ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
9 July 2020, 09:50 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 102
|
If readings on a timegrapher looks good, is there any reason for a "routine service"?
My Milgauss 116400 was last serviced about 6 years ago. According to "the book," I should be bringing it in for a routine service. But, I wear it about 20% of the time, and when it's not on my wrist, it's sitting in a box and I let it wind down (I have a 8 or nine watch rotation).
Out of curiosity, I had it put on a timegrapher today and it read +2 s/d, 297° amplitude, .1 ms beat error. So pretty much dead on. (After manually winding it fully.) With readings like that, is there any reason to bring it in for its routine service? My thinking right now is no, but everything I know comes from watching YouTube.
__________________
Bell & Ross 123; LeCoultre Master Mariner; NOMOS Metro Datum Gangreserve; Omega 145.022-69, 2234.50.00; Rolex 116500-0002; Sinn 104, 856, U1; Grand Seiko SBGN003. |
9 July 2020, 09:59 AM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,044
|
There are two schools of thought on servicing.
One, if it isn't broken, no need to do anything. Two, machines wear out and seals degrade, so periodic maintenance ensures that it will be at it's best. Pick one school and enjoy your time piece.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
9 July 2020, 10:07 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 4,504
|
Quote:
For watches i buy for myself, I’m in the second school. Vintage...that’s another story. I might service vintage so i can wear it in water. But something modern that i bought new, I’m not servicing it at 6 years. IMO, there is no reason for it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
9 July 2020, 03:54 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sweden
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,826
|
I would have it pressure tested too, to check the seals.
|
9 July 2020, 07:01 PM | #5 | |
TechXpert
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: London
Posts: 2,238
|
Quote:
You want to test it in at least five (ideally six) positions. That gives you a better overview but it's still not the whole picture. We also have to test the watch after 24 hours running and there are minimums that it needs to be above. Then there's an automatic winding and power reserve test. |
|
10 July 2020, 06:50 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 133
|
Always service vintage, parts are getting more and more difficult to source. So make sure parts do not wear much more due to dried out oil or grease.
Modern watch leave it till it breaks. Parts ate no issue. Only concern is waterproof. I have seen watches which after a heavy rain trip on the bicycle (yes, this is Holland) who got flooded. So, if possible, get a service every 5 years where they will replace all seals including the glass gasket and tested. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.