The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex WatchTech

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 October 2008, 11:00 AM   #1
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,037
Is A Rolex Really Better ???

These discussions always seem to get out of hand and folks start saying that just because one movement is capable of meeting the COSC standard, then it must be just as good as any other movement that can meet the same standard..

They cite this as proof that "their" movement is as good as another, and then say they have a better clasp, so that their watch is overall "better". Or they say that their clear case back shows some nice designs and evidence of superior workmanship,(we're not sure superior to what) therefore it is "better".

This shows no understanding in what makes the watch tick....

So.........let's talk about what makes a Rolex movement actually better, from an engineering perspective, than others..

1. All Rolex movements have a full balance bridge. This adds stability and superior support to the balance which is the brains of your movement. Many others do not.

2. Rolex uses screw locks to hold the movement in the case...no clips, no bend tabs...solid mounting.. it won't move around in the case.

3. Free sprung balance. This allows free movement of the hairspring and it is not attached, or anchored to a regulator screw, but rather the balance wheel is timed by actually adjusting the inertia of the wheel (balance screws, kind of like balancing your car wheels) itself rather than just adjusting the length of the spring

4. Breguet over-coil hairspring. This is known to help the watch keep more consistent time as the mainspring unwinds so the watch is accurate over a broader range of power from the traditional flat-spring used in other makes.

5. 31 jeweled movements as a standard so jewels are at all wear points rather than 23, 25, or 27 as found in many other high end watches.

6. 10mm balance wheels. More mass equals more stability and more consistent operation during use. It is much more difficult to disturb the heavier mass of a Rolex balance wheel than it is on the typical 9mm balance wheel of other watches.

7. Teflon coated reverser wheels for smooth and quiet, lifetime operation.

8. A removable and easy to disassemble reverser module for easy cleaning rather than a fixed and riveted module as used in some others.

9. Rolex uses additional gearing to run the center seconds which results in a slightly thicker movement, but one that is stronger and more stable.

10. Cam, jewel, and spring actuation of the date change function. This allows you to change the date in a Rolex at any time, without issue, because the date change function is disassociated from the hand stack gears. Many other movements will be broken if you change the date between 9pm and 3am. It also snaps the date over instantaneously.

I'll stop here before you fall asleep....

But I will say.............This is why my Rolex is better than your XXXXX watch..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 11:07 AM   #2
Ivy League
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Earth
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 448
Hey that's great Larry.
Thanks for the great info. This lends testimony and good reference to all those Rolex haters who claim that their Walmart casio is just as good if not better than Rolex.
Ivy League is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 11:09 AM   #3
GradyPhilpott
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 116710 BLNR
Posts: 34,343
Those are some interesting details.

I've seen you around the boards, Larry.

Whence comes all this esoterica?
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 11:12 AM   #4
meloncap78
"TRF" Member
 
meloncap78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Joshua
Location: Syracuse, NY
Watch: LV C
Posts: 2,204
Excellent information Larry. I enjoyed reading every morsel of it.
meloncap78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 11:13 AM   #5
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
ZZZZZZzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZ















Great info
__________________



GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 11:15 AM   #6
Ed Rooney
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
That's all very interesting, but I hear that they don't keep very good time.
Ed Rooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 11:24 AM   #7
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Rooney View Post
That's all very interesting, but I hear that they don't keep very good time.
But they don't keep it, better than many other brands............
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 11:33 AM   #8
cody p
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: Air-King 114200
Posts: 2,878
my only criticism is the lack of ball bearings at the rotor pivot (cal. 4130 excepted). better? better than what?
robust, accurate, easily serviced, sure.
cody p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 11:35 AM   #9
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
Great info. From my side, the perception of Rolex is better. For me, that's enough !
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 11:39 AM   #10
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
Great stuff, Larry.

Could you please elaborate #8 - haven't understood a word. Some pics, if possible.

Thanks - JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 11:48 AM   #11
Dylan Wade
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: BC, Canada
Watch: EXP II
Posts: 545
Good to know, thanks for taking the time to share.

I'm with JJ on #8 and to be honest on one or two other items mentioned but I'll work those out in time...........most makes sense to me.

Thanks again
Dylan Wade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 11:54 AM   #12
Lol-x
Facilitator
 
Lol-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,227
These Rolex watches simply have appeal.

The watch has a standard of quality that in some ways what many of us would strive to achieve in our personal aspects of life.

In other aspects the watch provides a level of deep satisfaction.

Maybe this sense of satisfaction isn't just from the watch but to some extent from marketing, the stories of others and our own personal experiences with a very personal possession.
__________________

Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln
Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy

ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim
Lol-x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 12:17 PM   #13
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
Great stuff, Larry.

Could you please elaborate #8 - haven't understood a word. Some pics, if possible.

Thanks - JJ
Here is the reversing module, the famous "red wheels" seen under the winding weight.

This sits on top of the movement and as the weight swings either way, it "reverses" to provide winding of the watch in either direction.

It is completely disassemble-able for cleaning and repairs. and the red color is the teflon coating that makes it run smoothly, dependably, and quietly.



__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 12:18 PM   #14
Blimms
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex/Breitling/BR
Posts: 200
Larry, you are well versed on many fronts !!! Knowledge is King.

Regards
Blimms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 12:28 PM   #15
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Here is the reversing module, the famous "red wheels" seen under the winding weight.

This sits on top of the movement and as the weight swings either way, it "reverses" to provide winding of the watch in either direction.

It is completely disassemble-able for cleaning and repairs. and the red color is the teflon coating that makes it run smoothly, dependably, and quietly.



Thanks, Larry.....excellent info!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 12:28 PM   #16
jmsrolls
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
Thanks for all the info, Larry!

And I though a watch was just a watch.

Fr. John+
jmsrolls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 12:33 PM   #17
eric23
"TRF" Member
 
eric23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
Great info Larry!
eric23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 12:49 PM   #18
limbo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 4,624
Wow. Very informative. Thanks for sharing. Posts like this one is one of the reasons TRF is the best.
limbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 01:18 PM   #19
Bisquitlips
2024 Pledge Member
 
Bisquitlips's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Richard
Location: USA
Watch: YM Deep Space
Posts: 12,501
This is a keeper!!!
__________________
Rolex Yacht-Master 40mm (SS-YG / Deep Space MOP) 16623
Breitling Aerospace Titanium / 18K with UTC.
Omega Speedmaster 3510.50
Oris TT1 Pro Diver Regulator 43MM
Bisquitlips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 04:08 PM   #20
ROLEX MAN
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
ROLEX MAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: land down under
Watch: you? "YES PLEASE"!
Posts: 3,682
Doesn't it just tell the time!
__________________


it's not just about telling the time...

happy rolexing...



I'm just a man with a passion
ROLEX MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 04:12 PM   #21
The_Scroop
"TRF" Member
 
The_Scroop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Dom
Location: Melbourne
Watch: Sub 16610
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post

10. Cam, jewel, and spring actuation of the date change function. This allows you to change the date in a Rolex at any time, without issue, because the date change function is disassociated from the hand stack gears. Many other movements will be broken if you change the date between 9pm and 3am. It also snaps the date over instantaneously.
Thanks for posting this, especially point number 10. I had no idea about that, and on its own I think that is enough for me to say that my Rolex is far better than my Breitling (which can break if I change the date between 10 and 2)
__________________
- Rolex Daytona White 116520
- Rolex Submariner 16610
- Rolex Datejust II tt w/gold romans
- Breitling Chronomat Evolution SS
- Omega Seamaster Professional
The_Scroop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 04:14 PM   #22
SirLoki
"TRF" Member
 
SirLoki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Fullerton, CA
Watch: GMT Master II
Posts: 916
wow i feel even better after reading this, thanks!
__________________
16710N Y 116710LN M 116400 V 116660 V

RIP JJ

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
The best bastidization I've ever seen on TRF!!
SirLoki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 04:28 PM   #23
kiasunkiasi
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 101
Great info...

Just wanna add on to the first point, I know majority of Rolex owners thought Rolex invented and used the full balance bridge... The truth is Rolex is not the first watch company that comes out with full balance bridge... Seiko and Citizen did that in the 50s and 60s...

We Rolex-er be humble...
kiasunkiasi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 04:33 PM   #24
golfball123
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: thailand / m'sia
Watch: YG DD & GMT,TT SUB
Posts: 1,265
very informative... thanks
__________________
Present Collections
TT Date-just,
TT Sub. (Bluesy),
YG Date-Date,
YG GMT IIc (Black dial). SS GMT IIc
golfball123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 08:11 PM   #25
Troy
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Troy
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Watch: Tudor Sub. 7928
Posts: 1,275
Good post
Troy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2008, 08:19 PM   #26
unclesallie
2024 Pledge Member
 
unclesallie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: dan
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: keystone pocket
Posts: 5,915
thanks, excellent information!
unclesallie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2008, 09:12 AM   #27
StereoPhe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 2
Thanks for share!Great !!!
StereoPhe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2008, 09:56 AM   #28
chicagowatchman
"TRF" Member
 
chicagowatchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago IL
Watch: Platinum DDMasterp
Posts: 1,983
Rolex has been and wil always be my Number 1 Watch

__________________
Men's Platinum Day Date Masterpiece
Men's 18k Day Date Crown Collection
Men's Franck Muller 18k Conquistador Cortez
Men's SS Cartier Pasha

MEMBER # 5534 USA
CHICAGO IL
chicagowatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2008, 10:11 AM   #29
zeppe19avr
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Robert
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: Sea-dweller Z ser.
Posts: 67
Thanks lots, Larry for this info, I appreciate getting technical info like this.. Many thanks again.
zeppe19avr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2008, 10:32 AM   #30
Perdu
"TRF" Member
 
Perdu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Gary
Location: GMT-6
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,350
Larry,

I'm just having problems visualizing a free sprung balance if you could say some more? Also, you can add microsteller adjustment to the list. Many of the points you made are why I chose a Rolex movement but not being technical I don't know how important they are. Point 4 seems to be very important to performance but does a full balance bridge really make any difference? I always compare my Rolex 3135 to my Omega 1128. The Rolex should be a more consistent time keeper - it has a better design. But will it make any practical difference? So far, there is no difference in performance. I do know that the Omega will not keep to COSC if left to unwind and it will be interesting to test the Rolex here - I suspect it will do better. One thing's for sure, you can't ever go wrong with a Rolex movement.
__________________
Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire
Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500

Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter
Perdu is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.