The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 March 2018, 12:01 AM   #1
garyfromleeds
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Gary
Location: leeds
Watch: Deepsea D Blue
Posts: 454
Icon20 Pepsi trashed the blro !!!!!!!!!!!!

Im totally gobsmacked ! the new Pepsi is 10/10 totally superb and long over due to be honest ! but here come the negative and sorry if its not what you want to here but the facts are this !

Rolex have stuffed all the BLRO owners and took them for fools by selling them a premium priced watch and selling almost the same looking watch for a quarter of the price swop the bracelet from a normal ceramic gmt and hey bingo you have a BLRO in all steel !

total joke they did that with the white gold sky dweller owners also not long ago !
garyfromleeds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:05 AM   #2
lecorsaire
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: NYC
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 1,541
No one was taking for a fool unless their BLRO came engraved with Steelinox instead of 750. The Sky-Dweller situation is worse. It was marketed as a PM watch and all of a sudden not only is it available in SS but all of the PM exclusive Roman and Arabic dials are gone.
__________________
Rolex 116710 BLNR
Rolex Day Date 118238 Champagne/Batons
lecorsaire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:07 AM   #3
Jacobson
"TRF" Member
 
Jacobson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA, UK, UAE
Posts: 668
Boy am I glad I sold my BLRO last year
__________________
ROLEX: 16570 - 16610LV - 116610LN - 116610LV - 16710 - 116710BLNR - 126710BLRO - 116622 Rhodium - 116520 Black - 116500LN White - 116500LN Black - 228206 Ice
AP: 15450ST White - 15202ST Blue - 26331ST -- PP: 5711/1A Blue - 5056P-001 -- BP: 5008 1130 71S -- JLC: 3908420 -- Tudor: M79470-0001
Jacobson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:08 AM   #4
garyfromleeds
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Gary
Location: leeds
Watch: Deepsea D Blue
Posts: 454
Quote:
Originally Posted by lecorsaire View Post
No one was taking for a fool unless their BLRO came engraved with Steelinox instead of 750. The Sky-Dweller situation is worse. It was marketed as a PM watch and all of a sudden not only is it available in SS but all of the PM exclusive Roman and Arabic dials are gone.
they should have made the coke , but they went for the easier route using the bezels from the blro , exactly the same bezel
garyfromleeds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:09 AM   #5
diracpoint
2024 Pledge Member
 
diracpoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,366
Quote:
Originally Posted by lecorsaire View Post
No one was taking for a fool unless their BLRO came engraved with Steelinox instead of 750. The Sky-Dweller situation is worse. It was marketed as a PM watch and all of a sudden not only is it available in SS but all of the PM exclusive Roman and Arabic dials are gone.
If the numeral dials are gone, as an owner I'll be very very happy,
diracpoint is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:11 AM   #6
cht
2024 Pledge Member
 
cht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: San antonio, TX
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,138
Hopefully now the 16710 market prices will settle down a little....

cht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:11 AM   #7
codecow
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Louis
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: PP 5131R
Posts: 4,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by garyfromleeds View Post
they should have made the coke , but they went for the easier route using the bezels from the blro , exactly the same bezel
I am a super big GMT fan and was very curious about the BLRO until I tried it on. To me it didn't feel special enough to warrant the extra money over the BLNR I already had; especially since I have a 16710 with both Coke and Pepsi bezels.

My 718 in YG with green dial I do feel is special enough to warrant the extra spend, but I'm not a WG guy at all. I don't own a single WG piece.
codecow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:13 AM   #8
tomchicago
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
Rollie did indeed do a number on the orig WG BLRO owners.
tomchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:15 AM   #9
spuds
"TRF" Member
 
spuds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Dan
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: West Ham! COYI!!
Posts: 7,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by garyfromleeds View Post
Im totally gobsmacked ! the new Pepsi is 10/10 totally superb and long over due to be honest ! but here come the negative and sorry if its not what you want to here but the facts are this !

Rolex have stuffed all the BLRO owners and took them for fools by selling them a premium priced watch and selling almost the same looking watch for a quarter of the price swop the bracelet from a normal ceramic gmt and hey bingo you have a BLRO in all steel !

total joke they did that with the white gold sky dweller owners also not long ago !
As a BLRO owner I hate to admit that I agree, but I do.

As an avid collector of Rolex watches this may well have me defecting to AP and even Omega.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacobson View Post
Boy am I glad I sold my BLRO last year
And again, to be honest I wish I had....
__________________
Onwards & Upwards Rodders...... Onwards & Upwards.

Life is not about how fast you can run or how high you can climb...........
It's about how well you can bounce!!



TRF HALL OF FAME JANUARY 2010
spuds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:17 AM   #10
TimeToWatch
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
I don't recall a contract Rolex made with existing BLRO owners to keep that bezel exclusive to their watch. With that being said, I understand your frustration!
TimeToWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:18 AM   #11
wulin
"TRF" Member
 
wulin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: California
Watch: PP,AP,Rolex,IWC
Posts: 578
Quote:
Originally Posted by spuds View Post
As a BLRO owner I hate to admit that I agree, but I do.

As an avid collector of Rolex watches this may well have me defecting to AP and even Omega.





And again, to be honest I wish I had....


I feel for ya!
wulin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:19 AM   #12
johnnyjazz
"TRF" Member
 
johnnyjazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: britain
Posts: 712
You can,t buy the white gold blro with black face now, if you have it good, keep it, it is now officially very difficult to obtain.
johnnyjazz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:19 AM   #13
affalterbach
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: USA
Watch: Seiko SUN065P1
Posts: 359
I love my BLRO and think the new SS on Jubilee is fantastic and plan on getting one. They're very different.
affalterbach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:21 AM   #14
prozac51
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Singapore
Posts: 131
Quote:
Originally Posted by garyfromleeds View Post
Im totally gobsmacked ! the new Pepsi is 10/10 totally superb and long over due to be honest ! but here come the negative and sorry if its not what you want to here but the facts are this !

Rolex have stuffed all the BLRO owners and took them for fools by selling them a premium priced watch and selling almost the same looking watch for a quarter of the price swop the bracelet from a normal ceramic gmt and hey bingo you have a BLRO in all steel !

total joke they did that with the white gold sky dweller owners also not long ago !
Might want to check the new lug dimensions before commenting on the bracelet swap. If you noticed no new GMT came with the SS oyster. I'm sure Rolex did think things through to maintain some exclusivity to existing WG BLRO owners.

Sent from my HTC_2Q4D100 using Tapatalk
prozac51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:22 AM   #15
rmlovett1
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
rmlovett1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 22,509
I must admit...I revamped my lineup recently, going away from bigger lugs,(YES, IN ANTICIPATION OF THE VERY MOVES ROLEX HAS MADE) and any WG Rolex. I’m a happy camper
rmlovett1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:22 AM   #16
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 24,603
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacobson View Post
Boy am I glad I sold my BLRO last year

Good move based on today release! Still love around for WG BLRO but prices will lower for sure


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 2230.50.00
Zenith 02.470.405
Henry Archer Eclipse

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:22 AM   #17
Jim Smyth
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Jim Smyth
Location: Florida
Watch: DD
Posts: 1,842
I have the WG version and could care less that theres a Stainless model out there. I am happy guys that cant or wont afford the gold version now have another choice thats palatable. The cost of any gold Rolex IMO is ridiculous but unfortunately necessary if you want in.

I bought mine used (someone else already took the big hit) for a specific reason to me and dont care if the price goes up or down since I have no intention of getting rid of it. I am happy and dont feel Rolex snubbed me at all.

YMMV
Jim Smyth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:26 AM   #18
Watch-Ed
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: EU
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by prozac51 View Post
Might want to check the new lug dimensions before commenting on the bracelet swap. If you noticed no new GMT came with the SS oyster. I'm sure Rolex did think things through to maintain some exclusivity to existing WG BLRO owners.

Sent from my HTC_2Q4D100 using Tapatalk
Are the lugs dimensions different? They say they redesigned the case and lugs but looking at it I cant see why a regular oyster bracelet would not fit.

Would be nice if I could switch around my BLNR's oyster and the Pepsi's Jubilee when it arrives.
Watch-Ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:26 AM   #19
Devildog
"TRF" Member
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,638
Quote:
Originally Posted by garyfromleeds View Post
Im totally gobsmacked ! the new Pepsi is 10/10 totally superb and long over due to be honest ! but here come the negative and sorry if its not what you want to here but the facts are this !

Rolex have stuffed all the BLRO owners and took them for fools by selling them a premium priced watch and selling almost the same looking watch for a quarter of the price swop the bracelet from a normal ceramic gmt and hey bingo you have a BLRO in all steel !

total joke they did that with the white gold sky dweller owners also not long ago !
You are assuming that the Oyster bracelet will fit the SS BLRO case (which remains to be seen)

And if the SS SkyD had been available with the same dials as the PM versions (as opposed to the other way around) I would agree.

PM feels so different on the wrist. I suspect those WG BLRO or WG Sky D owners who are most upset by the introduction of a SS BLRO are those that want other people to know that their watch is 2.5x more expensive.

A WG BLRO remains a grail for me. The fact I could pick up one in SS for half the price (assuming I would have to get it from the gray market) is irrelevant. Its the WG I want. The difference on the wrist is significant
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR

Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green.
Devildog is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:28 AM   #20
Vaxe
"TRF" Member
 
Vaxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 2,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacobson View Post
Boy am I glad I sold my BLRO last year
. For sure, I feel bad for those who bought them last month after the rumors of it being discontinued.
Vaxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:29 AM   #21
c41006
"TRF" Member
 
c41006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Joshua
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Pelagos
Posts: 7,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by fskywalker View Post
Good move based on today release! Still love around for WG BLRO but prices will lower for sure
I'm thinking the WG BLRO might take a hit in the short term but will eventually stabilize and start climbing back up
c41006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:30 AM   #22
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by spuds View Post
As a BLRO owner I hate to admit that I agree, but I do.

As an avid collector of Rolex watches this may well have me defecting to AP and even Omega.





And again, to be honest I wish I had....
Totally understand. I was not a fan of what they did to Sky Dweller owners and now this.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:30 AM   #23
904VT
"TRF" Member
 
904VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 6,976
Good luck getting your hands on the new BLRO without first buying something equivalent from your AD to that very same old BLRO or at a large premium from a trusted seller
904VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:31 AM   #24
rossi46
"TRF" Member
 
rossi46's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: shopping
Posts: 1,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by cht View Post
Hopefully now the 16710 market prices will settle down a little....
You must be new here.
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob
rossi46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:33 AM   #25
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by fskywalker View Post
Good move based on today release! Still love around for WG BLRO but prices will lower for sure


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
WG BLRO prices will plummet! It will be the most affordable and likely least desirable PM piece going forward. The new model just put the nail in the coffin.
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:35 AM   #26
Armyguy03
"TRF" Member
 
Armyguy03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DM[V]
Watch: 16710 | 16600
Posts: 3,546
Quote:
Originally Posted by rossi46 View Post
You must be new here.
__________________
Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Armyguy03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:35 AM   #27
Watch-Ed
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: EU
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devildog View Post
You are assuming that the Oyster bracelet will fit the SS BLRO case (which remains to be seen)

And if the SS SkyD had been available with the same dials as the PM versions (as opposed to the other way around) I would agree.

PM feels so different on the wrist. I suspect those WG BLRO or WG Sky D owners who are most upset by the introduction of a SS BLRO are those that want other people to know that their watch is 2.5x more expensive.

A WG BLRO remains a grail for me. The fact I could pick up one in SS for half the price (assuming I would have to get it from the gray market) is irrelevant. Its the WG I want. The difference on the wrist is significant
I agree on PM feeling different on the wrist and all but the original Pepsi was in steel and regardless of the price point I think that makes the SS BLRO special in its on right (more true to the original). Also I dont think people that buy watches in white gold want others to know their watch is 2.5x more expensive otherwise they would go for yellow or rose.

Now, I am really curious to know if a regular oyster would fit this "new" GMT case.
Watch-Ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:38 AM   #28
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devildog View Post
You are assuming that the Oyster bracelet will fit the SS BLRO case (which remains to be seen)
I really doubt it will as that is the main signifier now for the difference between black WG and SS, and WG owners can take comfort from the fact that the "lesser" bracelet was forced on the SS as they didn't disco the WG after all.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:39 AM   #29
kilyung
2024 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,870
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devildog View Post
I suspect those WG BLRO or WG Sky D owners who are most upset by the introduction of a SS BLRO are those that want other people to know that their watch is 2.5x more expensive.
As a WG Pepsi and WG SkD owner, I disagree. If I want people to know that I’m wearing an expensive watch, there are better watch choices for that purpose. What irks me is the hit my watches will take in value. Of course I buy watches because I like them and not as an investment. And I still like them. However, many of us here are flippers or will trade watches as tastes changes. So now our trade value has diminished, impacting future trades.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2018, 12:42 AM   #30
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,696
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
As a WG Pepsi and WG SkD owner, I disagree. If I want people to know that I’m wearing an expensive watch, there are better watch choices for that purpose. What upsets me is the hit my watches will take in value. Of course I buy watches because I like them and not as an investment. And I still like them. However, many of us here are flippers or will trade watches as tastes changes. So now our trade value has diminished, impacting future trades.
Agree with you Mike. In the short term you may see value impacted. It remains to be seen longer term though.

I think the BLRO will always comand a good buck as it is a very limited run in the grand scheme if things.



Sent from my SM-G935W8 using Tapatalk
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.