ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 March 2018, 04:16 AM | #31 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 263
|
I tried a 682 and was sadly disappointed in it. I had high hopes too...
I felt it looked way too small for what i expect in a sub. Could also be that i owned and loved a 305 for many years. Not sure....but it wasn't for me. :(
__________________
Current Stable: PAM 64, 87, 170, 82, 1216, 968, 508 Gone but not forgotten: PAM 233, PAM 1389, PAM 690, PAM 654, PAM 176, PAM 000, PAM 312, PAM 305, PAM 422, Rolex DSSD, Rolex TT Sub Bluesy |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.