ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 September 2013, 11:55 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Al
Location: USA
Posts: 1,531
|
Also if u have a bigger wrist, subc looks better; if smaller go 16610.
|
28 September 2013, 12:10 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: USA
Watch: GMTII
Posts: 1,180
|
If it were up to me I'd go with an older sub. If you're afraid of pins coming out then I'm sure there's nothing wrong with taking it to a watchmaker and have them replace the pins and put some locktite. It should allay any paranoia of the bracelet falling apart on you. I personally am not a fan of ceramics so I'm biased.
|
28 September 2013, 03:37 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,180
|
|
28 September 2013, 04:13 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Nanaimo, B.C.
Watch: DJ2 Blue Romans
Posts: 1,980
|
There isn't 5 grand to be saved
You can buy new sub ceramics for 6400 and sub date ceramics for 7200 Where are you going to find a pre owned 1400- 2200 sub??
__________________
Everything will be okay in the end. If it's not okay, it's not the end. Life is a cruel teacher It will give you the test first and the lesson later |
28 September 2013, 04:34 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,260
|
Well talking about lifting around 2000 was diving in the Red sea was on a reef called Elphinstone.Now we surfaced just of the reef and the boat picked us up I let all my party get into the boat first.Then I took my fins and BC off but the boat hand got hold of by BC and pulled it up before it was fully off.Now my SD bracelet got caught in one of the links on BC and I was dangling over the side of the boat caught in my SD bracelet.Now I weigh around 15 stone after a few seconds a spring bar must haave failed either a lug or in clasp.Lost the watch in the Red sea but still got my wrist which was quite bruised and sore after but watch was replaced with my dive insurance .At this time on return to UK could not find a SD in my area had to wait till next trip far east finally replaced SD in Singapore.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
28 September 2013, 04:40 PM | #36 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Anastasios
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 8,497
|
You say vintage subs vs subs C's...I think you mean used subs vs subs C's
You also say that you are keen to save 5,000 by buying a used sub and then you mention your preference for the LV (for a tool ?). Any sub you buy will be a great move... i just doubt you can save 5k if you buy well used |
28 September 2013, 04:59 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Russ
Location: Dallas Texas
Watch: 5513
Posts: 2,124
|
Hard to beat a 14060 as a weekend, get wet, don't set the date, iconic watch
|
28 September 2013, 09:14 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Melbourne
Watch: 16610, Tudor 1960
Posts: 1,554
|
Like you said, create your own stories.
Buy a new SubC and fill it with your own stories. This watch shall be no one else's but your stories. The SubC is just such a gorgeous beauty. |
28 September 2013, 09:57 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,127
|
Would agree with what someone said earlier - get the one that you really like. Whilst the build quality of some of the newer sports models is arguably tougher due to some of the newer metals now used, I doubt you would have to worry about any of them in normal wear. With any of these watches, if subject to serious abuse, there is a risk of failure somewhere, particularly in the pins, but nothing to really worry about in daily use. unless you are really unlucky! If you are going somewhere extreme or doing something 'heavy', a quick temporary swap out to a NATO pretty much takes care of it. They were undoubtedly built to last. Good luck with whatever you go for!
|
28 September 2013, 11:43 PM | #40 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Detroit Michigan
Watch: 18078
Posts: 1,142
|
With less parts and no welds I think the old clasp will hold up just fine. It's all ready proven that.
|
28 September 2013, 11:52 PM | #41 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 149
|
Get the ceramic Sub Date first with lume, sapphire, dealer warranty, glidelock, etc..
Then if you have enough money and still fancy an older watch for aesthetic reasons consider a 14060 / 5513 / 1680 for weekends etc. Best of both worlds. |
29 September 2013, 12:07 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
A-serial Rolex 16600 Seadweller. Drilled-through lug holes, sapphire, luminova........you just gotta love it. If I get sand under the bezel.....no problem. I just pop-off the bezel and clean under it. It's a 5 min DIY job. This is the last of the true Rolex tool watches IMHO
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
29 September 2013, 12:18 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Marcus
Location: Texas Gulf Coast
Watch: 116610
Posts: 248
|
|
29 September 2013, 12:51 AM | #44 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 61,274
|
I like subs w/ lug holes
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
29 September 2013, 06:14 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 2,205
|
If you insist!
Archduke - Get the ceramic Sub Date first with lume, sapphire, dealer warranty, glidelock, etc.. Then if you have enough money and still fancy an older watch for aesthetic reasons consider a 14060 / 5513 / 1680 for weekends etc. Best of both worlds. Yes! |
29 September 2013, 06:22 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: bp, hu, eu
Watch: dj 16234, 116610ln
Posts: 2,376
|
this was my reason for buying the subc. all subs are nice, i don't have anything against the old models and would not be wanting a subc if i had bought a 16610 earlier but wanted a spanking new watch with my name on the card once not something with a history. as you pointed out, making my own stories.
good luck with your choice!
__________________
16234 jubilee dial, 116610 ln, grand seiko sbgm221g, omega speedmaster mark II, longines legend diver, breguet 3910, nomos club campus 38, swatch sistem51, mares nemo, seiko ripley, g-shock rangeman instagram: modus_horologicus |
29 September 2013, 04:26 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,032
|
Can't go wrong either way, that is for sure.
I have both types of subs. While the sub c is not perfect, higher bezel seems to make it more prone to getting turned on accident an the clasp is huge. But when wearing both, the Sub C gets my vote. But get what YOU want. Rolex will never go back and the sub C is here to stay. |
29 September 2013, 04:59 PM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Henry
Location: TW/SoCal
Posts: 1,632
|
First of all...it ain't a tool watch unless you're a diver or use it for whatever you do...wearing a watch in an active life does not make it a tool watch.
Second, I'd go with the Sub-C, much better much improved watch in about every way you can think of.... Vintage is just personal preference, some people like its look but if you want a better watch, go with the C. I've owned two Red Subs before and if I can only choose between one of them and a Sub-C, I'd definitely go with the C. |
29 September 2013, 08:40 PM | #49 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 32,211
|
Ultimately, one of each.
Start with the 116610LV and start saving for a vintage piece. |
29 September 2013, 09:02 PM | #50 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 149
|
Quote:
|
|
29 September 2013, 10:01 PM | #51 | ||
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 71,828
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
||
29 September 2013, 10:08 PM | #52 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
|
Same here
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe |
29 September 2013, 10:13 PM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Trav
Location: singapore
Watch: it
Posts: 2,312
|
Water resistance is more of an issue in older subs than bracelet failing don't you think?
|
30 September 2013, 04:51 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Miami
Posts: 82
|
|
30 September 2013, 05:08 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 218
|
If a old/vintage watch has been pressure tested, there shouldn't be any issues. The component that is most likely to fail and let water in would be the gaskets, and they are always new. Someone please correct me if Im wrong.
|
30 September 2013, 11:53 PM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Water resistance is an issue with even a newer sub if it has not been properly maintained. Regular service and new gaskets are a MUST on all watches to maintain proper water resistance and gasket integrity. I have been diving with my 42 year-old 5513 with no issues whatsoever. It has been serviced recently with a pressure test. Don't just assume that your watch is water resistant since it is "newish". This might work for a couple years, but your risk of water ingress increases as the age of the watch increases. I wouldn't dive with a 5 year-old watch without a pressure test.
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
1 October 2013, 12:01 AM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,301
|
Any vintage watch will run the risk of failure of old parts, inaccuracy and/or lack of a viable service center or even parts. So if you got all these covered, a Vintage Rolex will definitely be a topic-starter and a head-turner.
I do however want the failsafe assurance that I won't get any of the above issues so I went for an 116610LN even if a 16610 is around the corner at a lower price. So to answer you, if you can afford the LV, I'd go for it hands down. |
1 October 2013, 01:12 AM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Earth
Watch: Air-King 5500
Posts: 2,609
|
|
1 October 2013, 09:23 AM | #59 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Quote:
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
|
2 October 2013, 02:52 PM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Miami
Posts: 82
|
If sand gets under the bezel of the Sub-C, is that a potential problem?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.