ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

jjnd08 · 30 December 2014, 07:12 AM

I like the look of the ND better.

Brian Page · 30 December 2014, 07:38 AM

They are both great but I went with the ND because I like the balance and I have a cyclops on my BLNR. If I didn't have the BLNR it would be a tough call.

Good Luck!

Pattyb69 · 30 December 2014, 07:38 AM

When it comes to Subs, I always preferred the no date for its cleaner dial... Every other Rolex watch, I prefer with the date. I cant explain why

Brian Page · 30 December 2014, 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dysondiver

date , but remove the cyclops ,,, best of both ,,, or if you prefer , worst of both.

Teddy Bear · 30 December 2014, 08:06 AM

No Date for sure! I like it simple and shiny ;)

Sixshooter · 30 December 2014, 08:27 AM

I prefer to have a date on my Sub, but the ND's sure do look clean.

ocean2059 · 30 December 2014, 08:36 AM

I was in a similar situation but finally decided to go with ND. I am very happy the current model.

illiguy · 30 December 2014, 12:44 PM

I like both, but prefer the date. Also, make sure it's 2.5x on the cyclops if you do get one - seems to be an issue of late with Rolex.

GradyPhilpott · 30 December 2014, 01:21 PM

It's as simple as this: The Submariner has no date.

If you choose to have a Submariner with a date, then you'll have to buy a Submariner Date.

I know this may confuse you, but it's as simple as it gets.

A Submariner has no date.

Eric Chan · 30 December 2014, 05:06 PM

In the past, I would have chosen the date model. But now, I am not so sure. Ever since the 114060 was released, the look of that watch has just grown on me. Also, taking into account the upgrades the the bracelet and clasp of the 114060, it by far surpasses it's predecessor.

With that being said, if this was your only Rolex, a date function may be the more logical choice, but I would still go for the 114060 because of the pure, simple and clean look of the watch.

mailman · 30 December 2014, 11:20 PM

Sub Date. I use the my watch to tell the date quite often. Plus I like the AR cyclops.

Danex · 31 December 2014, 01:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott

It's as simple as this: The Submariner has no date.

If you choose to have a Submariner with a date, then you'll have to buy a Submariner Date.

I know this may confuse you, but it's as simple as it gets.

A Submariner has no date.

Grady speaks the truth.

For me, I have two Sumariners, they are that awesome.
When I want a date function, I wear a Yacht-Master, which is a very fancy Submariner Date.

30 December 2014, 08:27 AM	#66
Sixshooter "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Caleb Location: Lubbock TX. USA Watch: Crude Prices Posts: 1,103	I prefer to have a date on my Sub, but the ND's sure do look clean. __________________ - VC - AP - Rolex - Omega

30 December 2014, 01:21 PM	#69
GradyPhilpott 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: 116710 BLNR Posts: 34,347	It's as simple as this: The Submariner has no date. If you choose to have a Submariner with a date, then you'll have to buy a Submariner Date. I know this may confuse you, but it's as simple as it gets. A Submariner has no date. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

30 December 2014, 05:06 PM	#70
Eric Chan "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Eric Chan Location: Vancouver, BC CAN Watch: Day-Date 118238 Posts: 8,798	In the past, I would have chosen the date model. But now, I am not so sure. Ever since the 114060 was released, the look of that watch has just grown on me. Also, taking into account the upgrades the the bracelet and clasp of the 114060, it by far surpasses it's predecessor. With that being said, if this was your only Rolex, a date function may be the more logical choice, but I would still go for the 114060 because of the pure, simple and clean look of the watch. __________________ Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016

30 December 2014, 11:20 PM	#71
mailman TRF Moderator & DATE-JUST41 2024 Patron Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: . Watch: 126610LN Posts: 35,359	Sub Date. I use the my watch to tell the date quite often. Plus I like the AR cyclops. __________________ JJ

30 December 2014, 07:12 AM	#61
jjnd08 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: United States Posts: 8,605	I like the look of the ND better.

30 December 2014, 07:38 AM	#62
Brian Page "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: USA Posts: 6,527	They are both great but I went with the ND because I like the balance and I have a cyclops on my BLNR. If I didn't have the BLNR it would be a tough call. Good Luck!

30 December 2014, 07:38 AM	#63
Pattyb69 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Location: CT Watch: BLNR\|LVC\|PAM 911 Posts: 1,085	When it comes to Subs, I always preferred the no date for its cleaner dial... Every other Rolex watch, I prefer with the date. I cant explain why

30 December 2014, 08:06 AM	#65
Teddy Bear "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: USA Watch: Sub 114060 Posts: 7	No Date for sure! I like it simple and shiny ;)

30 December 2014, 08:36 AM	#67
ocean2059 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: US Watch: Chronograph Posts: 81	I was in a similar situation but finally decided to go with ND. I am very happy the current model.

30 December 2014, 12:44 PM	#68
illiguy 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: UTC/GMT -5 Posts: 3,463	I like both, but prefer the date. Also, make sure it's 2.5x on the cyclops if you do get one - seems to be an issue of late with Rolex.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)