ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 July 2022, 02:29 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Atlanta area
Watch: anything 36mm
Posts: 134
|
Comparing Explorers: 14270 vs 124270
Below are a couple of visual comparisons between my old 14270 (U serial circa 1999) vs my latest acquisition 124270 (purchased 2022).
|
17 July 2022, 02:31 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Atlanta area
Watch: anything 36mm
Posts: 134
|
I didn’t make an actual measurement of the case but it looks a wee bit thicker
|
17 July 2022, 02:36 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Atlanta area
Watch: anything 36mm
Posts: 134
|
Outside of the lumed numerals, the lug width and bracelet taper of 124270 really transform the proportions of the newer Explorer vs the older models. I now have a greater appreciation for the subtle changes Rolex makes as the product line evolves
|
17 July 2022, 02:39 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Rhode Island
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 349
|
Thanks for the comparison pictures!
Clearly there are differences, but they’re subtle. |
17 July 2022, 02:44 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Atlanta area
Watch: anything 36mm
Posts: 134
|
The lumed numerals where honestly the only reason I switched to the 124270. As attached as I was to my 14270, the lack of lume in the numerals (unlike the 1016) was a flagrant omission by Rolex, otherwise it was in my opinion the perfect watch
|
17 July 2022, 02:55 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,615
|
The lume is the only thing I miss with the newer one, but it’s not enough, for me. I can still read the old style fine in the dark.
|
17 July 2022, 03:04 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 25,997
|
Only thing that would be a separator for me would be the presence of lugholes.
I’ve put my 114270 on a leather strap and Tudor deployant. Tilted it toward bit more dressy, really like it that way and it compliments the smaller size than I typically wear.
__________________
|
17 July 2022, 03:28 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Canada
Watch: 16610, 124270
Posts: 316
|
Thanks for posting. I also prefer the color of the new Chromalite display!
|
17 July 2022, 04:34 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: Rollie
Posts: 680
|
It's marginal but I think I prefer the current 124270. I'm just glad it's offered in 36mm diameter size again.
|
17 July 2022, 07:41 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Atlanta area
Watch: anything 36mm
Posts: 134
|
Quote:
Fun Fact: the lug mounting points on the 114270 are closer to the case than on the 14270, so the older 14270 are much more friendlier to straps because the increased clearance |
|
17 July 2022, 08:08 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 25,997
|
Dressed up
__________________
|
17 July 2022, 09:02 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,615
|
FWIW, I believe the thickness of the two is supposed to be about the same. It looks like they may be seated differently in that pic.
|
17 July 2022, 10:47 PM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Real Name: Paul
Location: ohio
Watch: 16570 black
Posts: 441
|
Nice pics and interesting comparisons. I have to say I'm partial to the 14270 but both are really nice.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.