ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 September 2019, 02:35 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,300
|
Stolen DD Sold @ Action BUT they won't...
https://youtu.be/8BpAihK7GZs
Sorry if this is a double post. Thought it would be good to share. Please see link above. Auction house in United kingdom who's name Paul won't mention in the video, at least not yet, sold a buyer a platinum Day date which he was purchasing for his wife, that ended up being stolen. They refuse to give him his money back and they refuse to even return the commission, simply pointing to their "terms and conditions" in attempts to deny any responsibility.... |
16 September 2019, 02:43 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,113
|
A reckoning is coming down the pike with auction houses. Look for an exclusive credential coming soon for proper watch auction 'houses'. If I were a Sothebys, or Christie's or Phillips I'd get together on a shared code of conduct asap and corner the market. Weed out the bad players.
|
16 September 2019, 02:53 AM | #3 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,344
|
That's bad, I hope buyer gets reimbursed.
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
16 September 2019, 06:54 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Virginia
Posts: 253
|
If auction house still had it in their possession it should be their responsibility. If buyer had it in his possession it is on him.
|
16 September 2019, 06:57 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Virginia
Posts: 253
|
If it was stolen property that the auction house sold it ought to be on the auction house. Aren’t they responsible for some kind of due diligence ?
|
16 September 2019, 07:00 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Paris
Posts: 3,530
|
I tried watching the video, but he's talking in a mic and the sound is still horrible.
|
16 September 2019, 07:23 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,036
|
Watch it on speaker or put both headphones in. Something up with volume for sure
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
16 September 2019, 07:50 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Yes, it is !
Location: Cheshire & Mersey
Watch: Military issue Sub
Posts: 1,319
|
The messenger's purpose may be to raise his profile more than to help a stranger.
Laws on title, liability and so on in the UK are well established and enforced. Nemo dat quod non habet. If the report has a basis of truth, it may be that the auction house is waiting (perhaps as per their Ts & Cs) for more details of the records relating to the watch to be confirmed, to see if the watch can be confirmed to be stolen. Many watches have been reported stolen fraudulently (their owners themselves having sold them before or after the reports) or are legitimately recovered after loss, but without being removed from the stolen lists. In short, a watch appearing on a stolen list is commonly not correctly there. Only this week I had a positive match on a GMT-Master II 16713......which had previously been recovered by my staff only a year before, when offered in-store and they held it. We thereafter legitimately purchased it from the insurers of the victim, with his full agreement, but no-one had confirmed it with the relevant stolen register, so it flagged again when we checked it before sale. 48 hours later and it's all sorted. The auction house may be very willing to refund a watch if it is confirmed to be subject of a live and correct stolen claim, but that can take some days at least to establish. I disagree with the messenger's claim that it will take a year and the watch will "inevitably" be lost. That is demonstrable nonsense. The last couple of years I have lectured the UK's police forces on high value watch crime and could write pages on the subject, with examples. I regularly advise individual forces, insurers, asset recovery teams, POCA investigators and others. With the full facts, it is unlikely there would be much room for uncertainty as to liability here. Without knowing the facts of this specific case, all pitch-forks should be returned to the shed. I'll be surprised if the circumstances are entirely as presented but let's see. H
__________________
*Comex:5513,5514,1665x2,16800x2,16600 *Mil sub:5517x2,5513x9,5512 *Submariner:6536/1x2,5508,5513 PCG u/line & double SWISS (America's Cup),5513 giltx2, 5513 m-firstx2,5513 gloss WGx2,1680 Red,1680 White Mk1 & Mk2 *Sea-Dweller:1665 DRSDx3,Great Whitex3 *GMT-Master:6542x2 (1 Bakelite),1675x8 (2 gilt), 16750 & SeaKing 116710LN *Explorer:1016x6 (1 gilt),5500x3,14270 Blackout, Orange 1655 x4 *Milgauss 1019x3 *Cosmo 6263 *RNCD DSSD 116660. |
16 September 2019, 09:07 AM | #9 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Florida, USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/Vin Omega
Posts: 1,972
|
Quote:
I saw Paul's vid and felt horrible for his subscriber. I hope other youtubers get wind and make vids too, so their subs can find also out. Hope the auction house comes to their senses. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.