The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 March 2024, 02:30 AM   #31
WILLIWALKER
"TRF" Member
 
WILLIWALKER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Gerardus twins
Location: EU
Watch: Rolex Tudor Omega
Posts: 799
Quote:
Originally Posted by THC View Post
The ship radioed a MayDay call a few minutes prior to the collision, which saved many lives

A simple breakdown seems highly improbable to me. Since we have said that everything is hackable
All my prayers for the families of the victims
__________________
Il est doux le sommeil du travailleur
WILLIWALKER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2024, 03:32 AM   #32
Krash
2024 Pledge Member
 
Krash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 7,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by samson66 View Post
Just heard an update on the local radio. Six still missing. Apparently the ship got a mayday call out just before the collision. This gave the local officials just enough time to close the bridge so no traffic was on the bridge at the time of the collapse. The people who went in the water were all part of construction crews that were working on the bridge overnight. Two have been rescued. The bridge sits over a 50' shipping channel. This could have been a lot worse if that mayday call wasn't received. Some really good news in all of this bad news.

Thank goodness for that mayday call.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Krash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2024, 01:54 PM   #33
pickettt
"TRF" Member
 
pickettt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: California
Watch: Shiny One
Posts: 5,367
Who is the CEO of the shipping company?
pickettt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2024, 06:45 PM   #34
joli160
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by pickettt View Post
Pilot. Tugboat. Any members here Coast Guard?
What a tragedy.
No coast guard but active master mariner here.
From what I understood there were two Pilots onboard.
It is uncommon to have one or more tugs accompanying a vessel the whole stretch from berth to sea. A vessel this size needs speed to be able to steer rendering the use of tugs obsolete.

Too early to draw conclusions about the root cause.
Might be human error or a technical failure which unfortunately can happen any time.
No different on vessels than in aviation and space craft industry.
Lots of procedures and systems in place to avoid such incidents on which we are audited and frequently inspected by i.e. coast guard, port state control, flag state and classification societies.

From what I can see there are no physical barriers in the water protecting the pillars. That is an engineering oversight in the design phase of the bridge imho.

Feeling for the victims families and for the captain who is by law ultimately responsible.
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2024, 07:00 PM   #35
Speedbird-1
"TRF" Member
 
Speedbird-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Steve.
Location: UK
Posts: 6,099
Horrible accident, for all concerned. I can't imagine the absolute horror involved in being on that bridge, and being suddenly plunged into the river amongst all that heavy steel and concrete. Awful!



I was wondering if the condition of the outer hull, might be an indication of the condition of the engine and the rest of the ships equipment.
Speedbird-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2024, 08:18 PM   #36
NAVY
"TRF" Member
 
NAVY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: 114060
Posts: 309
Quote:
Originally Posted by joli160 View Post
What a tragedy.
No coast guard but active master mariner here.
From what I understood there were two Pilots onboard.
It is uncommon to have one or more tugs accompanying a vessel the whole stretch from berth to sea. A vessel this size needs speed to be able to steer rendering the use of tugs obsolete.

Too early to draw conclusions about the root cause.
Might be human error or a technical failure which unfortunately can happen any time.
No different on vessels than in aviation and space craft industry.
Lots of procedures and systems in place to avoid such incidents on which we are audited and frequently inspected by i.e. coast guard, port state control, flag state and classification societies.

From what I can see there are no physical barriers in the water protecting the pillars. That is an engineering oversight in the design phase of the bridge imho.

Feeling for the victims families and for the captain who is by law ultimately responsible.
There's a port nearby, in Halifax, NS that ships of similar size frequent. There are also two large bridges spanning Halifax harbour. The bridge piers have rock formation barriers surrounding each pier for protection. Also, when a ship approaches harbour entrance , it embarks a pilot and it is mandatory that ships of this size employ tugs to accompany vessel during its harbour transit. Typically two tugs are tethered astern and one at the bow. During such a steering gear failure or power failure, these tugs working together, could possibly avert such a tragedy. The two tugs astern can slow/stop the the ship in distress and the tug up forward can steer the bow away from an obstacle.

Unfortunately accidents at sea, like on land and in the air occur. Ships are getting larger and on the water, huge ships are harder to maneuver in the tight confines of a harbour and due to their immense size, almost impossible to slow down/stop during a power failure/steering gear failure.
NAVY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2024, 10:34 PM   #37
77T
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by pickettt View Post
Who is the CEO of the shipping company?

It's a complicated answer if you mean "where does the buck stop?"

The Dali is owned by Grace Ocean Private, a Singapore-based company. But for this voyage it was chartered by Maersk at the time of the collision. To make it more murky, it is managed by Synergy Marine, but its parent company is Unity Group Holdings International based in Hong Kong.

See what I mean?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2024, 10:41 PM   #38
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by 77T View Post
It's a complicated answer if you mean "where does the buck stop?"

The Dali is owned by Grace Ocean Private, a Singapore-based company. But for this voyage it was chartered by Maersk at the time of the collision. To make it more murky, it is managed by Synergy Marine, but its parent company is Unity Group Holdings International based in Hong Kong.

See what I mean?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Indeed. There may be a lot of finger pointing.
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2024, 10:50 PM   #39
77T
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,822
Key Bridge Struck and Collapsed Baltimore

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
Indeed. There may be a lot of finger pointing.
Agree Brian. And that was just the ship ownership liability.
Ever since the dual incidents of 1980,

public policymakers could have invested in protection. So there is that angle, too, the US accounted for most of the bridge collapses caused by a ship or barge collisions since 1960.

These authors presented great work to explain all the factors for risk management of the inevitable - and it was back in 2018...that is where I found the photo while reading background on how often this occurs.
https://conference-service.com/pianc...l_paper_46.pdf


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2024, 11:10 PM   #40
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by 77T View Post
Agree Brian. And that was just the ship ownership liability.
Ever since the dual incidents of 1980,

public policymakers could have invested in protection. So there is that angle, too, the US accounted for most of the bridge collapses caused by a ship or barge collisions since 1960.

These authors presented great work to explain all the factors for risk management of the inevitable - and it was back in 2018...that is where I found the photo while reading background on how often this occurs.
https://conference-service.com/pianc...l_paper_46.pdf


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
What a fantastic read, thank you

I’d encourage others who are following this with interest to read your link.

Almost eerie feeling … but this section stood out to me.

2.4 Geometric Probability (PG)
The geometric probability (PG) is the conditional probability that a vessel will hit a pier given that it has lost control (is aberrant) in the vicinity of the bridge. The method of computing PG is based on a normal distribution curve, with the mean located at the centerline of assumed vessel transit path and a standard deviation equal to the length overall (LOA) of the design vessel under consideration. Note that bridge elements located beyond 3 standard deviations from the centerline of vessel transit path do not influence the geometric probability of collision. The area under the normal distribution curve bounded by the limits of the centerline of vessel contacting either side of the pier is equal to the geometric probability of collision (Figure 10). As can be interpreted from this figure, increasing the distance between piers can significantly reduce the value of PG since the collision zone would be contained within the tail area of the normal distribution curve.
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2024, 11:12 PM   #41
samson66
2024 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 12,949
Check this out if you get a chance. Police audio of them closing traffic to the bridge just before the collapse. Chilling to listen to. Shows how quickly they acted and how short the warning time was. They synced it up to the video of the impact.

samson66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2024, 03:45 AM   #42
pickettt
"TRF" Member
 
pickettt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: California
Watch: Shiny One
Posts: 5,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
Indeed. There may be a lot of finger pointing.
Too bad Angela Chao happened to die last month. Maybe she would’ve sorted it all out.
pickettt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.