|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 March 2017, 12:54 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 5
|
Vintage discoveries (Pt 2)
In my previous post I forgot to mention that the serial numbers (I checked on a couple of sites) seem to indicate that the cases date from the mid-30s, which is later than I'd have guessed from the movements.
Anyway here is the second example. Roy This post has appeared before the first one, so explanations are to follow... it seems... Last edited by RoyC; 20 March 2017 at 01:01 AM.. Reason: posted out of sequence |
|
|
|
20 March 2017, 06:37 PM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 5
|
So what happened to the first post (which contained all the detail)? It was "awaiting moderation".
|
|
|
|
|
21 March 2017, 06:44 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 5
|
Moderators please delete my credentials from your site. And ask yourselves why.
|
|
|
|
|
21 March 2017, 06:53 AM
|
#4 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: 1966 Rolex 5513
Posts: 3,414
|
Well, this is slightly confusing....
|
|
|
|
|
21 March 2017, 07:41 AM
|
#5 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,789
|
Not sure what all of this means, but .... cool-looking watch! I believe it's an MK2.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
