The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 18 March 2017, 12:20 PM   #1
Ttpwatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 20
Bracelet for 16753, 14 k or 18k?

I have 16753 serial number 6.2xx but it doesn't have bracelet.
One say it might have 14 k 78363 bracelet because it comes before 1982.
Another one say it might have 18k bracelet because it is 16753 not 1675/3.
I want to know what is correct?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_4269.jpg (69.5 KB, 176 views)
Ttpwatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2017, 01:11 PM   #2
Richard Carver
"TRF" Member
 
Richard Carver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 2,237
5 digit ref 18k, 4 digit ref 14k
Richard Carver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2017, 03:10 PM   #3
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,193
Question for Richard...


In the past, I've seen E and F Jubilee coded 62513 clasps with 14K stamps. These would be 1980/81 clasps. What would these clasps be for - Datejusts? I believe I might even have a couple of them now.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2017, 04:52 PM   #4
Richard Carver
"TRF" Member
 
Richard Carver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 2,237
Have you ever seen a 16753 with a 14k bezel? We've all learned to never say never with Rolex and mixing 14 and 18k doesn't sound very Rolex like. Did Rolex use up 14k marked clasps? Did dealers do it? :)

The intent was to make the change to 18k with the introduction of the 5 digit ref. If there are some strays with mixed metal from the factory that's unfortunate. If I had a 16753 I would be extremely unhappy with a 14k bracelet.
Richard Carver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2017, 06:51 PM   #5
Ttpwatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 20
Thank you very much
Ttpwatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2017, 11:32 AM   #6
Richard Carver
"TRF" Member
 
Richard Carver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 2,237
I can't count the times vintage Rolex has kicked my ass and here we are again. My apologies to Springer who is correct in his experiences. I did some research and the very first 16753 I found had a 14k bezel.

So to the OP, whatever caret your bezel is the bracelet should match. There are visual cues, the 14k knurling is nubby in appearance and 18k is scalloped like a sub.

If you can't change your mind when reality is stabbing you in the eye you probably shouldn't fool with vintage Rolex (or politics:).
Richard Carver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2017, 01:28 PM   #7
R.W.T.
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,973
As I said over there...


A 16753 or 1675/3 or 1601 or whatever...will be 18k in Europe since time immemorial.

That is what I have been told. Glad to be proven wrong.

But in answer to your question.... or rather to solve the issue...unless you have USA papers...or Rolex is willing to say the watch originated in the US...you could easily have 18k parts and I wouldn't care one iota.
R.W.T. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2017, 01:29 PM   #8
R.W.T.
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Carver View Post
Have you ever seen a 16753 with a 14k bezel? We've all learned to never say never with Rolex and mixing 14 and 18k doesn't sound very Rolex like. Did Rolex use up 14k marked clasps? Did dealers do it? :)

The intent was to make the change to 18k with the introduction of the 5 digit ref. If there are some strays with mixed metal from the factory that's unfortunate. If I had a 16753 I would be extremely unhappy with a 14k bracelet.
I had a 16013 with 14k parts. Band and bezel and crown.
R.W.T. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2017, 02:14 PM   #9
Richard Carver
"TRF" Member
 
Richard Carver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 2,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by R.W.T. View Post
I had a 16013 with 14k parts. Band and bezel and crown.
Exactly, without papers it's impossible to tell. I've never seen an 18k TT 1601 from anywhere. I understood in England they weren't allowed to call it gold and had to refer to it as bi-metal but it was 14k.

Tommy, imagine how many more SS 1675 will hit the market when Rolex stops servicing the 1570. TT 1675 will be converted in droves. No longer any way to tell. :)
Richard Carver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2017, 03:00 PM   #10
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Carver View Post
Exactly, without papers it's impossible to tell. I've never seen an 18k TT 1601 from anywhere. I understood in England they weren't allowed to call it gold and had to refer to it as bi-metal but it was 14k.

Tommy, imagine how many more SS 1675 will hit the market when Rolex stops servicing the 1570. TT 1675 will be converted in droves. No longer any way to tell. :)
I remember back during the 1980s and 1990s when the stainless steel watches were converted in "droves" to stainless/14K or stainless/18k.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2017, 03:17 PM   #11
Richard Carver
"TRF" Member
 
Richard Carver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 2,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
I remember back during the 1980s and 1990s when the stainless steel watches were converted in "droves" to stainless/14K or stainless/18k.
LOL. that's why the originality fetish drives me nuts. I hate watching guys pass on nice watches for fear the spring bars might not be 'original' :)
Richard Carver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2017, 03:35 PM   #12
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Carver View Post
LOL. that's why the originality fetish drives me nuts. I hate watching guys pass on nice watches for fear the spring bars might not be 'original' :)
Or....that darn date wheel...those comments always make me chuckle.

By the way Richard, my wife still owns her ladies two-tone Datejust conversion she got back in the 90s at Dallas Gold and Silver. It has since been retired for a stainless model.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2017, 04:30 PM   #13
R.W.T.
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
I remember back during the 1980s and 1990s when the stainless steel watches were converted in "droves" to stainless/14K or stainless/18k.
It was even promoted by the Rolex rep.

The stores had the parts...if your customer wanted steel and gold but was hedging on the funds get them into a Rolex at any cost by selling the stainless and telling them they could "upgrade later" with factory parts right here at your store. I have it from the horse's mouth...no questions.
R.W.T. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2017, 01:08 AM   #14
Ttpwatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 20
Thank you very much for all opinions
Ttpwatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.