM

If its only this i’ll be disappointed! Where’s the polar dial, ranger, north flag, pro we all want

Spartyfan6262 · 8 July 2022, 02:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by douglasf13

Although it’s a little big to me, personally, I know I’m a weird in that regard, and I think this is about as good as we could hope from a new Ranger. It’s a nice, simple, field/“gentleman’s” watch with a long history.

Agree. If I had control of the project, I would have updated the old Tudor Ranger 7995/0. But maybe that is too close to the Rolex Explorer.

douglasf13 · 8 July 2022, 02:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spartyfan6262

Agree. If I had control of the project, I would have updated the old Tudor Ranger 7995/0. But maybe that is too close to the Rolex Explorer.

Yeah, that's why I feel like this is about as close as we'd get. At least it doesn't appear to be 41mm like the last one. Can you imagine if they had the guts to release it in 34mm?!

AzHadEnuf · 8 July 2022, 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Pierce

The anti snowflake clique will have to find another dead horse to beat.
dP

Snowflake or no Snowflake Dan, it’s still a “Poor Mans Rolex”.

carwash66 · 8 July 2022, 02:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Pierce

The anti snowflake clique will have to find another dead horse to beat.
dP

Great point!!

Pinchy · 8 July 2022, 02:35 AM

I don't want a polar bb pro. I think this will be a hit. But I feel these are fake.

I think tudor would not ditch the faux rivets on such a piece, and Tudor likes applied indices, so it's slightly odd to me that it would be printed indices. Not impossible, but it would be a step in a different direction.

X E L O R · 8 July 2022, 02:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dafuture

Isn't this basically identical to the last one? I would've hoped for a bit more...flair.

Wish they didn't do the red tipped second hand either, I always hate that detail.

39mm confirmed

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

X E L O R · 8 July 2022, 02:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slimpee

Do we know the size of the case or are we just guessing?

I cannot read the text in the picture.

39mm confirmed by my AD and they have them in store now for tomorrow’s launch

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

8 July 2022, 12:20 AM	#1
Etschell "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: FL Watch: platinum sub Posts: 15,884	New Tudor Ranger per IG 1.jpg 2.jpg __________________ If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4.

8 July 2022, 12:23 AM	#2
Rags 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Chuck Location: SW Florida Watch: 16233,16610,214270 Posts: 11,183	Where did you see this? __________________ 16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer *114300 Oyster Perpetual* *76200 Tudor Date+Day*

8 July 2022, 01:14 AM	#8
Dan Pierce 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: D'OH! Location: Kentucky Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3 Posts: 35,733	The anti snowflake clique will have to find another dead horse to beat. dP __________________ TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club

8 July 2022, 01:19 AM	#10
mgsooner "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2018 Real Name: Matthew Location: Tulsa, OK, USA Posts: 1,907	....yikes __________________ \|Rolex Submariner 114060\|Rolex Datejust 126234 silver dial\| \|Tudor Heritage Chrono 70330B\| \|Grand Seiko SBGT021 day-date quartz\|

8 July 2022, 01:46 AM	#18
dafuture "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Location: NYC Posts: 1,943	Isn't this basically identical to the last one? I would've hoped for a bit more...flair. Wish they didn't do the red tipped second hand either, I always hate that detail. __________________ Current Rolex Submariner 126610LN \|\| Cartier Tank Americaine

8 July 2022, 12:32 AM	#3
monsieur_z 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2021 Location: Singapore Posts: 365	Nice if true Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk

8 July 2022, 12:34 AM	#4
Lukebennett21 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2020 Location: US Posts: 419	Kind of boring, but not necessarily a bad thing. Bet it will be a strap monster!

8 July 2022, 12:40 AM	#5
Snikerdewdle "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2019 Location: Arlington VA Posts: 11	I wish it had a date, but at this point, I've accepted that most Tudors I like won't have one.

8 July 2022, 12:42 AM	#6
-dustin 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2019 Real Name: Dustin Location: A, TX Posts: 1,571	This is one of the Tudors that I'm just kinda "meh" about.

8 July 2022, 12:53 AM	#7
douglasf13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: USA Posts: 5,615	I think it’s a good looking, no-frills release. Still too big to me, but I’m assuming their marketing tells them otherwise. The bracelet vs dial size proportions of the original are just so much cooler. Essentially, this is the new “Explorer 39,” which I’m ok with. Better to leave the Explorer at its original size.

8 July 2022, 01:16 AM	#9
Spartyfan6262 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2019 Location: New York Posts: 153	I actually prefer the looks of the prior Tudor Ranger. This one sort of looks like a Ranger dial and handset in a Rolex OP case.

8 July 2022, 01:22 AM	#11
Potawatomi "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2019 Location: Arizona Posts: 812	I'm happy if this is the real release, it's so boring that I have zero interest and I don't have to bother going to the AD to get on another list.

8 July 2022, 01:27 AM	#12
alllexandru 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Old continent Posts: 2,317	Boring kinda...

8 July 2022, 01:43 AM	#15
dannyp Banned Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: usa Posts: 6,765	Wish it came in 36, with the newer style crown that resembles a Rolex twin-lock. However seems to make a good successor to the Explorer 39 that many lament…

8 July 2022, 01:46 AM	#17
Slimpee 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2020 Location: Midwest, USA Watch: DJ 41; 1803; BB Ch Posts: 1,284	Do we know the size of the case or are we just guessing? I cannot read the text in the picture.

8 July 2022, 01:56 AM	#21
C0d Banned Join Date: Jun 2020 Location: Kanata Watch: Dog Posts: 815	A new watch by Tudor...

8 July 2022, 02:00 AM	#23
Mo_Mo_86 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2019 Location: Wales Posts: 128	If its only this i’ll be disappointed! Where’s the polar dial, ranger, north flag, pro we all want

8 July 2022, 02:35 AM	#28
Pinchy "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2021 Location: California Posts: 590	I don't want a polar bb pro. I think this will be a hit. But I feel these are fake. I think tudor would not ditch the faux rivets on such a piece, and Tudor likes applied indices, so it's slightly odd to me that it would be printed indices. Not impossible, but it would be a step in a different direction.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)