ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

TheDude · 9 March 2010, 11:14 PM

Always loved the titanium+tobacco, and it has an in-house 8 days (2002/9)

This is the smaller 42mm PAM 338, but it shows how nice it looks on the wrist...

mfer · 10 March 2010, 12:40 AM

I'd be a LOT more excited with no cyclops or no date.

Keith48 · 10 March 2010, 01:07 AM

Sorry if this have been asked before......what is the RRP for these.

only if the 346 is with date but NO cyclops.....i think it will be nicer

Trurolexer · 10 March 2010, 01:59 AM

Great watch, bad cyclops.

canwatchco · 10 March 2010, 02:12 AM

I love the cyclops! That is one honey of a watch.

mdtddd2007 · 10 March 2010, 05:55 AM

Its like the 190 I like....but now w/in house movt. and withe date. wish it didn't have that cyclop. Guest if you really want one you can get used to.

TheDude · 10 March 2010, 06:19 AM

Yeah, the smaller 42mm 338 is nice - same "titanio" designation and use of titanium/steel. Black dial, no date. Missing the in-house movement also.

HL65 · 10 March 2010, 06:43 AM

Very nice watch as well.

mfer · 10 March 2010, 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDude

Yeah, the smaller 42mm 338 is nice - same "titanio" designation and use of titanium/steel. Black dial, no date. Missing the in-house movement also.

All the new 42mm are in-house movements.

TswaneNguni · 10 March 2010, 01:24 PM

Ti/brown dial/gold hands =

ocwatching · 10 March 2010, 01:45 PM

this watch is actually my backup if the 339 does not come my way...
like it a lot...this and the 287

Pep04 · 10 March 2010, 01:51 PM

I'd be more excited if it were on MY wrist

CorruptedSanity · 10 March 2010, 04:59 PM

It would have been perfect for me had it not had the silly cyclops.

Brushed case, polished bezel, gold hands, small seconds ,sandwich dial and inhouse movement.

TheDude · 11 March 2010, 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfer

All the new 42mm are in-house movements.

Ahh - interesting. I should pay more attention.

TheDude · 11 March 2010, 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CorruptedSanity

It would have been perfect for me had it not had the silly cyclops.

Brushed case, polished bezel, gold hands, small seconds ,sandwich dial and inhouse movement.

Heh - Brushed -titanium- case and don't forget it's a brown dial!

Shade · 27 June 2011, 01:43 AM

Why didnt I think of this before.. Hmm...... I might like this one better than my 232...

fc3s2k · 27 June 2011, 04:25 AM

Not a fan of thecyclops on a Panerai,
I'll take the 42mm 338.

karmatp · 27 June 2011, 04:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfer

I'd be a LOT more excited with no cyclops or no date.

Exactly. X2

Cru Jones · 27 June 2011, 05:49 AM

The cyclops is fine on the Luminors, but, I'm not 100% convinced on Rads.

Pretty sweet, overall.

heart82 · 27 June 2011, 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfer

I'd be a LOT more excited with no cyclops or no date.

I agree with Mik...no cyclops for me please...date is still ok

Shade · 27 June 2011, 10:51 AM

Hmm I guess I'd have to see for myself regarding that cyclop!

Shade · 6 February 2012, 03:35 AM

Reliving an old thread.. A friend is asking if he should get this watch.. I wonder what are people's opinions these days regarding it?

WatchMeGo · 6 February 2012, 04:39 AM

id love to see some pics!! anyone got any??

Rollie2011 · 6 February 2012, 08:10 AM

Love it

B. Doggy · 6 February 2012, 08:27 AM

I'd be all over it if it were SS and no date.

Speed · 6 February 2012, 08:32 AM

That Clops pours ice water on my lap.

Shade · 6 February 2012, 10:39 AM

Yeah I thought the same thing about the cuclops when I saw it in person, it kinda looked out of place and I think the cyclops doesnt really cover the date properly somehow. I cant really explain it in words..

mikebrad · 6 February 2012, 12:09 PM

i like it but its cleaner with out the cyclops

LigerBelair · 24 March 2019, 11:08 AM

Thoughts re this model today?

synequano · 25 March 2019, 02:55 AM

Buy what you like,personally I find it a bit too chubby for a radiomir but I love the titanium and rear PR

For the current pre owned price,it’s tempting if that’s what you’re looking for..

9 March 2010, 11:14 PM	#1
TheDude "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: DC Area, USA Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660 Posts: 4,483	Anyone else excited about the PAM 346? Always loved the titanium+tobacco, and it has an in-house 8 days (2002/9) This is the smaller 42mm PAM 338, but it shows how nice it looks on the wrist...

10 March 2010, 12:40 AM	#2
mfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mik Location: USA Posts: 13,723	I'd be a LOT more excited with no cyclops or no date. __________________ member#3242

10 March 2010, 06:43 AM	#8
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 63,401	Very nice watch as well. __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

10 March 2010, 01:45 PM	#11
ocwatching "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Phil Location: CA Posts: 5,372	this watch is actually my backup if the 339 does not come my way... like it a lot...this and the 287 __________________ too much into watches...

10 March 2010, 01:51 PM	#12
Pep04 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Pep Location: Miami Watch: GMTIIc, Pam320 Posts: 2,773	I'd be more excited if it were on MY wrist __________________ "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." -Benjamin Franklin Prick #8

10 March 2010, 01:07 AM	#3
Keith48 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: singapore Posts: 68	Sorry if this have been asked before......what is the RRP for these. only if the 346 is with date but NO cyclops.....i think it will be nicer

10 March 2010, 01:59 AM	#4
Trurolexer Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: USA Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex Posts: 18,421	Great watch, bad cyclops.

10 March 2010, 02:12 AM	#5
canwatchco "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Bobby Location: Montreal Posts: 6,425	I love the cyclops! That is one honey of a watch.

10 March 2010, 05:55 AM	#6
mdtddd2007 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: U.S Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS Posts: 5,657	Its like the 190 I like....but now w/in house movt. and withe date. wish it didn't have that cyclop. Guest if you really want one you can get used to.

10 March 2010, 06:19 AM	#7
TheDude "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: DC Area, USA Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660 Posts: 4,483	Yeah, the smaller 42mm 338 is nice - same "titanio" designation and use of titanium/steel. Black dial, no date. Missing the in-house movement also.

10 March 2010, 01:24 PM	#10
TswaneNguni "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: . Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs Posts: 12,608	Ti/brown dial/gold hands =

10 March 2010, 04:59 PM	#13
CorruptedSanity Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Real Name: Saif Location: Abu Dhabi, UAE Watch: AP Posts: 402	It would have been perfect for me had it not had the silly cyclops. Brushed case, polished bezel, gold hands, small seconds ,sandwich dial and inhouse movement.

27 June 2011, 01:43 AM	#16
Shade "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Norman Location: Jakarta Watch: All of 'em.. Posts: 2,926	Why didnt I think of this before.. Hmm...... I might like this one better than my 232... __________________ My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.

27 June 2011, 04:25 AM	#17
fc3s2k "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Barry Location: california Watch: OFFICINE PANERAI Posts: 1,289	Not a fan of thecyclops on a Panerai, I'll take the 42mm 338. __________________

27 June 2011, 05:49 AM	#19
Cru Jones 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 34,499	The cyclops is fine on the Luminors, but, I'm not 100% convinced on Rads. Pretty sweet, overall.

27 June 2011, 10:51 AM	#21
Shade "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Norman Location: Jakarta Watch: All of 'em.. Posts: 2,926	Hmm I guess I'd have to see for myself regarding that cyclop! __________________ My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.

6 February 2012, 03:35 AM	#22
Shade "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Norman Location: Jakarta Watch: All of 'em.. Posts: 2,926	Reliving an old thread.. A friend is asking if he should get this watch.. I wonder what are people's opinions these days regarding it? __________________ My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.

6 February 2012, 04:39 AM	#23
WatchMeGo Banned Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: canada Posts: 130	id love to see some pics!! anyone got any??

6 February 2012, 08:10 AM	#24
Rollie2011 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: John Location: Palm Beach, FL Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42 Posts: 1,654	Love it __________________ John Submariner C LN Explorer 42 Polar

6 February 2012, 08:27 AM	#25
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	I'd be all over it if it were SS and no date. __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

6 February 2012, 08:32 AM	#26
Speed "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: USA Posts: 19,695	That Clops pours ice water on my lap.

6 February 2012, 10:39 AM	#27
Shade "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Norman Location: Jakarta Watch: All of 'em.. Posts: 2,926	Yeah I thought the same thing about the cuclops when I saw it in person, it kinda looked out of place and I think the cyclops doesnt really cover the date properly somehow. I cant really explain it in words.. __________________ My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.

6 February 2012, 12:09 PM	#28
mikebrad "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Real Name: Mike Brad Location: U.S.A. Posts: 18	i like it but its cleaner with out the cyclops

24 March 2019, 11:08 AM	#29
LigerBelair "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2018 Location: San Francisco Watch: Sea-Dweller 50th A Posts: 328	Thoughts re this model today?

25 March 2019, 02:55 AM	#30
synequano Banned Join Date: Dec 2014 Posts: 413	Buy what you like,personally I find it a bit too chubby for a radiomir but I love the titanium and rear PR For the current pre owned price,it’s tempting if that’s what you’re looking for..

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)