ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Which one would you pick? | |||
PAM587 | 21 | 45.65% | |
PAM622 | 15 | 32.61% | |
Neither | 10 | 21.74% | |
Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10 January 2017, 01:31 PM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,870
|
587 or 622
Been drawn to these two models lately. Which would you choose? I've already had many other Panerai models but now only have the 372.
|
10 January 2017, 01:47 PM | #2 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 3,324
|
I wish I can try the 372 to see how it fits on my small wrist. I'm starting to get the Panerai bug lol
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
__________________
2FA-Enabled Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019 |
10 January 2017, 01:56 PM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,870
|
|
10 January 2017, 01:59 PM | #4 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 3,324
|
You're right, looks great on you.
Actually I bought my first Panerai (44mm) thinking that it's too big but to my surprise I love it. I need to visit local AD and try on the 372👍🙏 Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
__________________
2FA-Enabled Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019 |
10 January 2017, 02:06 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
I would go 622 because the 587 looks close to the 372 good luck mike
|
10 January 2017, 04:20 PM | #6 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,492
|
587 is an MM and has more historically accurate features, but, for me, the 622 for the font, hands and rarity.
|
10 January 2017, 04:35 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: dp
Location: chicago, usa
Watch: panerai
Posts: 2,369
|
....sorry I thought you said 662....
I love mine....
__________________
dp just living the dream chicago, usa chgo_risti on IG |
10 January 2017, 05:32 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,924
|
I'm not a fan of Radiomirs so I voted neither. However, if someone used very harsh language and made me wear one, it would be the 587. I would leave it behind in a zombie apocalypse though, harsh language or not.
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737 "Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
|
11 January 2017, 03:35 AM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,870
|
|
11 January 2017, 03:58 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Not crazy about Rads, but in this case I would go with the 587 (or the 662!)
__________________
|
11 January 2017, 04:02 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,099
|
Wears a little large on 6.5 wrist
|
11 January 2017, 04:25 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
|
11 January 2017, 05:29 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,372
|
if you can source a 622..I go that route...
yes MM is nice but its way nicer to get a Panerai Radiomir on the dial and more limited..this coming from a 339 owner I am not a fan of painted dials so 662 is no go for me..
__________________
too much into watches... |
11 January 2017, 11:45 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
|
587's hands don't look proportional to me. If you are looking at no crown guard, why not look at Radiomirs???? 232/249 are TOPS!
__________________
member#3242 |
12 January 2017, 07:25 AM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,870
|
|
25 June 2017, 11:50 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New york
Posts: 108
|
587 all the way
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
26 June 2017, 11:22 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New york
Posts: 108
|
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
26 June 2017, 11:30 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: KOTA KINABALU
Posts: 16
|
587
|
26 June 2017, 03:24 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,180
|
587 for me, I love the MM. I've never owned either of them though, so my opinion doesn't carry much weight.
Thanks for posting the pics of the 372 on your wrist. My wrist is the same size and I had always assumed that a 372 would be too big on me, but after seeing your pics I may have to go try one on myself. There is hope! |
26 June 2017, 04:38 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,245
|
how about 687 faded dial?
|
4 July 2017, 04:27 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 211
|
I voted 587. I haven't compared these two in real life, but from the pictures, it looks like the 587 will wear a little bit smaller (optically) due to the slightly different dial layout (number closer to the center).
I tried the 662 on the other day, and I think its gorgeous. Wish I had larger wrists. Did you make a decision yet? |
4 July 2017, 07:28 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Lots
Posts: 4,354
|
I like both, but In full honesty, I prefer my 232 to both of them, and now seems like a good time to buy a 232.
|
4 July 2017, 11:03 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: KOTA KINABALU
Posts: 16
|
587
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.