ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

vh_bu98 · 5 July 2007, 12:38 AM

When I got my LV, it was 8 seconds ahead. So off to the RSC it went and now it's a few seconds behind, but within spec.

So the question being is would you rather deal with it being a few seconds ahead or a few seconds behind?

Mennald · 5 July 2007, 12:42 AM

I would rather be a little ahead!

worktolivelife · 5 July 2007, 12:43 AM

+ is preferable [ in fact all mine have been + luckly] find it easier to adjust by just hacking the movement then if and when

steve

Tools · 5 July 2007, 12:48 AM

I prefer to have a +1 to +3 watch for that mental "warm fuzzy"

I recognise that even a -3 or -4, over the course of a year would only be a few minutes, but, in my mind......I would feel the need to hurry since my watch runs slow.

However, in the past decade I will have to say.....I have not checked for that type of accuracy. All 4 of my Rolex, or any of the others for that matter, are set the same way when put on....I set to either the cable TV display or my cell phone, and then forgotten 'til next time.

In recent memory, I have not been late yet due to my watch.

dfn8tly · 5 July 2007, 02:57 AM

Always a little ahead for me.

Chris B · 5 July 2007, 03:32 AM

Definitely always ahead, easier to reset & you're never late for an appointment etc.

roadcarver · 5 July 2007, 04:20 AM

Rather be ahead than be behind - especially applicable for meetings or interviews.

JJ Irani · 5 July 2007, 04:22 AM

+1 would be acceptable to me....no more, no less (unless it's ZERO)!!

mikey · 5 July 2007, 05:00 AM

You had 8 seconds fast and now you 3 seconds slow the RSC really messed with you for coming back for complaint. That aint right.

Olyckan · 5 July 2007, 05:42 AM

Ahead, no doubt.

Arturo · 5 July 2007, 06:05 AM

Ahead

Blue Bull · 5 July 2007, 06:12 AM

Leave it face down,during the night and you may find it,to be spot on.My Sea-Dweller has been face down,for the past three nights and gained 1s over the three days.Before,when left face up it was -2s/day.
The Expl II was -1.7s/day when left face up,now with face down,its at -0.5s/day.

Try face down,for your -3s/day watch,it may just work ..

SPACE-DWELLER · 5 July 2007, 06:18 AM

I will put it graphically:

Rather a

than

5 July 2007, 12:38 AM	#1
vh_bu98 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Vu Location: Dallas area Watch: Platinum YM Posts: 2,646	Ahead or Behind? When I got my LV, it was 8 seconds ahead. So off to the RSC it went and now it's a few seconds behind, but within spec. So the question being is would you rather deal with it being a few seconds ahead or a few seconds behind?

5 July 2007, 12:42 AM	#2
Mennald "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Illinois Watch: Daytona Posts: 319	I would rather be a little ahead! __________________ Mennald 116300, 116333, 116334, 116400V, 116520, 116610LV, 116610LN, 116710, 116718, 218239, PAM 90, 126600

5 July 2007, 12:43 AM	#3
worktolivelife "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: UK Posts: 1,365	+ is preferable [ in fact all mine have been + luckly] find it easier to adjust by just hacking the movement then if and when steve __________________ MEMBER NO.142

5 July 2007, 04:20 AM	#7
roadcarver "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Vernon Location: C-a-n-a-d-a Watch: 16600 Posts: 5,641	Rather be ahead than be behind - especially applicable for meetings or interviews. __________________ I'm just a cook...

5 July 2007, 04:22 AM	#8
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,320	+1 would be acceptable to me....no more, no less (unless it's ZERO)!! __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

5 July 2007, 12:48 AM	#4
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,049	I prefer to have a +1 to +3 watch for that mental "warm fuzzy" I recognise that even a -3 or -4, over the course of a year would only be a few minutes, but, in my mind......I would feel the need to hurry since my watch runs slow. However, in the past decade I will have to say.....I have not checked for that type of accuracy. All 4 of my Rolex, or any of the others for that matter, are set the same way when put on....I set to either the cable TV display or my cell phone, and then forgotten 'til next time. In recent memory, I have not been late yet due to my watch.

5 July 2007, 02:57 AM	#5
dfn8tly Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Richard Location: The Villages, FL Watch: GMT-II Posts: 396	Always a little ahead for me.

5 July 2007, 03:32 AM	#6
Chris B "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Peterborough Posts: 9,623	Definitely always ahead, easier to reset & you're never late for an appointment etc.

5 July 2007, 05:00 AM	#9
mikey "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: USA Watch: Oysterdate 6694 Posts: 2,713	You had 8 seconds fast and now you 3 seconds slow the RSC really messed with you for coming back for complaint. That aint right.

5 July 2007, 05:42 AM	#10
Olyckan Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Stockholm, Sweden Watch: Sub no date! Posts: 69	Ahead, no doubt.

5 July 2007, 06:05 AM	#11
Arturo "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Arturo Location: Pacific Northwest Watch: Black GMT ll Posts: 1,271	Ahead

5 July 2007, 06:12 AM	#12
Blue Bull Banned Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,887	Leave it face down,during the night and you may find it,to be spot on.My Sea-Dweller has been face down,for the past three nights and gained 1s over the three days.Before,when left face up it was -2s/day. The Expl II was -1.7s/day when left face up,now with face down,its at -0.5s/day. Try face down,for your -3s/day watch,it may just work ..

5 July 2007, 06:18 AM	#13
SPACE-DWELLER "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Bo Location: Denmark Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 22,436	I will put it graphically: Rather a than __________________ With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)