ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 October 2015, 06:58 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Miami
Posts: 19
|
Sea Dweller 1665 Case
Hi Guys, I would like to know what do you thinks of this case
My main concern is that all the 1665 that I have seen online have the case rubber seal in the case and not in the case back Thanks in advance |
26 October 2015, 02:56 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Miami
Posts: 19
|
According to the serial number, this watch dates to 1970
Things that I have noticed on other Sea Dwellers (1665) from late 60's til around 1977: - They have the whole serial or at least the last 3 digits stamped in the case back - Some have the year of production stamped in the case back - Most of them have the year and the whole serial (Or the last 3 digits) stamped in the case back Any help would be much appreciated |
26 October 2015, 03:06 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: US
Watch: Gilt
Posts: 1,592
|
Case back is newer than the case. I don't like the shape of the case, position of lug holes in relation to the lug/ chamfer.... What are you trying to accomplish with this case?
|
26 October 2015, 03:11 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 252
|
As above, case back is newer than case.
Need better photos. |
26 October 2015, 04:09 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Miami
Posts: 19
|
I bought this case on eBay as "Genuine Rolex" (According to the seller) for a project with genuine parts that I have
The thing is that all the Sea Dwellers 1665 that I saw, have the rubber seal gap en the case and not in the case back like the one I posted on the pictures |
26 October 2015, 05:51 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,091
|
I don't like this at all to be honest.
|
26 October 2015, 07:35 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: michael
Location: Florida
Watch: explorer II cream
Posts: 1,661
|
Hopefully you did not get from the guy in Italy who sells the fake cases & case backs.
|
26 October 2015, 08:42 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Miami
Posts: 19
|
I got it from a seller in California with 100% (516) positives reviews
|
26 October 2015, 08:49 AM | #9 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,355
|
I don't like the case and I don't like these "projects"
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
26 October 2015, 10:04 AM | #10 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 343
|
I'd suggest a return to seller for refund.
|
26 October 2015, 01:14 PM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
|
Hard to tell from the pictures provided, but the overall shape of the case looks incorrect. When something looks incorrect it typically is.
|
26 October 2015, 02:59 PM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Planet
Posts: 256
|
the obvious give away is the way those lugs curve.
|
26 October 2015, 09:21 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Nathaniel
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,991
|
I'd be curious to see a real shot of the engravings......
That said, I would tend to agree, this case does not look good.
__________________
sumnersdr on Instagram |
27 October 2015, 08:54 AM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,792
|
The HEV doesn't look right either. Compare it to others, including my former DRSD, and you'll see what I mean. (Also, is that a top-hat crystal on it? Makes me suspicious.)
|
27 October 2015, 09:11 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: South Wales
Watch: 1971 DJ 1603
Posts: 74
|
I am seriously no expert here but to my eye, the lug hole on the left is lower than the one on the right
|
27 October 2015, 10:05 AM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 2,030
|
|
28 October 2015, 05:18 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Miami
Posts: 19
|
More pictures
Here are some pictures of the engravings:
|
28 October 2015, 05:25 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Miami
Posts: 19
|
These are a couple of pictures of the Helium Escape Valve side of my 1665. This one wasn't a project.
I bought it and sent it to Rolex in Dallas for service |
28 October 2015, 05:35 AM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Justin
Location: Jupiter, FL
Watch: 1530,1665,1680
Posts: 2,054
|
|
28 October 2015, 06:13 AM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sweden
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,826
|
Everything you have shown so far hints of the case being counterfeit.
|
28 October 2015, 06:32 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Miami
Posts: 19
|
I already packed it and I'll be shipping it out tomorrow for a refund which the seller agreed
The seller told me that he/she has paperwork from "A very important jewelry store in Miami" saying it's genuine |
28 October 2015, 07:29 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: JC
Location: Earth
Watch: 1680 ~ 16610LV
Posts: 811
|
The engravings are incorrect.
Long E and that 3 is laughable... should be a flat top 3 I've seen much better engravings coming out of china check out this thread: http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=430623
__________________
************************ ************************ |
28 October 2015, 07:48 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 2,030
|
The sad part is that this case will just be sold again and again until some uneducated Person accepts it as genuine.
|
28 October 2015, 04:05 PM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Miami
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
Even if I tell them not to do the work on the watch, receiving an Estimate from them makes me believe that everything is correct with the watch |
|
28 October 2015, 06:55 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Jon
Location: West Sussex, UK
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 88
|
Fake case. As mentioned above, long E and 3.
|
28 October 2015, 10:16 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: michael
Location: Florida
Watch: explorer II cream
Posts: 1,661
|
Correct to send back that junk, totally fake. As said the engravings are poor as well as the case design.
|
28 October 2015, 11:24 PM | #27 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: 1966 Rolex 5513
Posts: 3,419
|
...
|
30 October 2015, 12:42 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
|
You should read the thread on how to spot a fake shield Tudor sub in the ref section. It would have helped you here.
Did u pay $3900 for this? |
30 October 2015, 03:46 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 266
|
Big picture: On the one hand it's immensely helpful to see posts of what appear to be fake dials, cases, etc. as it works to educate the eye. [Obviously it's helpful to the OP as they are asking a sincere question: "How does this look?"]. On the other hand, it's depressing to know/feel that, at some point, the faked thing will most likely find a home courtesy of a less suspicious buyer. Someone's always gonna get burned.
Sucks. |
31 October 2015, 07:11 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Miami
Posts: 19
|
The Case is listed again on eBay
The seller received the case today and it's listed again on eBay
http://www.ebay.com/itm/ORIGINAL-ROL...IAAOSw~bFWHTpu |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.