ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

dbhak22 · 17 January 2018, 03:48 AM

Sixteenth edition of the "VERSUS" post/picture. What is "VERSUS"? Well, I thought it would be fun to compare two watches (and only those two watches) and discuss pros/cons by outlining the differences and getting folks' ideas/thoughts/opinions on TRF. We got folks here that have been collecting and studying these things for decades and those who are just starting to venture into the crazy world of Rolex (and everyone in between). Therefore, it would be fun and educational!

For this edition, we have a showdown of a couple Submariners with dates. A Submariner reference 1680 and a reference 16800.

Which do you prefer and why?

Previous VERSUS:
1. VERSUS: Submariner 1680 v. 16610
2. VERSUS: Rolex Submariner and Sea-Dweller 16610LV and 126600
3. VERSUS: Rolex Submariner 16610s
4. VERSUS: Sea (Deepsea 116660) to Sky (Explorer 1016)
5. VERSUS: Submariners Vintage and Modern
6. VERSUS: Datejusts with Unique Dials
7. VERSUS: Vintage Submariners
8. VERSUS: Vintage GMTs
9. VERSUS: 5-digit Sub and GMT
10. VERSUS: Special Edition Modern Sea-Dwellers
11. VERSUS: A Touch of Red (GMT-Master / Sea-Dweller)
12. VERSUS: Vintage Mk1 Sport Models (1675 and 1680)
13. VERSUS: Stainless Steel and Two-Tone Datejust
14. VERSUS: 1960s Dress and Sport
15. VERSUS: Semi-Modern GMTs

douglasf13 · 17 January 2018, 04:17 AM

Because of the practicality of sapphire, I could maybe see going that direction if this was a matte dial 16800, but, in this case, 1680 all the way...actually, I'd still go 1680 in either case. The subtle differences make a difference, like the more compact bezel profile and whatnot.

Colin10101 · 17 January 2018, 04:26 AM

My god that 1680 is glorious. The dial makes the difference for me here.

Tom1675 · 17 January 2018, 05:22 AM

That's a great 1680, all the way for me. Anything with white gold is not my cup of tea.

cowboy music · 17 January 2018, 05:36 AM

The 1680. The bezel is fabulous with the more pronounced indentions. The larger lume plots really pop. And I like the dial font for the Rolex logo and how it's closer to the center post. All in all looks much better.

springer · 17 January 2018, 06:06 AM

What's the prize if we are correct?

Cortezthekiller · 17 January 2018, 06:36 AM

larger plots on the 1680

dbhak22 · 17 January 2018, 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colin10101

My god that 1680 is glorious. The dial makes the difference for me here.

Why thank you! :)

You'll hate me for telling you that I found it at an antiques fair (fancy name for a flea market)...

dbhak22 · 17 January 2018, 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by springer

What's the prize if we are correct?

That's a trick question as there is no correct answer John! :)

dbhak22 · 17 January 2018, 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cowboy music

The 1680. The bezel is fabulous with the more pronounced indentions. The larger lume plots really pop. And I like the dial font for the Rolex logo and how it's closer to the center post. All in all looks much better.

Yes, you'll some bezels have been polished heavily which leads to the "teeth" being soft/rounded down...but this bezel is nice and sharp, :)

springer · 17 January 2018, 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbhak22

That's a trick question as there is no correct answer John! :)

Really...I didn't know. Then I'll go for the Sub.

schoolboy · 17 January 2018, 09:59 AM

Cool thread!

I'm going to be checking out some of the "Previous VERSUS" threads.

I'm here to learn

Many thanks !

sillo · 17 January 2018, 10:07 AM

If it was matte I'd go 16800, but in this case 1680.

dbhak22 · 17 January 2018, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by schoolboy

Cool thread!

I'm going to be checking out some of the "Previous VERSUS" threads.

I'm here to learn

Many thanks !

Be a sponge Jesus! SO MUCH to learn...part of the fun of this crazy hobby, :)

schoolboy · 3 April 2018, 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbhak22

Be a sponge Jesus! SO MUCH to learn...part of the fun of this crazy hobby, :)

Thanks

The more I learn, the more I realize that there is more to learn !

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

pc109 · 3 April 2018, 12:27 PM

Can we get Versus photos comparing the side profiles which show off the unique top hat crystal of the 1680? This reason, along with those mentioned above, is why I chose the 1680 over any 16800.

blowfish89 · 7 April 2018, 01:54 PM

Well I made my choice with the matte dial 16800, it’s my one watch. The 1680s look fabulous but some 16800s have deeper patina which I prefer (I don’t know why this happens as 1680s are older). 16800s are also thinner and okay to swim with without much worry. The top hat acrylic has its own charm though :)

dbhak22 · 10 April 2018, 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blowfish89

Well I made my choice with the matte dial 16800, it’s my one watch. The 1680s look fabulous but some 16800s have deeper patina which I prefer (I don’t know why this happens as 1680s are older). 16800s are also thinner and okay to swim with without much worry. The top hat acrylic has its own charm though :)

Fantastic example you got there!

Beckster · 11 April 2018, 03:52 AM

Wow. No comparison for me. 1680 all the way!

17 January 2018, 03:48 AM	#1
dbhak22 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Real Name: Daniel Location: PNW Watch: ♛ Posts: 2,960	VERSUS: Submariner Date Siblings Sixteenth edition of the "VERSUS" post/picture. What is "VERSUS"? Well, I thought it would be fun to compare two watches (and only those two watches) and discuss pros/cons by outlining the differences and getting folks' ideas/thoughts/opinions on TRF. We got folks here that have been collecting and studying these things for decades and those who are just starting to venture into the crazy world of Rolex (and everyone in between). Therefore, it would be fun and educational! For this edition, we have a showdown of a couple Submariners with dates. A Submariner reference 1680 and a reference 16800. Which do you prefer and why? Previous VERSUS: 1. VERSUS: Submariner 1680 v. 16610 2. VERSUS: Rolex Submariner and Sea-Dweller 16610LV and 126600 3. VERSUS: Rolex Submariner 16610s 4. VERSUS: Sea (Deepsea 116660) to Sky (Explorer 1016) 5. VERSUS: Submariners Vintage and Modern 6. VERSUS: Datejusts with Unique Dials 7. VERSUS: Vintage Submariners 8. VERSUS: Vintage GMTs 9. VERSUS: 5-digit Sub and GMT 10. VERSUS: Special Edition Modern Sea-Dwellers 11. VERSUS: A Touch of Red (GMT-Master / Sea-Dweller) 12. VERSUS: Vintage Mk1 Sport Models (1675 and 1680) 13. VERSUS: Stainless Steel and Two-Tone Datejust 14. VERSUS: 1960s Dress and Sport 15. VERSUS: Semi-Modern GMTs __________________ GMT II (16710) \| Explorer I (1016) \| Datejust I (116234) \| Submariner (1680) \| Day-Date (1803) \| Royal Oak (25594) \| FOIS (2998 spec) \| Submariner (16808)

17 January 2018, 04:26 AM	#3
Colin10101 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Real Name: Colin Location: Toronto Watch: 16710 Posts: 1,336	My god that 1680 is glorious. The dial makes the difference for me here. __________________ Rolex GMT-Master II 16710 "Z" Serial COKE Montblanc 1858 Iced Sea *BLACK*

17 January 2018, 06:06 AM	#6
springer 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: jP Location: Texas Watch: GMT-MASTER Posts: 17,196	What's the prize if we are correct? __________________ Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.

17 January 2018, 06:36 AM	#7
Cortezthekiller "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: USA Posts: 234	larger plots on the 1680 __________________ Rolex 16753 Rootbeer GMT, 16803 Submariner Accutron Swiss Spaceview N3 Movado Astronic HS360 01.0010.436 Omega Flightmaster 145.036, 145.012 Speedmaster Enicar Sherpa Guide MKII

17 January 2018, 10:07 AM	#13
sillo "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Real Name: Sean Location: NY Watch: 5 Digit Posts: 2,840	If it was matte I'd go 16800, but in this case 1680. __________________ 14060 \| 16570 \| 16600 \| 16700 \| 16800 \| 79260 @TheGMTHand

17 January 2018, 04:17 AM	#2
douglasf13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: USA Posts: 5,615	Because of the practicality of sapphire, I could maybe see going that direction if this was a matte dial 16800, but, in this case, 1680 all the way...actually, I'd still go 1680 in either case. The subtle differences make a difference, like the more compact bezel profile and whatnot.

17 January 2018, 05:22 AM	#4
Tom1675 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Real Name: Tom Location: Los Angeles Posts: 1,172	That's a great 1680, all the way for me. Anything with white gold is not my cup of tea.

17 January 2018, 05:36 AM	#5
cowboy music "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Location: Texas Watch: 5513 Posts: 133	The 1680. The bezel is fabulous with the more pronounced indentions. The larger lume plots really pop. And I like the dial font for the Rolex logo and how it's closer to the center post. All in all looks much better.

17 January 2018, 09:59 AM	#12
schoolboy Banned Join Date: Nov 2017 Real Name: Jesus Location: Texas Watch: 116234 Posts: 8,721	Cool thread! I'm going to be checking out some of the "Previous VERSUS" threads. I'm here to learn Many thanks !

3 April 2018, 12:27 PM	#16
pc109 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: NY Watch: BLNR Posts: 119	Can we get Versus photos comparing the side profiles which show off the unique top hat crystal of the 1680? This reason, along with those mentioned above, is why I chose the 1680 over any 16800.

7 April 2018, 01:54 PM	#17
blowfish89 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Location: Canada Watch: 16800 Matte Posts: 398	Well I made my choice with the matte dial 16800, it’s my one watch. The 1680s look fabulous but some 16800s have deeper patina which I prefer (I don’t know why this happens as 1680s are older). 16800s are also thinner and okay to swim with without much worry. The top hat acrylic has its own charm though :)

11 April 2018, 03:52 AM	#19
Beckster "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2017 Location: Singapore Watch: 16710 BLRO Posts: 836	Wow. No comparison for me. 1680 all the way! __________________ Rolex Only Please

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)