The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 31 July 2019, 11:52 AM   #1
seanneok11
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Real Name: Sean
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Ap,rolex, rolex
Posts: 172
Why no love for the explorer 2 42mm

Just curious why there’s no love for that watch. Haven’t seen it in person but hey 42mm watch Ss Rolex makes a whole lot of sense.
seanneok11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 11:54 AM   #2
dmb359
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
dmb359's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Darren
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 637
what do you mean no love?

It's a very popular watch, and there's waiting lists on it at AD's....sounds pretty popular to me.

Just because it's not as hot as a Daytona doesn't mean it isn't popular.
__________________
@dmb359
dmb359 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 02:18 PM   #3
EEpro
2024 Pledge Member
 
EEpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Brad
Location: Purdue
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 9,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmb359 View Post
what do you mean no love?

It's a very popular watch, and there's waiting lists on it at AD's....sounds pretty popular to me.

Just because it's not as hot as a Daytona doesn't mean it isn't popular.
After parting with my deposit I can assure you the past 2 of my estimated 3-4 week wait has just flown by... 1st SS Rolex for me. I have two TT.
EEpro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 12:03 PM   #4
shane.shepherd
"TRF" Member
 
shane.shepherd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 38
I really like the polar explorer 2, but they are simply too big. If they had the sized unchanged like the previous version 40mm, 12mm thick, I would be all over it.
shane.shepherd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 12:06 PM   #5
1665fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,599
I love the exp2. Just haven’t had a chance to buy one...if that watch is too thick then what is the deep sea lol...it doesn’t have much fanfare because it’s easier to acquire...it’s a gmt with stationary bezel
1665fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 12:08 PM   #6
zaydans
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Joe
Location: CONUS
Watch: Rolex 116710
Posts: 994
That model was high up on my list but always gets bumped for something else. In recent years it got displaced by an AK and now a DJ41. Yes it’s a Rolex but not sure I’d love it enough to keep forever. Would hate to get one and then become the first Rolex I ever flip!!
zaydans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 12:09 PM   #7
Seibei
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New Zealand
Watch: 114060
Posts: 2,630
No love? Waddayou mean?
Seibei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 12:09 PM   #8
Justindo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: California
Posts: 2,176
I like the watch but I wish they would have kept it at 40mm.
Justindo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2019, 03:58 AM   #9
lastshotkid
"TRF" Member
 
lastshotkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justindo View Post
I like the watch but I wish they would have kept it at 40mm.


With the updated dial design, yes, 39-40mm would’ve been a homerun!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
lastshotkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2019, 09:41 AM   #10
Mr.Rolex1
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Mike
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 1,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by justindo View Post
i like the watch but i wish they would have kept it at 40mm.
+1
Mr.Rolex1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 12:11 PM   #11
schoolboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
I think the love has been increasing since everything else can’t be had

Or maybe people just realized what a cool watch it is.

I tried one on the other day, and i feel it fits me too big

So hopefully at Basel they bring it down in size and keep the metal bezel!
schoolboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 12:13 PM   #12
KFP55
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Needham, MA
Posts: 173
I freaking love mine
__________________
116710 LN l 16710 Pepsi l 216570 Polar
KFP55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 12:19 PM   #13
rph08
"TRF" Member
 
rph08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: USA
Posts: 992
The orange on the dial is a deal breaker for me. Now the 16570 is a totally different animal. I like that watch a lot. In fact, I've been wearing mine for the last few days.
__________________
Can you name the truck with four wheel drive,
smells like a steak and seats thirty-five...

Canyonero! Canyonero!
rph08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 12:20 PM   #14
nikesupremedunk
"TRF" Member
 
nikesupremedunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Andrew
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,227
It’s not unpopular but it’s also not at the top of the popularity chain either. Id say it’s very underrated and often forgotten, but it’s a fantastic piece. I’d have one in my collection of my wrists were 7”+.
__________________
| 116234 DJ36 | 116610LN SubC | 116520 Daytona | BlackBay 58 Blue |
nikesupremedunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 12:21 PM   #15
stratlanta
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 362
Have it. Love it.
stratlanta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2020, 12:56 AM   #16
frank4242
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 111
I have one and I love it actually.
frank4242 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 12:22 PM   #17
NYCREBROKER
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Steven
Location: Miami Beach
Watch: 214270 &Speedy Pro
Posts: 391
The polar version is on my list. Love it.
NYCREBROKER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 12:23 PM   #18
Fedpete
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: usa
Posts: 745
Way overdue for update.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fedpete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 12:26 PM   #19
maxymax
"TRF" Member
 
maxymax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: CT
Posts: 721
Quote:
Originally Posted by seanneok11 View Post
Just curious why there’s no love for that watch. Haven’t seen it in person but hey 42mm watch Ss Rolex makes a whole lot of sense.
Sorry, this’s just absurd!
maxymax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 12:27 PM   #20
Nikrnic
"TRF" Member
 
Nikrnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,160
It seems it's more loved now then ever. I finally bought mine a year ago and my AD has only had one in stock since. (as of last week) Its 42mm but with its slender lugs and smaller twin lock crown the proportions may surprise you as it did me when I finally tried one on for size.

Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk
Nikrnic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 03:57 PM   #21
Nairn1980
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,258
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikrnic View Post
It seems it's more loved now then ever. I finally bought mine a year ago and my AD has only had one in stock since. (as of last week) Its 42mm but with its slender lugs and smaller twin lock crown the proportions may surprise you as it did me when I finally tried one on for size.

Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk
X2
Nairn1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 12:39 PM   #22
Jarlaxle
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 99
All the 40mm watches are just too small for my frame (6’4”/240) and wrist size (7.5”). The DJ41 is dressier than I want and the DSSD is just way too big for a daily wearer. I get it that its too big for some. Trust me, I wish a Sub or GMT worked for me but they just don’t. For those of us who need a bigger watch, its a welcome addition.

So its either the Explorer 2 or the Sea Dweller. Tried both on and while the SD43 is stunning, its quite a bit heavier and would be a lot of watch to wear every day. The Explorer 2 felt perfect and I do value the GMT functionality. Throw in the fact that the price is well under 1/2 of the SD43 on the open market and I’m sold.

I have more or less settled on the black face but both are great. What has surprised me the most though is how versatile it is. I don’t think I would ever take the SD43 off the bracelet just because it needs the balance but the Explorer 2 is a veritable strap monster. These are all pics I found online, not my watch but you get the point.











Jarlaxle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 12:41 PM   #23
jvb.nc
"TRF" Member
 
jvb.nc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: NC / CA
Watch: 228206meteorite
Posts: 1,333
it’s good.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 2DA56585-841F-41E3-AFC7-C3FC5EE65458.jpeg (272.3 KB, 2628 views)
__________________
116710blnr / 116610lv / 216750 polar / 126600 mk1 / 116500ln / 126710blro / 228206 meteorite / 126719 meteorite / Pelagos 25600 // insta @jvbphotos
jvb.nc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2020, 01:03 AM   #24
Rori
"TRF" Member
 
Rori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Middle East
Watch: Rolex / Tudor
Posts: 3,590
Agree with you on wrist size vs case size. I wish I can convince my eyes to accept the look of the 40mm case on my wrist buy so far I failed.
The SD43 came in the game and when I tried it on I immediately felt the need to have one.
The Explorer 42 is a stunning watch and goes so well with different types of straps that pictures you shows prove the point. Also love the GMT function which I completely missed it there until so lately !



Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarlaxle View Post
All the 40mm watches are just too small for my frame (6’4”/240) and wrist size (7.5”). The DJ41 is dressier than I want and the DSSD is just way too big for a daily wearer. I get it that its too big for some. Trust me, I wish a Sub or GMT worked for me but they just don’t. For those of us who need a bigger watch, its a welcome addition.

So its either the Explorer 2 or the Sea Dweller. Tried both on and while the SD43 is stunning, its quite a bit heavier and would be a lot of watch to wear every day. The Explorer 2 felt perfect and I do value the GMT functionality. Throw in the fact that the price is well under 1/2 of the SD43 on the open market and I’m sold.

I have more or less settled on the black face but both are great. What has surprised me the most though is how versatile it is. I don’t think I would ever take the SD43 off the bracelet just because it needs the balance but the Explorer 2 is a veritable strap monster. These are all pics I found online, not my watch but you get the point.











__________________
Good watches are made to tell time but some brands are obsessed to tell it in the most beautiful way possible.
Rori is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2020, 04:48 PM   #25
SeaDweller50
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Sandy
Location: England.
Watch: 14060M 2 liner
Posts: 3,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rori View Post
Agree with you on wrist size vs case size. I wish I can convince my eyes to accept the look of the 40mm case on my wrist buy so far I failed.
The SD43 came in the game and when I tried it on I immediately felt the need to have one.
The Explorer 42 is a stunning watch and goes so well with different types of straps that pictures you shows prove the point. Also love the GMT function which I completely missed it there until so lately !
Nice pics Rori.
SeaDweller50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 12:55 PM   #26
rcambrid
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 239
Too big...unfortunately
rcambrid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2020, 11:36 AM   #27
carwashchris
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Ohio
Watch: Vintage DD'S
Posts: 830
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcambrid View Post
Too big...unfortunately
There also seems to plenty for sale on the secondary market, 1-2 years old ?
carwashchris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2020, 12:10 PM   #28
brmott
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Tulsa, OK
Watch: Rolex SubC
Posts: 159
Just bought mine last week here on TRF. Love it! I have a 8” wrist and large hands and it is perfect. My Sub was just too small.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg A65C2782-8505-45E5-9845-B7A76F70CE71.jpeg (23.5 KB, 330 views)
brmott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 01:02 PM   #29
swils8610
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
swils8610's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: shannon
Location: usa
Posts: 8,995
Big fan of the polar...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
swils8610 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 01:06 PM   #30
DLRIDES
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
DLRIDES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by seanneok11 View Post
Just curious why there’s no love for that watch. Haven’t seen it in person but hey 42mm watch Ss Rolex makes a whole lot of sense.
It’s now selling above retail, somebody loves it !

__________________
”When citizens learn to vote themselves the treasury, they limit prosperity.”
DLRIDES is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.