ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: 16613 vs 16573 | |||
16573 | 5 | 55.56% | |
16613 | 4 | 44.44% | |
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
23 March 2019, 12:24 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: hong kong
Posts: 25
|
16613 & 16753
Hi All,
I'm starting to hunt for a TT Rolex. I'm looking at the black dial sub 16613 and a GMT 16573 black nipple dial on oyster bracelet. As for function I don't really need a GMT as I've got the batman for the task. The sub feels classic and a safe choice plus it is almost 20 years newer than the 16573 therefore I think will have less problems for normal wear or say dipping in the pool. The 16573 black dial with nipple indices plus an acrylic crystal is breathtaking, but I am worried with its age in the long run and not confident to do daily activities with it. Watches I currently own are more contemporary and never owned any 5 digit rolexes before. Can someone give me some input on these two models please. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.