The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 November 2011, 09:41 AM   #31
eagle_lex
"TRF" Member
 
eagle_lex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Ed
Location: Lexington, Ky
Watch: AP and Rolex
Posts: 541
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
The only problem Ed is that the Diver shows no signs of cooling off and many fans are waiting for used examples.
yea i know you are very RIGHT! im trying to convince myself over here! ha ha
for me a 15k watch would be my biggest single watch purchase. i will probably need to sell my breitling or something to help justify it a little.
eagle_lex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 November 2011, 10:50 AM   #32
tifosi
"TRF" Member
 
tifosi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Russ
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 5,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
Charles posted one 3 hrs ago on TZ.

http://forums.timezone.com/index.php...=5915220&rid=0
That is a pretty good price too!
__________________
Russ
tifosi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 November 2011, 01:08 PM   #33
tifosi
"TRF" Member
 
tifosi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Russ
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 5,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle_lex View Post
yea i know you are very RIGHT! im trying to convince myself over here! ha ha
for me a 15k watch would be my biggest single watch purchase. i will probably need to sell my breitling or something to help justify it a little.
This will be my biggest single watch purchase as well. I can't wait tho. I want this AP.

I think I decided to save for a bit and just see what happens. I don't think I'm ready to get rid of my sub for it. I want both so it will just be a matter of time.
__________________
Russ
tifosi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2011, 01:59 AM   #34
eagle_lex
"TRF" Member
 
eagle_lex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Ed
Location: Lexington, Ky
Watch: AP and Rolex
Posts: 541
I think u are making a good decision Russ.... Or at least thats what im going to do. Just save a little and see what comes available. Good luck!
eagle_lex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2011, 05:05 AM   #35
tifosi
"TRF" Member
 
tifosi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Russ
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 5,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle_lex View Post
I think u are making a good decision Russ.... Or at least thats what im going to do. Just save a little and see what comes available. Good luck!
Thanks! Same to you. So we are both hunting the same piece?? Do I see a bidding war in our future?? LOL
__________________
Russ
tifosi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2011, 05:21 AM   #36
eagle_lex
"TRF" Member
 
eagle_lex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Ed
Location: Lexington, Ky
Watch: AP and Rolex
Posts: 541
ha ha! im sure you will have yours before i have one! i take my sweet time. i wait forever so i know for sure im in love with it!
eagle_lex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2011, 03:14 PM   #37
emagni
"TRF" Member
 
emagni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: on Earth
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 1,283
One of our favorite grey dealer Oscar (BodyBump) has an AP diver in mint condition if you want it now. http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=203727
__________________
Watches: More than my fingers can count
emagni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2011, 03:52 PM   #38
psv
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North America
Posts: 11,066
Russ, asking if you should buy a watch around here is liking drug addicts if you should try a new heroine or something! ;-)

I've owned the RO Diver and it is a wonderfully manufactured watch that ozes quality, however I would never own one as my only watch! To start with, it is +$18,000 for a stainless steel dive watch without complications on a rubber strap. The finishing on the case is flawless but it also rather sensitive to scratches and wear. Additionally, I don't think a diver on a rubber strap works in all environments. Sure, you can always buy the AP bracelet but that is another $2,000.

I don't know. You do have a very classy and great every day watch in the SubC, I would much prefer that watch as my only one over the AP Diver. The fact that you are just about to get engaged and then married speaks even more for the Sub I think and then put the money towards the rest of your life.

The RO Diver will surely be around for many, many years to come. Sure, it will be over $20k from AD but that is why we have a used market! :-)
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2011, 02:26 AM   #39
Tony-GB
"TRF" Member
 
Tony-GB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
Russ, asking if you should buy a watch around here is liking drug addicts if you should try a new heroine or something! ;-)

I've owned the RO Diver and it is a wonderfully manufactured watch that ozes quality, however I would never own one as my only watch! To start with, it is +$18,000 for a stainless steel dive watch without complications on a rubber strap. The finishing on the case is flawless but it also rather sensitive to scratches and wear. Additionally, I don't think a diver on a rubber strap works in all environments. Sure, you can always buy the AP bracelet but that is another $2,000.

I don't know. You do have a very classy and great every day watch in the SubC, I would much prefer that watch as my only one over the AP Diver. The fact that you are just about to get engaged and then married speaks even more for the Sub I think and then put the money towards the rest of your life.

The RO Diver will surely be around for many, many years to come. Sure, it will be over $20k from AD but that is why we have a used market! :-)
Sound advice there. The Diver isn't going anywhere & if anything will expand in range. Dial options & maybe gold options.
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?"

http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/

www.cheetah.org
Tony-GB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2011, 06:21 AM   #40
Submarino
"TRF" Member
 
Submarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
The AP Diver in a heartbeat. Nothing compares to the feel of a AP ROO or any other AP on your wrist. A brand with a ton of history, legacy and 'haute manufacture'.
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER

Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Submarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2011, 08:04 AM   #41
tifosi
"TRF" Member
 
tifosi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Russ
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 5,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
Russ, asking if you should buy a watch around here is liking drug addicts if you should try a new heroine or something! ;-)

I've owned the RO Diver and it is a wonderfully manufactured watch that ozes quality, however I would never own one as my only watch! To start with, it is +$18,000 for a stainless steel dive watch without complications on a rubber strap. The finishing on the case is flawless but it also rather sensitive to scratches and wear. Additionally, I don't think a diver on a rubber strap works in all environments. Sure, you can always buy the AP bracelet but that is another $2,000.

I don't know. You do have a very classy and great every day watch in the SubC, I would much prefer that watch as my only one over the AP Diver. The fact that you are just about to get engaged and then married speaks even more for the Sub I think and then put the money towards the rest of your life.

The RO Diver will surely be around for many, many years to come. Sure, it will be over $20k from AD but that is why we have a used market! :-)
Great post. Thanks. You are exactly right...I would not want the AP as my only watch. It does not work in all situations like the Sub does. I just think this "next level" of watchmaking is calling me. I just lust after this AP. I hate the term, but maybe it should just remain my "Grail".....
__________________
Russ
tifosi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2011, 09:26 AM   #42
psv
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North America
Posts: 11,066
Quote:
Originally Posted by tifosi View Post
Great post. Thanks. You are exactly right...I would not want the AP as my only watch. It does not work in all situations like the Sub does. I just think this "next level" of watchmaking is calling me. I just lust after this AP. I hate the term, but maybe it should just remain my "Grail".....
Grail as a term should be killed off! It never works, because as soon as you get it 2 weeks passes and you are back to looking that the FS sections again to see what's next! :-)

Overall, it is sort of odd really, spending this much money on a "sport watch" (I would call the ROO Diver a 'sport watch' more than a diving tool) as it something you by definition will use while you are being very active and probably bang up the watch. That's the advantage of my Rolex divers, I use them 24/7, they do take a hit but nothing to worry about really. Oh well, at the end I found the whole thing a bit oversubscribed and I sold off my ROO Diver. I'll use my Rolex as sport watches and reserve the higher end pieces for more dress watch scenarios. I think.
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2011, 10:13 AM   #43
eagle_lex
"TRF" Member
 
eagle_lex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Ed
Location: Lexington, Ky
Watch: AP and Rolex
Posts: 541
Man these guys give good advice. Everyone looks at it differently based on lifestyles and availability of funds. To me an AP would be foolish but i still want one. So thats why ill wait for a nicely preowned one when they are not the latest greatest. For now ill enjoy looking at your guys' pics of them!
eagle_lex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2011, 11:46 AM   #44
tifosi
"TRF" Member
 
tifosi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Russ
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 5,760
On a side note...I just had this on...WOW. What a piece.

First shot is the one I had on. They didn't have the black/black.
__________________
Russ
tifosi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2011, 12:09 PM   #45
Andrés G
"TRF" Member
 
Andrés G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 3,391
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
Overall, it is sort of odd really, spending this much money on a "sport watch" (I would call the ROO Diver a 'sport watch' more than a diving tool) as it something you by definition will use while you are being very active and probably bang up the watch. That's the advantage of my Rolex divers, I use them 24/7, they do take a hit but nothing to worry about really. Oh well, at the end I found the whole thing a bit oversubscribed and I sold off my ROO Diver. I'll use my Rolex as sport watches and reserve the higher end pieces for more dress watch scenarios. I think.
I agree 100% and that´s the same reason why I sold my AP Diver. I kept a RO 15300 as a dress watch and traded the Diver for a Sub C and a Speedy plus some cash. I´m very happy and find the Sub C a more versatile watch.
Andrés G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2011, 12:51 PM   #46
tifosi
"TRF" Member
 
tifosi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Russ
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 5,760
Wow. A lot of people getting rid of the AP Diver...
__________________
Russ
tifosi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.