The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 21 November 2010, 02:45 AM   #1
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
IWC Pilot Chrono Rose Gold Review.

Iwc has always been impressing me. But honestly, the models I wanted, such as their perpetual calendar Portuguese are way above my budget, and even moreso with their tourbillon series.

Their pilot watches are great, but none really strike me as much. The big pilot is awesome, but my small wrist just can't pull it off.

so the other day I visited my AD and found the pilot chrono rose gold. It stole all of my attention that day. And nothing else is of any interest. I saw one of the members who got one not so long ago,but never actually saw one in person.. Until that day.



Its undeniably stunning. It had such a combination that I couldn't resist. The black dial, the rose gold case, and the dark brown strap.. Along with the red sub-seconds hand, it was just all good.



So I bought it. Got a great discount and actually the msrp itself wasn't all that bad for a gold watch.

For around 11k, brand new, I think its bang for your buck. The gold case is heavy and nicely built. Brushed sides and polished surface adds the glint and gleam of the watch. The crystal is domed and coated, legibility is not an issue, and I kinda like the domed crystal.

However, the minute hand and the chrono seconds hand is slightly bent downwards towards the dial towards the tip. I'm not sure if this is sight play due to the curved cystal, but having looked at it through several angles, I'm positive that it is slightly bent downwards. This is probably to avoid the minute and seconds chrono hand to touch the crystal. But I'm not so sure.

I'm also unaware of the movement, but I highly suspect that it is a heavily modified version of ETA. Moreover, you also get a date and day feature along with the chrono function. What more could you ask for? Hehe.. Any more it will be a perpetual or annual calendar and then it would cost a lot more..

You might also notice that IWC's rosegold is not as pink as Rolex's. There's a red gold option (but not available for this model) that is as link as Rolex's everose.



The watch sits really well on the wrist. At times it does feel slightly top heavy, but nothing to complain about. The size is also particularly well thoughtl it doesn't look awkward at all.

The chrono pushers does protrude a little more than I wouldve liked, but that's just minor aesthetics complain from me.

Speaking of which, the chrono start pusher does feel abit stiff when activated. Not sure if this is the case with all models. But feels that way on mine.

The markers, numbers, hands, all are very legible and easy to read at a glancel however the limes are only applied on the 3,6,9,12 and hour and minute hands. But I guess that's all you need when trying to spot in the dark. However, the Lume doesn't glow as bright as I expected, and it doesn't last too long as well.



The watch is supplied with a rose gold tang buckle. Looks simple and plain to me. However it wished it wouldve been a double deployant clasp instead, will keep my straps in better condition after longer periods of time..

Nothing else interesting to talk about the buckle. I do like that they made it brushed, doesn't scratch easily.



The back part of the watch is pretty dull and boring.. For a gold watch that is over 10k, I wouldve expecTed to have an exhibition caseback or at least a decorated caseback. But then again some of you might say that I won't see it when I'm wearing it, which is true, but I just wish iwc would put more effort into it.

In summary, I love it. Its a casual and dress watch at the same time. I actually just wore it with my suit tonight.

They have several versions of this chrono watch, in steel, with bracelet, in ceramics and in a larger ceramics dopplechrono..

Oh one more thing.. I think the box sucks. Iwc should pay more attention to that.


Thanks for reading guys.
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2010, 05:01 AM   #2
Michael M.
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
Cool review and pictures! The IWC 3717 is a timeless piece, my dad has the stainless steel version. BTW: Congrats!
Michael M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2010, 10:27 AM   #3
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
Thanks Michael, I would agree that it is indeed a timeless piece..
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2010, 10:59 AM   #4
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
Norman, I actually have the very same model in Rose Gold as well. Great review.

I got the deployment clasp which cost a bit more. I think it is pretty oustanding myself. Congrats and I hope you enjoy yours as much as I enjoy mine.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IWC Pilot Chrono Resized.jpg (52.7 KB, 583 views)
File Type: jpg IWC Deployment Clasp Resize 1.jpg (61.4 KB, 577 views)
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2010, 01:00 PM   #5
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
Hi Dan, yes I know you have one.. It was actually yours that inspired me to get mine hahaha..

The single deployant wouldn't work for me, I wish they made a double deployant model.

Extra pic..

__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2010, 06:37 PM   #6
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
Ah, yes wrist size I imagine. Either way though it's still a great watch. Once again you did an excellent job on your review.

Thank you sir, and enjoy your IWC Pilot Chronograph. That and Rose Gold is such a great combination.
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2010, 07:32 PM   #7
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
Thanks Dan! I am definitely enjoying it very very much..
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2010, 06:13 PM   #8
Ezza8
"TRF" Member
 
Ezza8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Australia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 165
Great review of a top watch..here's mine!

Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0306.jpg (105.2 KB, 554 views)
Ezza8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2010, 08:46 PM   #9
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
Cool, we have another member in our group. Excellent!!!
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2011, 10:57 AM   #10
anonymousmoose
"TRF" Member
 
anonymousmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 601
An impressing piece indeed. Although a bit late, please accept congratulations from me too.

As a 3717 owner, I can relate to your enthusiasm. Although the Gold version was above budget for me, I am extremely satisfied with my steel version.



As for the hands appearing bent towards the dial, I believe it is the crystal giving it that appearance on all 3717s.

The calibre 7750 is modified to IWC specification, thus making the modification unique to the brand. Less expensive brands using the 7750 do not have the IWC modification. ETA delivers the modified movements to IWC Schaffhausen. ETA manufactures the modification to the high specifications IWC specifies. I believe, I may be wrong, IWC came up with the actual modification.

The stiff chronograph pushers is not unique to your watch, it is the standard for the 3717.

/posted via mobile device\
__________________
anonymousmoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2011, 11:27 AM   #11
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
Quote:
Originally Posted by anonymousmoose View Post
An impressing piece indeed. Although a bit late, please accept congratulations from me too.

As a 3717 owner, I can relate to your enthusiasm. Although the Gold version was above budget for me, I am extremely satisfied with my steel version.
Excellent we have another member to add to the club.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2011, 11:46 AM   #12
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
Awesome review.

Can I ask - does this IWC modified 7750 "wobble"?
esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2011, 06:28 PM   #13
anonymousmoose
"TRF" Member
 
anonymousmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 601
Quote:
Originally Posted by esm View Post
Awesome review.

Can I ask - does this IWC modified 7750 "wobble"?
Sure does.


/posted via mobile device\
__________________
anonymousmoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.