ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

beshannon · 21 June 2019, 01:13 AM

“Like the submersible, OMEGA’s Ultra Deep was built to last: designed for multiple dives and not just a single shot at the world record”

Cool engineering!

https://www.omegawatches.com/planet-...ldsdeepestdive

solesman · 21 June 2019, 01:34 AM

A PO minus the awful HE valve, crown guards and minus a date makes a great looking watch! Beaten Rolex by 20 metres!

Quote:

Originally Posted by beshannon

“Like the submersible, OMEGA’s Ultra Deep was built to last: designed for multiple dives and not just a single shot at the world record”

Cool engineering!

https://www.omegawatches.com/planet-...ldsdeepestdive

beshannon · 21 June 2019, 05:02 AM

Agreed

stockae92 · 21 June 2019, 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by solesman

A PO minus the awful HE valve, crown guards and minus a date makes a great looking watch!

Put that in a human wearable 42mm case with 600m WR, I will buy one :)

Stevec14 · 21 June 2019, 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stockae92

Put that in a human wearable 42mm case with 600m WR, I will buy one :)

42mm is good, but it’s very thick. There are some Instagram shots today and it looks thicker than a deep sea!

stockae92 · 21 June 2019, 06:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stevec14

42mm is good, but it’s very thick. There are some Instagram shots today and it looks thicker than a deep sea!

This is where the "human wearable" part kicks in ...

Stevec14 · 21 June 2019, 06:45 AM

I failed to grasp that - sorry.

Interesting though. A deep sea equiv.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

antbkny · 21 June 2019, 06:48 AM

Impressive

beshannon · 21 June 2019, 08:35 AM

Yes it is a feat of engineering.

What I like is the look that could be made for the average watch enthusiast, minus the thickness. I like the blue and the strap

0-60 · 28 June 2019, 08:00 PM

Thats actually really gorgeous. Tough for me now to decide between the planet ocean and the planet ocean ultra deep.

1William · 28 June 2019, 09:12 PM

I like the watch and would buy it in a regular production piece from 42-45 mm and lose the thickness and some depth ability that is not needed for the average wearer.

Boo-E · 2 July 2019, 03:39 PM

Meh

Travelller · 12 December 2022, 04:13 AM

I got to try out both* variants of Omega's Ultra Deep the other day - very impressive examples of heavy-duty tool watches

But at the end of the day, a bit more duty** than I really need. My two Omega SM300s, a 41mm SM300MC & a 42mm 165.0324, do the job just fine

*the Ti version has a more unique appeal

but the NATO adds unneeded height, aesthetically speaking whereas the steel sits quite naturally on the wrist

**... & heavy, especially the steel case on the steel bracelet

21 June 2019, 01:13 AM	#1
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,895	The seamaster planet ocean ultra deep professional “Like the submersible, OMEGA’s Ultra Deep was built to last: designed for multiple dives and not just a single shot at the world record” Cool engineering! https://www.omegawatches.com/planet-...ldsdeepestdive __________________ Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Glashutte Senator Exellence, Rolex 116710 GMT Master II BLNR, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent

21 June 2019, 05:02 AM	#3
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,895	Agreed __________________ Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Glashutte Senator Exellence, Rolex 116710 GMT Master II BLNR, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent

21 June 2019, 08:35 AM	#9
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,895	Yes it is a feat of engineering. What I like is the look that could be made for the average watch enthusiast, minus the thickness. I like the blue and the strap __________________ Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Glashutte Senator Exellence, Rolex 116710 GMT Master II BLNR, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent

12 December 2022, 04:13 AM	#13
Travelller 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: VIE Watch: my sig. ;) Posts: 3,064	I got to try out both* variants of Omega's Ultra Deep the other day - very impressive examples of heavy-duty tool watches But at the end of the day, a bit more duty** than I really need. My two Omega SM300s, a 41mm SM300MC & a 42mm 165.0324, do the job just fine the Ti version has a more unique appeal but the NATO adds unneeded height, aesthetically speaking whereas the steel sits quite naturally on the wrist* ... & heavy, especially the steel case on the steel bracelet __________________ Traveller** - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321 Panerai 111 217 233 Rolex 16600 126600 Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033 Tudor 5B GMT Zénith A386ME Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora

21 June 2019, 06:45 AM	#7
Stevec14 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2016 Real Name: Steve Location: U.K. Watch: 321, Snoopy 3 Posts: 4,400	I failed to grasp that - sorry. Interesting though. A deep sea equiv. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

21 June 2019, 06:48 AM	#8
antbkny "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Real Name: Anthony Location: Brooklyn, NY Watch: Dblue Posts: 6,723	Impressive

28 June 2019, 08:00 PM	#10
0-60 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2018 Location: Bahrain Posts: 197	Thats actually really gorgeous. Tough for me now to decide between the planet ocean and the planet ocean ultra deep.

28 June 2019, 09:12 PM	#11
1William 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex/Others Posts: 44,652	I like the watch and would buy it in a regular production piece from 42-45 mm and lose the thickness and some depth ability that is not needed for the average wearer.

2 July 2019, 03:39 PM	#12
Boo-E "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2019 Real Name: Mike Location: San Francisco Watch: 126660 Posts: 46	Meh

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)