ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 March 2019, 08:52 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Vetracer
Location: London
Watch: Daytona 116500LN
Posts: 577
|
Being critical of the Rolex SkyDweller
I’ve not been a fan of the SkyDweller in precious metal or it’s recent stainless steel form. To me the off-centre second timezone hour wheel looks peculiar. The watch also wears big on my 7 inch wrist.
I must give it credit though on the design of the complication; it’s original and quite ingenious. Do you think Rolex will ever amend this movement to relocate the off-centred second timezone hour wheel to satisfy the OCD among us? Wishful thinking... |
25 March 2019, 09:09 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: norcal
Posts: 3,031
|
Here's my 2 cents: Rolex masterfully simulate the extreme high demand of this Sky Dweller by releasing 1-2 pieces to each AD a year, the research and tooling cost is always high...So good luck in getting to get Rolex redesign and retooling for such small quantity production watch.
Seriously, I doubt too many even have seen this SS Sky Dweller watch in real life. |
25 March 2019, 09:26 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,652
|
I think it's a wonderful watch. To be on my radar all it needs is a glidelock clasp.
|
25 March 2019, 10:00 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Bay Area
Watch: Sky-D, Sea-D
Posts: 166
|
There is not a single watch like this, a reason enough to buy if you like the idea. Wrist size is a different matter.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
25 March 2019, 10:02 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 19,406
|
One man's trash is another man's treasure. Personally I treasure it and love the look. It's incredibly easy to use, easy to read, and all bussiness. Of course beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
__________________
__________________ “Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming 'Wow! What a Ride!'” -- Hunter S. Thompson Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory. |
25 March 2019, 10:05 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Real Name: Danny
Location: Mansfield , Texas
Watch: All of them
Posts: 2,380
|
I loved mine but it was just to big on my wrist. I couldn’t pull it off
|
25 March 2019, 10:06 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Yangon
Posts: 183
|
Quote:
Agreed. If it wasn’t for the huge size, it would definitely be number one on my list Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
25 March 2019, 10:49 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Chip
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 6,194
|
My wrist is under 7 inches and I have no problem with the sky.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try. Yoda, Jedi Master CHIP Member # 87 |
25 March 2019, 10:52 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
Its 50 mm lug to lug and 14 mm thick. Not exactly huge even on a 6.5 inch wrist....
__________________
If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4. |
25 March 2019, 11:27 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: SD, CA
Watch: BLNR/LVc/SkyD/ND41
Posts: 2,519
|
I like my SkyD, especially the fact that the second time wheel is off center.
|
25 March 2019, 11:43 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: _
Posts: 1,877
|
Quote:
|
|
25 March 2019, 12:47 PM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,568
|
Its not for me (yet). I say “yet” because Rolex watches have a strange way of growing on me
__________________
♛ 116689 ♛ 116500LN Blk ♛ 116500LN Wht ♛ Sky Dweller 326934-003 ♛ 126710BLNR ♛ 126710BLRO - ♛ 126610LV ♛ 16520 ♛ 16523 ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1A-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Fiddy 127, Bronzo 671, 687, 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Daniel Roth Endurer Chronosprint, Cartier Santos XL - ✿ Tudor Black Bay 58 Bronze M79012M, Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41 |
25 March 2019, 01:57 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Dirty South
Posts: 629
|
I can see how it isn’t for everyone but I love everything about it. My favorite is the WG on bracelet with the Roman numerals. But the SS models are fantastic also.
Part of what I love about it is the below-center GMT sub-dial. My preference would be for it to remain unchanged |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.