ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 February 2020, 12:43 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Colorado
Posts: 408
|
Ocean Swimming with Older Rolex
Headed to Hawaii shortly and will be spending a lot of time swimming in the saltwater.
I was thinking of bringing either my 25 year old Explorer II or my 22 year old Submariner. Both watches are well-worn with dents and dings. I spoke with my local authorized(?) service center who advised me that even with new gaskets, seals, pressure testing etc, he felt it was a risk. He said they would probably be okay, but why risk it? Why not pick up a G-Shock for less than $100? I know saltwater can be tough and I would be upset if I were to damage either watch. I don’t baby my watches (not these two at least) but I’m thinking about picking up the G-Shock and just not worrying. I do have other options. A 2019 Explorer I, but not sure its WR rating. Other contenders- a Hamilton Khaki that is also a year or so old that is rated at 100m. Still, it’s gonna be a lot of time swimming in the ocean... I’m leaning towards the G-Shock. Its funny, I haven’t owned a digital watch since I was a kid. For 80 bucks the Casio is solar powered and synchs to the Atomic Clock. Rated at 200 meters. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
25 February 2020, 12:46 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
|
It is a risk unless you have them perform a reseal. A reseal would involve testing to 300m on your Submariner.
If they seal and test it right before you leave, I fail to see why there would be a problem. Source: am a watchmaker. |
25 February 2020, 01:03 PM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Colorado
Posts: 408
|
Quote:
Thank you! I will inquire. It sure would be nice to have the sub back in the ocean! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
25 February 2020, 01:04 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
|
Ocean Swimming with Older Rolex
Did the place you took it to indicate any corrosion or damage on the seal areas?
|
25 February 2020, 02:07 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Colorado
Posts: 408
|
Quote:
We only spoke on the phone. I plan to stop by tomorrow 2/25 and show him the watches. Perhaps he’ll have more insight when he sees them in person. I will eventually send both to RSC. The submariner sustained damage years ago when I took a high speed spill off my road bike. The bezel came off (crystal and gasket too). It went back together easy enough and has been tight ever since. (The titanium rods connecting my L4 and L5 have held tight as well.) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
25 February 2020, 02:09 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
|
Do not swim in that watch until it is tested.
|
25 February 2020, 02:14 PM | #7 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Valencia, CA
Watch: GMT Master 1675/3
Posts: 2,046
|
All sound advice. Aside from wearing one of those beautiful watches, another option is getting a Seiko diver for about $250-300. Looks great and will perform the heavy lifting on the daily no problemo.
|
25 February 2020, 02:43 PM | #8 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,736
|
The newer to you Expl. I will suffice for any swimming you’ll do. Just have it pressure tested and problem solved.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
25 February 2020, 05:28 PM | #9 |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,477
|
Personally I'd never dive/swim with 20+ year old gaskets, whether it passes the test or not. Especially the air testers that most use are not 100% accurate, old gaskets can definitely pass a test.
Sometimes the gaskets look fine once you open up the watch, and they disintegrate when you want to take them out. Have them replaced before you go for a swim. |
25 February 2020, 09:40 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 139
|
It would be a crying shame not to use the watch and put on some plastic thing. Life is full of risks stop over thinking put on the watch you want and enjoy the entire adventure your going on. Rolex were meant for sea water. Rolex has been saying it for 30 years. " After swimming sea water, rise with fresh water" Get it pressure tested for sure first.
|
25 February 2020, 10:46 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Paris
Posts: 21
|
Also check the clasp. You don't want your expensive watch to end up at the bottom of the ocean.
|
25 February 2020, 10:56 PM | #12 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,713
|
Quote:
I didn’t realize this about air testers. |
|
26 February 2020, 05:32 AM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 19,452
|
Get it tested for sure, and if it is that old, may as well get it serviced to ensure water proofness. JMHO
__________________
__________________ “Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming 'Wow! What a Ride!'” -- Hunter S. Thompson Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory. |
27 February 2020, 01:26 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Colorado
Posts: 408
|
Ocean Swimming with Older Rolex
Thank you all for the great input!
Local service center (not RSC) was still hedging, even with new seals, gaskets etc. He said they’d ‘probably’ be fine. He also said his pressure testing was pass/fail and not 100% reliable. Both watches have some decent bruises and neither have ever been to RSC. I’m thinking it’s time. I’ll eschew the complimentary polish. They look good as they are. My recently acquired Kermit was RSC serviced last March and they assured me it would work to spec. And it’s still under warranty. Not stoked to get that one all beat up though. I wear it often but not ready to turn it into a weekend warrior. Once the 14060 and the 16570 are fully factory serviced they’ll be my regular ocean swimmers! (Not that I do that often.) I’m assuming the 16570 will do okay in the ocean, though not technically a diver. I like traveling with it due to the GMT hand. In the meantime, look what showed up from AMZPrime! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
28 February 2020, 01:35 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,027
|
A sub is a DIVE watch. Just get it pressure tested before you go to make sure the seals are good.
The explorer would be rated to 100m. but again, get it pressure tested. I know people who have snorkeled with old acrylic datejusts...and those were only rated to 50m
__________________
RCN (Canadian) Tudor Milsub database co-manager |
29 February 2020, 10:54 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: LtCol R
Location: Mtns-NM-MT
Watch: 1680Red-551214060M
Posts: 233
|
It is probably due for at least a real pressure test and replacement of all seals and gaskets.
I have a 1680 red Submariner and a 14060M. The 1680 has more bottom time-serious diving than any of my other watches. They are Submariner tool watches-built to take it. The founder of Rolex made his watches for their intended purpose. |
11 March 2020, 10:31 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 77
|
Called an oyster case for a reason, guess it will held up strong even though not pressure tested, just make sure you got the crown screwed tight, good to go!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
11 March 2020, 12:44 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Watch: Seiko's
Posts: 2,563
|
It being a oyster case does not make it water resistant. Only good gaskets do.
|
11 March 2020, 04:20 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Uk
Watch: RolexGMT/Tudor7928
Posts: 2,651
|
Why would you risk it? For the sake of a holiday I’d just leave it at home
|
11 March 2020, 08:27 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,269
|
As long as any watch no mater its age passes its rated depth rating then it will be fine, if its suitable for the activity you will be using it for
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
12 March 2020, 02:05 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Watch: Seiko's
Posts: 2,563
|
|
15 March 2020, 11:24 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: LtCol R
Location: Mtns-NM-MT
Watch: 1680Red-551214060M
Posts: 233
|
After replacement of gaskets, seals and it passes the re-seal pressure depth testing--
place a NATO nylon band on your Submariner for the trip. Virtually nothing on land or sea will separate you from your watch. You can place the SS bracelet on at your convenience. One of the advantages of the 14060/14060M Submariners and the vintage Sub references is drilled lugs: easy switching of band/bracelet. The hallmark of the tough Rolex tool watch. |
15 March 2020, 06:30 PM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,127
|
Quote:
|
|
18 March 2020, 01:08 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NB, TX
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 1,012
|
I took the family to Maui about 10 years ago. On the plane out, my 16520 Daytona managed to have a screw down pusher disappear completely, so I wore my 25 year old OysterQuartz most of the time. We went out on a dive boat and while the kids dove, the wife and I snorkeled above - I was wearing the OQ. It didn't miss a beat, and didn't suffer from any salt water intrusions. I've done the same with my Speedmaster, which only has a 50M pressure rating. Same results - no issues whatever.
I am firmly of the opinion that there is widespread fear mongering about wearing ANY mechanical watch in water by watch dealers and watch wearers. This isn't the 1930's people!
__________________
TT OysterQuartz, SS/Black "U" Daytona, TT GMT II-C, DD OysterQuartz, Breitling Aerospace, Omega Speedmaster Pro |
18 March 2020, 10:01 PM | #25 | |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,477
|
Quote:
|
|
2 April 2020, 10:30 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NB, TX
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 1,012
|
YMMV. Be sure to update us on your results!
__________________
TT OysterQuartz, SS/Black "U" Daytona, TT GMT II-C, DD OysterQuartz, Breitling Aerospace, Omega Speedmaster Pro |
3 April 2020, 12:17 PM | #27 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Toronto
Watch: ♕
Posts: 1,997
|
I thought the same thing, bought a Seiko diver and brought my Rolex DD (year 2000) to Aruba, thinking I'd wear the Seiko swimming and diving.
Wore the Seiko once, then just left my DD on the entire trip. Only time I changed it was to go ATV'ing, and link in the bracelet came very close to popping out, should've left the DD on. But it was great wearing the DD, that's what they're made for, they're tanks. |
8 April 2020, 03:51 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: maryland
Watch: GMT II Evr, SUB
Posts: 563
|
I still wear my 1985 submariner 35 years old in the ocean and pool every chance I get, just make sure you have the crown screwed in, and its been serviced and you will be fine, they are made for this...
|
20 April 2020, 09:38 AM | #29 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Australia
Watch: 1603
Posts: 326
|
Quote:
I'd have more faith in a recently serviced 16xx Datejust over a Seiko SKX that hasn't been pressure tested in 5 years. |
|
20 April 2020, 10:15 AM | #30 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,049
|
Quote:
Anytime you go in the water there is risk. The question is "do you accept that risk". I don't risk my hard-to-replace watches, not because I think that they are compromised, but because the risk of losing a tritium dial isn't one I choose to accept.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.