GMT 1675 Radial/Mini Dial

[Lamone]

Here's a 1675 GMT 3.9mil radial/mini dial (hour markers are closer to the center, which gives the illusion of a smaller dial).
I wanted to share this fine example, as we don't see them very often.

[tomvox1]

...almost like the dial manufacturer mistakenly used a gilt dial outline to create it. The lume placement is similarly away from the edges/toward the center.
Very cool & enjoy,
T.

P.S. 5 million case serial #?

[Lamone]

Originally Posted by tomvox1

...almost like the dial manufacturer mistakenly used a gilt dial outline to create it. The lume placement is similarly away from the edges/toward the center.
Very cool & enjoy,
T.

P.S. 5 million case serial #?

Hey Tom,
It's a 3.9 million serial and actually a tritium dial.
The dial manufacturer is "Beyeler" which could explain the difference with the dials "Singer" manufactured.

[tomvox1]

Originally Posted by Lamone

Hey Tom,
It's a 3.9 million serial and actually a tritium dial.

...I am referring to Luminous plots in general. If I am referring to "Luminova", I would write "Lumi". Isn't Rolex vernacular great?
Enjoy that GMT,
T.

[Speed]

Quite the specimen!!!

[R1@160@alltimes]

Never seen such a dial before. Thanks for pointing it out

[mike]

I love that version and one you don't see that often. Nice!

[RLX-lvr]

That's right Mike, pretty rare as it's not seen very much.

I was lucky to have handled one, and have it on my wrist in September,
and let me tell you it was mesmerizing.

Fell in love instantly.

[Lol-x]

It is interesting the way Rolex changed the dial on the 1675. There are indeed quite a few variations.

The smaller inset markers are very interesting. I wish there was some official explanation for that. I doubt that the dial makers would have done this off their own bat. I suspect that Rolex issued instructions regarding the positioning and the size of the markers on the dial. I guess we will never know.

[greekbum]

Not Often Seen and Very Nice