ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 January 2021, 10:30 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 173
|
Breaking Permanent Link in Royal Oak?
So after deciding to keep this 14790, now I have to accept or alter this bracelet... the old clasp makes it pretty difficult for someone with smaller wrists, which is odd to me, if they were creating these mid-sized watches for people who turned away from the 39mm jumbo...
1st attached picture shows the bracelet position when the watch face is perfectly set on the top of the wrist. notice the bulge and protrusion due to the awkward position of the clasp. 2nd attached picture shows how i'd like the bracelet to sit, but that would mean the watch face sliding way over in the 12 o'clock direction. In order to do this, and assuming I plan on keeping it forever and never reselling it (i guess never say never...), my thought was to break a permanent link, that would make the 6 o'clock side of the bracelet shorter and just add one of the extra links i have to the 12 o'clock side. 3rd and 4th picture shows the permanent link that would need to be broken. i don't have a caliper, but that link and the one with a visible screw under it look to be the same width. assuming they are the same - my boutique says they'd need to send it into Clearwater to do but that they might ask to re-service the whole watch/movement to touch the bracelet. Anyone try to do something similar and get that response? I prefer not to service, because I don't want them touching the original crown. I also don't want to pay $1K+ on servicing for a piece that tells good time and was just serviced by the dealer i bought from... Clearwater doesn't open till Tuesday because of MLK day, so figured I'd ask the question here until I can get a hold of them. Thanks in advance. |
17 January 2021, 12:29 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Real Name: Goh
Location: Singapore
Watch: 116622
Posts: 438
|
Why not you centre your clasp so that it is on the middle of ur wrist? Will just have to move a few removable links to from one side to the other.
If not you can take out the bracelet and rotate it 180 degrees instead. Sure it may take awhile to get used to but at least you dont do any permanent damage to your bracelet
__________________
Watches owned: Rolex GMT II 126710BLRO | Patek Philippe 5205G | Audemars Piguet 15500ST | Rolex DJ 16233 | Tudor BBBBB 79250BB | Ball DM1036A |
17 January 2021, 12:31 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: IN
Posts: 1,979
|
send it to me I'll fix it......
steve |
17 January 2021, 01:15 PM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 173
|
Quote:
not to complicate things more, but i can't flip the bracelet either because the owner before me must've worn it super tight and the 4 screws connecting the bracelet to the case are all bent and can't be removed (boutique tried). Clearwater will have to drill through the hole and to replace the 4 screws. i don't care as much about the bracelet being "original", since i plan on keeping it, and the value is really in the head of the watch and dial anyway. need feedback as to whether anyone asked clearwater to break a permanent link without having to fully service the watch. thanx |
|
17 January 2021, 09:39 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Stratosphere
Posts: 1,990
|
Hey! Few questions for you, what size are your wrists? I have pretty small wrists, and never had a huge issue with the 14790 (own it in steel and gold).
The later versions of the 14790 allowed you to remove 1 extra link on the 6 clock vs the earlier version, where you would still have one link you could not remove. I suppose they addressed the issue later on, and so on later variants the clasp centers better closer to the middle of the wrist on smaller wrists. I do think you should try removing 1 link from the 12 clock and putting it in the 6 clock. Currently the clasp sits way too close to the 12 clock. By doing this the clasp should fall closer to the 6 clock, and not 12 clock. You always want to keep less at the 6 clock as you know, but currently it is extremely unbalanced. My wrists are extremely small, and the clasp has always centered better than in the photos you've posted. I'd like to see photos after you move a link to the 6 clock. No need to break a permanent link btw, the 14790 was designed for puny wrists like ours ;) |
18 January 2021, 02:14 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 173
|
Quote:
I'm at around a 6.25" wrist, but as we know, 6.25 looks different depending on width/height etc. https://www.watchbrotherslondon.com/...udemars-piguet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrwR...ature=youtu.be |
|
18 January 2021, 03:50 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/PP/ALS
Posts: 5,922
|
From your original picture, it seems like you have less links on 6 o'clock side and too many links on 12 o'clock side. You need to move some links from 12 o'clock side to 6 o'clock side.
You should have the clasp (when close) close to the center of the wrist, so both sides should have the same number of the links or 1 less link on 6 o'clock side. I have 6.6" wrist, on my 14790SA, I have 9 links on each side (not counting 2 links at the clasp).
__________________
Rolex: 116621, 126333, 126711CHNR, 114060, 116500LN White, 126660 JC, 126710BLNR, 126710BLRO, 116610LV, 126610LN, 126610LV, 116508 YG Green Dial, 124300 Turquoise, 126719BLRO Meteorite dial, 228235 Olive dial ,126755SARU, 116505 RG Black dial, 326934 Blue Sky D. Audemars Piguet: 15451ST Blue, 15500OR w/Bracelet, 14790SA, 14790BA, 26022BC(Salmon) Patek Philippe: 5524R, 5712G, ALS: Time Zone 136.032, Cartier: WGSA0030, WSSA0061, YG Oct. 2965, Breguet: 7137BA, MontBlanc: 109996", Seiko: SRPA21, |
18 January 2021, 07:07 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 173
|
i promise you guys, there's too many links at 6 and not enough at 12. here's how the bracelet looks if i move one from 12 to 6 - even more imbalanced and the bulge is even worse. the clasp under the bracelet shifts way too far to 12, and is even more uncomfortable. i really don't mind breaking a link, but i guess i'll wait till tuesday to ask clearwater if no one knows whether or not they'll do that without servicing the movement. also took a picture of my DJ36 to show the ideal balance with a similar clasp.
|
18 January 2021, 07:52 AM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/PP/ALS
Posts: 5,922
|
From your latest first picture, you have 8 links on 6 0'clock and 9 links on 12 o'clock which is correct. The clasp seems to be at the center of the wrist but I don't understand why the link next to the clasp pop up like that.
I think you can go back to the shop that you bought or any watch repair shop to let them adjust your bracelet, it should be very easy for them.
__________________
Rolex: 116621, 126333, 126711CHNR, 114060, 116500LN White, 126660 JC, 126710BLNR, 126710BLRO, 116610LV, 126610LN, 126610LV, 116508 YG Green Dial, 124300 Turquoise, 126719BLRO Meteorite dial, 228235 Olive dial ,126755SARU, 116505 RG Black dial, 326934 Blue Sky D. Audemars Piguet: 15451ST Blue, 15500OR w/Bracelet, 14790SA, 14790BA, 26022BC(Salmon) Patek Philippe: 5524R, 5712G, ALS: Time Zone 136.032, Cartier: WGSA0030, WSSA0061, YG Oct. 2965, Breguet: 7137BA, MontBlanc: 109996", Seiko: SRPA21, |
18 January 2021, 09:52 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 3,599
|
I have nothing to contribute, other than to say that this is the most confusing thread I've seen on TRF
|
18 January 2021, 09:52 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 173
|
Quote:
|
|
19 January 2021, 11:42 PM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Stockholm
Watch: 15707CE
Posts: 1,986
|
Quote:
The last picture you show where the clasp sits close to horisontal when holding is for me the most comfortable way to wear a royal oak. But fair, enough not all wrists are the same. You don't happen to have a picture of a Rolex or other common sport watch that is sized to you liking?
__________________
State of the union: 5066A,15400ST,15707CE,116610LN,26470OR and a few other… |
|
20 January 2021, 01:00 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 173
|
Quote:
i included the rolex photo in my last post. also, i called clearwater, they can break the permanent link and refinish the welding accordingly, could cost a few hundred they said but ultimately, they always want me to send it in to get the estimate etc etc. the good news, is that they said they can do it without having to service the movement, so that's what i'll probably do after wearing it for birthday celebrations. Thanks all |
|
20 January 2021, 03:47 AM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Watch: AP, Rolex, Omega
Posts: 1,335
|
I maybe wrong, but seems to me that due to the fact that the rigid clasp is pretty much the width of your wrist you may be fighting a losing battle. As the blades are straighter, as it were, than the curvature of your wrist they will always protrude a bit at the sides, meaning the links will acutely pull up at the sides - or at least on one side.
|
23 January 2021, 03:01 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 190
|
Is it possible to roll the blades a bit to get better curvature?
Did the boutique try some heat on the screws to open? |
23 January 2021, 04:52 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 173
|
sorry, not sure what you mean by rolling the blades out. are you saying, blend the clasp? i dont know if i trust myself playing with a 30 year old bracelet...
the boutique did not try heating anything but that would've been a good thought. i'll have the dealer who sold it to me pay for that repair though since it's probably not something that was expected when i purchased it. i dropped it off at the boutique today. clearwater confirmed they can break a link without servicing the movement. with any luck, maybe i'll be ready in time for my birthday in 2 weeks :/ |
24 January 2021, 05:46 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 190
|
Happy it is in Clearwater's hands. The clasp metal looked thin enough to give an easy curvature using a pipe as a model. But the route went is the best.
|
24 January 2021, 12:55 PM | #18 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Family first
Posts: 652
|
Quote:
|
|
25 January 2021, 11:43 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 173
|
yeh, that was my first thought but like i mentioned before, all 4 screws connecting the bracelet to the case were all bent and the boutique couldn't remove them to flip it... but even then, i feel like it would've bothered me thaat i was wearing the bracelet upside down lol
|
8 December 2021, 05:33 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: HK
Posts: 2
|
14790st clasp issue!
Hey there- I’m having a similar issue with my clasp bulging out and would be curious to hear if your breaking the links worked on solving that issue?
|
8 December 2021, 05:35 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: HK
Posts: 2
|
I’m also considering asking the AD to sell me one of the later clasps that have the ap logo as that clasp seems like its a bit more curved and might fit better. But not sure if they have stock or if the clasp will actually fit my bracelet…
|
9 December 2021, 10:00 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 379
|
Just break the links on the six o"clock side. Quite obvious the problem.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.