Which is more flashy? TT or Solid Gold?

[Andad]

Originally Posted by Bigblu10

Isn't "vulgar" a bit strong?

Not when describing David....

[ThatDudeJeff]

Originally Posted by DavidUK

TT is flashy.

YG is plain vulgar.

Couldn't agree more

[ThatDudeJeff]

Solid YG or RG definitely has a more flashy presence on the wrist.

[Spoonage]

Bling factor least to greatest

SS -> SS w/PCL -> WG -> PL -> TT -> RG -> YG... And then there are the diamonds...

[lord91]

Originally Posted by s14roller

It's crazy, but I tried to sell the TT 116613LB sunburst for the all gold model and price not being a factor, I thought the TT looked better. Go figure.

Because it does, thanks to the contrast it offers between steel, yg and royal blue . The full yg worked better on the 5 digit than the actual model. Back to the topic of the thread, yg stands out on a tt, but next to a yg is overpowered in terms of bling.

[regnant]

As an ex full yellow gold owner and also owned two tone watches I must say the former definitely crushes the latter when it comes to being flashy

[CPRWATCH]

Personally TT all day long for me , flashy or not . And If Solid Gold is your thing then more power to you .Its more how you wear the watch that counts
And there is definitely not enough pictures on this thread so here goes .

[DavidUK]

Originally Posted by AK797

Watch your language, you have a habit of making extreme, provocative statements and that isn't how this forum works.

Rubbish. Nothing extreme or provocative. Just my opinion. Yours differs, get over it.

I take it you have a YG Rolex?

[DavidUK]

Originally Posted by directioneng

Not when describing David....

Isn't a personal attack against another member against the rules?

What grounds do you have for calling me "vulgar"?

[GolfPunk]

Originally Posted by DavidUK

TT is flashy.

YG is plain vulgar.

Unnecessary and offensive to those with beautiful yellow gold watches.

[watchwatcher]

Hard to say...they say a picture's worth a 1000 words, so here's a shot of both.

You be the judge.

[DavidUK]

Originally Posted by GolfPunk

Unnecessary and offensive to those with beautiful yellow gold watches.

Some could regard their beautiful TT or YG watch being called "flashy" in the same way... unnecessary and offensive.




From: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/flashy

If "vulgar" is offensive to some, so must "flashy" be by association.
In which case mods should consider closing the thread for breaching "rules" as the OP and others have used "extreme, provocative statements and that isn't how this forum works."

[tyler1980]

Originally Posted by DavidUK

Some could regard their beautiful TT or YG watch being called "flashy" in the same way... unnecessary and offensive.




From: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/flashy

If "vulgar" is offensive to some, so must "flashy" be by association.
In which case mods should consider closing the thread for breaching "rules" as the OP and others have used "extreme, provocative statements and that isn't how this forum works."

language is a funny thing. Context matters as much as the word choice. If someone said i offended them or their choice in watches, i would apologize and try to do better, it works.

[HogwldFLTR]

Originally Posted by DavidUK

TT is flashy.

YG is plain vulgar.

Absurd!!!

[Headshrinker]

I guess I love being vulgar!

[DavidUK]

Originally Posted by Headshrinker

I guess I love being vulgar!

And I love being flashy!

[DavidUK]

Originally Posted by directioneng

Not when describing David....

You have offended me. Please apologise.

[DavidUK]

Originally Posted by tyler1980

language is a funny thing. Context matters as much as the word choice. If someone said i offended them or their choice in watches, i would apologize and try to do better, it works.

Nobody has said my use of the word vulgar in connection with YG Rolexes has offended them.

[Devildog]

Originally Posted by DavidUK

TT is flashy.

YG is, in my opinion, plain vulgar.

Originally Posted by DavidUK

Rubbish. Nothing extreme or provocative. Just my opinion. Yours differs, get over it.

I take it you have a YG Rolex?

If its your opinion, thats fine in my book, but perhaps it would help to make it clear (as per my edit above)

Just sayin

[MonBK]

Originally Posted by DavidUK

Isn't a personal attack against another member against the rules?

What grounds do you have for calling me "vulgar"?

Show a pic of yourself and let us decide!

[tyler1980]

Originally Posted by MonBK

Show a pic of yourself and let us decide!

[MonBK]

Originally Posted by MonBK

Show a pic of yourself and let us decide!

Here's a pic of me at age 2 with my first DD.

[Tampashooter]

I find my solid far less blingy than the two tone. And i've been down the two tone road multiple times.

[DanielWatson]

Dumbest question ever, i'd have to say steel is.

[watchwatcher]

Originally Posted by DavidUK

Nobody has said my use of the word vulgar in connection with YG Rolexes has offended them.

If I cared about your opinion, I would say you've offended me...but I don't.

I will say, however, the overwhelming majority of posts in response to your statement of YG is "vulgar" has not been favorable to your choice of words.

Perhaps you would be better off by apologizing and trying to be more positive in the future.

[hambone1983]

Originally Posted by DavidUK

Nobody has said my use of the word vulgar in connection with YG Rolexes has offended them.

I personally think its hilarious because it's so over the top.

You are using the word to mean that it is ostentatious, pretentious, ignorant, unrefined, lacking in taste, attention seeking. You can argue that if you like; it's what the word means.

I know you were talking about your perception of the watch, but "vulgar" as it is defined would apply more to the person who wears it rather than to the object.

[hambone1983]

Originally Posted by MonBK

Here's a pic of me at age 2 with my first DD.

I know you can't read at 2, but that watch is on upside down

[MonBK]

Originally Posted by hambone1983

I know you can't read at 2, but that watch is on upside down

I know, I just wanted to be vulgar.

[LAFLARE]

This thread is pretty entertaining. Bump

[Onikage]

More gold = More flashy. TT being more flashy than a full YG golden idol of a timepiece is ridiculous to me, and I expect ADs only say this to shift TT models. I love gold, TT, SS, RG, WG it's all pretty damn tasty to me. btw.