ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 July 2021, 03:33 AM | #61 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 528
|
Quote:
I assume the different signature is due to mobile vs. office PC. He said he was traveling in the first email. |
|
18 July 2021, 03:34 AM | #62 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,726
|
Quote:
Sorry I’m not an attorney. The issues of who had a contract with whom is all I was opining. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
|
18 July 2021, 03:37 AM | #63 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: In the Present
Posts: 1,018
|
Regardless of who's right or wrong in this episode, the fact is that the OP was treated rather shabbily. Given Sotheby's reputation and history, it would be a small but important concession to forgive some future transaction fee or locate an equivalent watch, or similar gesture. Just my opinion.
|
18 July 2021, 03:39 AM | #64 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Gary
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 11,038
|
I have no legal experience but I know when something stinks and this one stinks to high heaven as my dear old Alabama mom used to say!!!
__________________
|
18 July 2021, 03:46 AM | #65 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Real Name: Goat
Location: Southwest Florida
Watch: 16613
Posts: 4,788
|
How did Rich know you were the guy that was blasting them in the “Forums”? Did you allude to making a post or did he just supernaturally know it was you?
I ask because with this IT error I presume you’re not the only one who didn’t get the watch they thought they won. So him knowing it was you who posted (no specifics) on the forum and he knew and commented. That befuddles me. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
18 July 2021, 03:55 AM | #66 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Daytona C
Posts: 235
|
Quote:
i know i had to manually get all of my email signatures aligned when setting up a new phone yes, agree |
|
18 July 2021, 04:00 AM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Daytona C
Posts: 235
|
to the OP
so the auction lot for this particular watch was supposed to be taken down as it was not available before the auction went live? if so, there would be an easy trail of communication to prove this from communications with the actual seller to in-house communication to take the listing down if this case was to be filed in CA, you could file in limited jurisdiction (up to $25k in damages) with limited discovery and get all the answers you want and potentially get the case to trial don't know how NY's courts are divided but it may be similar |
18 July 2021, 04:07 AM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: usa
Posts: 135
|
My.02:
What does the contract say? When you signed up for the auction you likely agreed to its rules. Read that. It governs. If Sothebys (or seller) has right to withdraw after winning bid, you lose. But, depending on rules, maybe not. Any lawyer you hire would ask, 'what's the contract say?'. Also, contract may provide prevailing party attorneys fees in event of litigation. That can be tour friend. Or enemy. Depending on the righteousness of your cause. |
18 July 2021, 04:11 AM | #69 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,154
|
I would suggest the OP read the auction house electronic contract which he surely accepted before bidding. That would be the binding contract. I would review it for ordinary negligence language. As one of the previous posts indicated, they are a broker and do not hold title to the goods. The very first question in a commercial dispute, what does the contract say?
|
18 July 2021, 04:12 AM | #70 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Nick
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: 1601
Posts: 10,423
|
Update to Sotheby's Reneged on a Winning Rolex Bid: Update
You could hire a lawyer as a matter of principle. But it will cost you. Dearly. With low probability of a good outcome.
You could also bring this to the attention of the media. Both traditional news media and social media if you feel so inclined. It would cost them a lot of money to fix PR. Although not sure it would gain traction unless shared with watch media outlets. The watch world looooooves the drama llama these days |
18 July 2021, 05:43 AM | #71 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,726
|
Since at least 2019, Sotheby’s T&C’s used language that avoids lawsuits.
DISPUTES BETWEEN YOU AND US WILL BE RESOLVED BY BINDING, INDIVIDUAL ARBITRATION (caps are Sotheby’s in the time honored tradition that important provisions be conspicuous in contracts) They also outline in a very long webpage that they aren’t responsible for errors on their digital platform. https://www.sothebys.com/en/terms-conditions Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
18 July 2021, 05:43 AM | #72 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,049
|
There is likely no case here.
Honest listing or advertising errors almost never hold the lister responsible for hurt feelings or some future nebulous "value lost" claims.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
18 July 2021, 05:55 AM | #73 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1,376
|
Can't believe some of the replies I'm reading here. Imagine thinking Sotheby's should pay you $25k? Really worth getting lawyers involved because you didn't end up getting a Rolex half off?
|
18 July 2021, 06:04 AM | #74 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: United States
Watch: me buy Watches
Posts: 3,955
|
Sotheby's made an honest mistake - they are human just like the rest of us.
Just move on already!
__________________
“The display of actual intelligence terrifies much of mankind” Rolex "some" Tudor "some" Damasko "some" Misc Pieces "some" Marathon "some" GS Spring Drive "some" Hamilton "some" Findeisen "some" |
18 July 2021, 06:35 AM | #75 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Merle
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,479
|
|
18 July 2021, 06:35 AM | #76 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Terrapin Station
Watch: 3 + 4
Posts: 369
|
I've bought and sold through Sothebys in the past, and having had an instance where (in my case) the buyer of one of my consigned lots reneged on their purchase.
these things happen unfortunately - but you likely don't have a case. |
18 July 2021, 08:34 AM | #77 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,254
|
Time to move on
|
18 July 2021, 09:18 AM | #78 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: ing the Detectives
Posts: 1,885
|
sorry this happened, but like many other posters have said, you're not likely to get the outcome you want.
Similar will have happened before at Sotherby's and you can bet that their T&C take account of, and indemnify them against, such occurrences. You or an army of lawyers can write letters till your hands fall off, but far bigger scandals haven't really dented Sotherby's rep, so a $10K watch dispute isn't going to move their needle. No doubt you were excited at getting the watch at 1/2 of your estimated "market"value- but they would simply argue that your bid, as it won, was the market value. Sometimes things just don't go the way you want- shrug, take the refund and move on. Your anger and energy will just be wasted.
__________________
Eagels may soar, but weasels are seldom sucked into jet engines... |
18 July 2021, 10:11 AM | #79 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 2,133
|
|
18 July 2021, 12:32 PM | #80 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Real Name: Jackson
Location: USA
Watch: Sub, GMT, Daytona
Posts: 2,212
|
I would never do business with Southbys after hearing this, like someone said earlier pawnshop with white gloves! Hire an attorney they owe you a watch!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
18 July 2021, 12:39 PM | #81 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,616
|
I am sorry for your troubles.
If Sotheby’s does not have in their possession the watch to send you, then what can you gain from it? Legal action? I am sure this is not the first time that Sotheby’s has reneged on a deal and they know their legal rights. I agree with other posters, get your money back, perhaps some expenses, and move on. |
18 July 2021, 12:40 PM | #82 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,616
|
Quote:
|
|
18 July 2021, 05:58 PM | #83 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,649
|
To me it is not so much the money it is the principle. I really think what they are saying is total bull sh"". Then tell you so kindly there legal team is basically ready. They screwed up and should at least try to do something to make you happy..
|
18 July 2021, 10:47 PM | #84 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: HOME!
Posts: 1,175
|
I don't see the issue.
They made a mistake, they explained their mistake, they apologised and made sure you weren't out of pocket. What's the problem? You're asking for something which is unreasonable so you aren't going to get it. |
18 July 2021, 11:36 PM | #85 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Florida
Watch: AK EXP II SeaQ
Posts: 217
|
"All orders are subject to our acceptance, and we will not be obligated to fulfill any order unless and until we accept it."
This is from their retail terms of sale. From my point of view the OP is entitled some type of compensation. Sotheby did accept the order by evidence of the invoice and accepting payment. The retail agreement also list reasons why an order might not be accepted such as out of stock, no longer available, etc. The decision to not accept an order is refrerenced as taking place PRIOR to confirmation. Good luck to OP. Last edited by Max7857; 18 July 2021 at 11:38 PM.. Reason: spelling error |
18 July 2021, 11:49 PM | #86 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 160
|
I don’t believe that the mistake here warrants 25k. I also don’t believe simply offering a refund makes this mistake, which is all on Sotheby’s, makes this right. I would have assumed that they would offer some type on compensation. Hardly the luxury/high end image that buyers and sellers pay for.
|
19 July 2021, 12:22 AM | #87 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,510
|
Quote:
That is the one piece of ground he seems to have. Like you, I hope it somehow works out. He’s given options that will make him whole. Options I don’t see them taking, since they have gone radio silence on him. If I was going through all of this, even if the watch would show up tomorrow, I would hate it every time I wore it. No watch is worth this amount of trouble. I know the OP’s motivation is principal based at this point, which is why I wish him the best of luck. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
19 July 2021, 12:26 AM | #88 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: CT
Posts: 3,912
|
Keep us posted, OP
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
19 July 2021, 01:05 AM | #89 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 3,764
|
Quote:
There is a lot of good advice to OP on this post. It sounds as if the auction occurred in New York State. It hasn’t been pointed out whether the contract calls for a choice of law of the state of New York (I.e. that’s the law the arbitrator or court will follow), and I have no idea what the law is there. We also don’t seem to be privy to the contract with the original owner, so unless we know what actually happened, and what the law says, the outcome between OP and Sothebys will be hard to predict or guess. I imagine if a lawsuit is ultimately brought (or demand for arbitration made) the original owner will be brought in own way or another, and then the true story of “what happened” will come to light. I also imagine the contract provides for scenarios where the seller can properly pull an item pre-sale. I would also guess (or hope) that the law lays out what happens if a stolen item is sold at auction. Was the watch erroneously given to Sotheby’s (seller somehow mistakenly gave Sotheby’s the wrong watch to sell)? Was the watch stolen and the “true” owner saw it online and told Sotheby’s and provided a police report, so Sotheby’s unwittingly sold a stolen watch? Was the watch supposed to come with a reserve that in actuality wasn’t met, and Sotheby’s IT team erroneously didn’t input the reserve into the system? True “seller’s remorse”? These are just some scenarios that come to my mind. I’m sure my fellow WIS here can think of others. I’ve never bought or sold anything at any auction house (just buy from eBay, never sold), know nothing of the contract with seller, and don’t know NY law. I also don’t work in that industry. The broader question is what to do about it. Generally, settlement and compromise are good things. Abraham Lincoln, who was a lawyer before becoming President, himself urged people to settle and not litigate. While it is a nice watch, it’s not a rare vintage watch, or one owned by anyone famous etc. No doubt the watch specialists at Sotheby’s can source something similar. There are certainly many options, as some have suggested here, on how to make it right. We all have our own threshold of when something is “worth” the fight, and when it’s not. Since the OP is asking for advice, I’m in the “try to work it out” camp, especially given that Sotheby’s expressed a willingness to source another equivalent watch, and is in a position to do so. Keep us posted! |
|
19 July 2021, 11:37 AM | #90 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Brad
Location: Colorado
Watch: 16613
Posts: 1,255
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.