ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 October 2022, 10:05 PM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: PA
Posts: 5
|
Tudor 78500 bracelet without markings?
Hello, can anyone confirm if Tudor produced 78500 bracelets that did not have “78500” engraved in the last links? Clasp is engraved “78500” and “Z5”. Has 10 links total, 5 on either side of the clasp. Just trying to confirm it’s genuine and not something someone put together using an aftermarket 78500/93150 knock off with a Tudor clasp/diving extension.
|
13 October 2022, 08:42 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Texas
Watch: Tudor Snowflake
Posts: 1,048
|
Show the band
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
14 October 2022, 05:48 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: PA
Posts: 5
|
images attached
|
17 October 2022, 08:36 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Texas
Watch: Tudor Snowflake
Posts: 1,048
|
You have the box there? Where did you get it?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
17 October 2022, 10:32 PM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: PA
Posts: 5
|
|
21 October 2022, 01:30 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
I asked because I recently bought a late 1997 79190 submariner and it has the same unmarked linked bracelet on it, however it has the correct marked authentic 380b endlinks and a correct 78500 marked clasp with a Z4 date code. I initially thought maybe someone swapped out the links for aftermarket but now I am not so sure. A local watchmaker took a look at the links and screw pins and was leaning towards the authentic side. I looked at a bunch of sold/unsold listings for the same reference and what I've come up with was that maybe the very first 78500 bracelets that were shipped on watches might not have been stamped. 79190's with serial numbers up until about B93xxx or B94xxx have the folded 9315 with the appropriate marked clasp and then switched to the solid 78500 bracelet. All of the 79190 listings with these serial numbers and later seem to have the unmarked bracelet if with the appropriate clasp date code. Any I have seen with the link stamped bracelet have a later date code on the clasp suggesting it was ordered and added later on. The bracelet posted by the OP has a Z5 date code on the clasp which would support my theory. So if I am right it looks like they might have switched around mid to late 1997 which was a transition period for Tudor anyways when they were moving away from Rolex marked parts, i.e. caseback, crown, ect... This said I am solely going of several listings I have been able to dig up on the internet and there aren't a ton around for this specific time period. This is obviously fueled by wishful thinking on my part due to owning one and not wanting to buy another bracelet. However it is nice knowing that and AD can source one for far less than what I see people selling them for. I think the wait time is only a few weeks. But I guess it is worth knowing if someone wants to find out if their watch is all original. I would love to hear any info from people on here. |
|
23 October 2022, 02:05 PM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Texas
Watch: Tudor Snowflake
Posts: 1,048
|
I’m curious what you paid for it? I walked into a Rolex dealer and paid $1250 for a full 12 link 93150 w/580 endlinks for my 94110.
I bought a 78500 3-4 years ago for $750 or so, I bet they are 8-900 from a Tudor dealer. If you have a watch without a band you can order one from a dealer. I don’t like the fact that it doesn’t have the 78500 on it personally. Linesiders would be the one to ask about it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
23 October 2022, 02:07 PM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Texas
Watch: Tudor Snowflake
Posts: 1,048
|
Derp, I see you ordered one. I think you made the right move.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
26 October 2022, 03:20 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
I see the ebay bracelet has been relisted but with clear pictures of the unmarked last links. The seller says it came off a 79190 with a H102xxx serial which would mean the watch head would have been one of the last in production, late 1998 or even early 1999? There are no photos of the watch to prove this serial number though. The Z5 clasp code would be correct for that. |
|
28 October 2022, 04:07 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 11
|
I noticed two recent listings with the unmarked 78500 bracelet in the last couple of days. The first is on ebay with what I am assuming is a 1997 or 1998 produced 79190. However the date code on the clasp is just out of frame and the pictures are not the best quality. I messaged the seller asking if he could provide the first part of the serial number.
The second listing is for a 79090 that would not have come with a 78500 but it appears someone may have taken an early one off of another watch and put it on. No last link marking but you can see the end link stamp and the Z4 clasp code. I am a new member so I cannot post links, if anyone is interested the ebay listing is the most recent under the search "Tudor 79190" and has the steel bezel insert. The second is on reddit's r/watchexchange and posted as "Tudor Submariner 79090" by the user u/SyndicateHouse I realize I could be beating a dead horse here but I feel like this could be valuable information for those who may have one of these bracelets. The value and originality of a watch could vary a decent amount depending on if the bracelet is deemed original or not. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.