The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 January 2020, 12:08 PM   #1
watchspike
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 96
When does a watch become vintage?

As per the title of the thread, just wondering when do people class a watch as vintage? I've heard 25 years is the magic number which puts my 16700 firmly in the classic vintage territory.

I'm looking to get a Kermit sometime this year hopefully but wasn't sure if discussion about them should be on here or the vintage thread? Earliest examples are coming up to being 17 years old. If only I had the foresight to save up and buy one back then.
watchspike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 12:33 PM   #2
Dr.Stu
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dr.Stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: New York City
Posts: 530
Technically, the correct usage of "vintage" should be used with a year (and for wine), e.g., "this wine is vintage 2011", but "my car (or something else) is vintage 1999" is OK now, too.

Informally, if it's too old to be considered modern, but not old enough to be considered antique, it's "vintage". I think the time varies with each item/area/person, but for watches, I think of "vintage" as being over 30ish years old.
Dr.Stu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 01:24 PM   #3
037
2024 Pledge Member
 
037's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,171
In Rolex collector parlance, vintage is typically anything with an acrylic crystal or older. I suspect that's because a 16700, for example, didn't change over its production cycle and it becomes confusing to call a 1988 16700 vintage and a 1998 16700 classic.

I'd put the 16760 GMT in vintage territory myself since its entire production run ended over 30 years ago. I see the 16700 as a classic.

It's not a hard and fast rule but one interpretation.
037 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 02:19 PM   #4
ryanboude
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Real Name: Ryan
Location: Minneapolis
Watch: 1990 16710 Coke
Posts: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by 037 View Post
In Rolex collector parlance, vintage is typically anything with an acrylic crystal or older. I suspect that's because a 16700, for example, didn't change over its production cycle and it becomes confusing to call a 1988 16700 vintage and a 1998 16700 classic.

I'd put the 16760 GMT in vintage territory myself since its entire production run ended over 30 years ago. I see the 16700 as a classic.

It's not a hard and fast rule but one interpretation.


Really nice thought process. This makes a lot of sense and is easy to distinguish.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ryanboude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 02:45 PM   #5
Dr. Robert
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Dr. Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 61,292
Four digit.....vintage
Five digit......neo-vintage
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Dr. Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 04:15 PM   #6
007timer
"TRF" Member
 
007timer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: US
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 1,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Robert View Post
Four digit.....vintage
Five digit......neo-vintage


I tend to agree with this classification.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
007timer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 08:15 PM   #7
mttb
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 48
ADs SA commented on my DJ I bought ten yrs ago as vintage, so there’s that


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mttb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2020, 01:00 AM   #9
stmoore
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: US
Watch: Gilt
Posts: 1,592
When it leaves the steering wheel photos and your watch and your degree threads in the modern forum and joins the is this a good investment thread here
stmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2020, 01:04 AM   #10
Kingface66
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kingface66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: 1966 Rolex 5513
Posts: 3,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by stmoore View Post
When it leaves the steering wheel photos and your watch and your degree threads in the modern forum and joins the is this a good investment thread here
Are those clowns STILL posting “your watch with your degree” pics over there??
Kingface66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2020, 01:31 AM   #11
TurboTim14
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Illinois
Posts: 267
I think everyone has their own opinion on it and there is no universal standard. What I consider vintage is a watch with plastic crystal or 4 digit ref. So I would say pre 1990.
TurboTim14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2020, 02:05 AM   #12
athom
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 688
That is a question no one can answer, so many people asked and there is just no solution...For me vintage watches are" no white gold surroundings" and acrylic !
athom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2020, 04:26 AM   #13
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,049
Most of these people are no-good liars.

There is no definition of vintage, as it pertains to watches. We may opine to our hearts content.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2020, 12:19 PM   #15
vipergts
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: PA
Posts: 243
for me discontinued model and and white markers with no gold like athom said. i personally consider the 16800 vintage but i know a lot of people consider it modern.
vipergts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2020, 12:33 PM   #16
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
Let me combine two threads: When is vintage a good investment. lol
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2020, 01:29 PM   #17
Gmt21
"TRF" Member
 
Gmt21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: Frank
Location: Earth
Watch: Rolex 1665
Posts: 295
Quote:
Originally Posted by stmoore View Post
When it leaves the steering wheel photos and your watch and your degree threads in the modern forum and joins the is this a good investment thread here
This makes no sense at all.
Gmt21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2020, 01:31 PM   #18
Gmt21
"TRF" Member
 
Gmt21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: Frank
Location: Earth
Watch: Rolex 1665
Posts: 295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingface66 View Post
Are those clowns STILL posting “your watch with your degree” pics over there??
When you resort to name calling on a watch forum what does that say about YOU?
Gmt21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2020, 01:35 PM   #19
stmoore
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: US
Watch: Gilt
Posts: 1,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gmt21 View Post
This makes no sense at all.
Just think some. It might come to you.
stmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2020, 02:25 PM   #20
Gmt21
"TRF" Member
 
Gmt21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: Frank
Location: Earth
Watch: Rolex 1665
Posts: 295
Quote:
Originally Posted by stmoore View Post
Just think some. It might come to you.
Nope. If you care to clarify your points of wisdom go ahead.
Gmt21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2020, 02:49 PM   #21
Kingface66
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kingface66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: 1966 Rolex 5513
Posts: 3,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gmt21 View Post
When you resort to name calling on a watch forum what does that say about YOU?
My sincere apologies. I didn’t consider that “clowns” might offend someone’s sensibilities.
And by “someone” I mean those who don’t recognize the utter absurdity of a post dedicated to showing-off their shiny new Rolex next their precious university diploma. What the two have to do with each other is anyone’s guess
Kingface66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2020, 08:01 PM   #22
rad87gn
"TRF" Member
 
rad87gn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chad
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Watch: Rolex, PAM, Omega
Posts: 1,607
When a 5 series is 50 years old it still won't be considered vintage to most here. lol.
__________________
Rolex P-Series SS GMT II Black, Rolex Y-Series Sea-Dweller, Rolex F-Series TT Blue Sub, Rolex F-Series Sub LV, Rolex D-Series Ladies SS/WG DJ for wife, Panerai K-Series PAM 112, Omega Speedmaster Pro 3570.50, Omega Seamaster 300M Chrono 2594.52
rad87gn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2020, 09:50 PM   #23
mailman
TRF Moderator & DATE-JUST41 2024 Patron
 
mailman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,363
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Robert View Post
Four digit.....vintage
Five digit......neo-vintage
I consider a 16750 with a matte dial vintage
__________________
JJ
mailman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2020, 10:58 PM   #24
athom
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 688
Quote:
Originally Posted by mailman View Post
I consider a 16750 with a matte dial vintage

same same

Quote:
Originally Posted by vipergts View Post
for me discontinued model and and white markers with no gold like athom said. i personally consider the 16800 vintage but i know a lot of people consider it modern.
athom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2020, 10:59 PM   #25
athom
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 688
Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus49 View Post
Let me combine two threads: When is vintage a good investment. lol
athom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2020, 05:33 AM   #26
Burr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 56


I think it’s tough because it’s different for everyone depending on when you got into the watch market and what was modern for you at that time. That being said, I generally agree with the 4 digit reference vs 5 digit reference that was called out earlier in this thread.
Burr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2020, 10:21 AM   #27
BamaHammer
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: South Carolina
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 146
Vintage in jeans are bell bottoms, so you know. Thread closed... mic drop
BamaHammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2020, 10:52 AM   #28
tmfawzy
"TRF" Member
 
tmfawzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Tunku Mahmood
Location: Malaysia
Watch: 16600
Posts: 23
I reckon anything older than 25 years could be considered vintage, there is no hard and fast rule.
tmfawzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2020, 11:13 AM   #29
037
2024 Pledge Member
 
037's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by mailman View Post
I consider a 16750 with a matte dial vintage
As do I.
037 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2020, 11:32 PM   #30
OliverD
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 68
Matte 16750's, 16800 and late 5513's are the difficult ones because they have only one of the two characteristics that most people think define vintage (plexi and matte dial).
OliverD is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.