|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 June 2012, 12:26 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Montreal
Posts: 148
|
16610 v 116610
Ur o pinion please I don't like the new clasp i fell the old one its better and epic and the ceramic bezel not a fan
__________________
dj 6605 tt dd 1803 sub 16610Lv gmtzodiac TagG carrera wv2211 |
|
|
|
25 June 2012, 12:35 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
Why don you like bout the new clasp and why do you prefer the non-ceramic insert?
|
|
|
|
|
25 June 2012, 12:37 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: Toronto, Canada.
Watch: SD / LV / Daytona
Posts: 2,089
|
I pefer the classic 14060/16610 style, but there's nothing wrong with the new Ceramics, found them more appealing in person than in forum pictures.
|
|
|
|
|
25 June 2012, 12:46 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: Pepsi.
Posts: 5,749
|
Classic all the way 16610.
__________________
- Adam Instagram: @GMTSUBTIME |
|
|
|
|
25 June 2012, 01:00 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: PA
Watch: Sub-c date
Posts: 192
|
If you wear your watch tight or constantly lose, the old clasp is a great choice. If you like to adjust for climate/heat/cold - the newer clasp(s) are awesome. Even just the ezlink once adjusted properly.
|
|
|
|
|
25 June 2012, 03:51 AM
|
#6 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
Classic ones for me as well.
The inserts are cheap to replace at RSC. Love the look of the new ceramic insert though. But the case proportion is why I flipped my 116610
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
|
|
|
|
25 June 2012, 03:58 AM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Sandro
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex/GS
Posts: 4,412
|
Classic for now.
|
|
|
|
|
25 June 2012, 04:04 AM
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: U.K
Watch: Milgauss GV, Sub-C
Posts: 2,178
|
I like both but chose the 116610 as I prefer the ceramic bezel, larger case and the upgrades in general.
So Sub-C for me. 
|
|
|
|
|
25 June 2012, 04:08 AM
|
#9 |
|
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 61,707
|
Bah humbug....if you can buy a 16610, do it.
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons 
|
|
|
|
|
25 June 2012, 04:14 AM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,152
|
Hmm... I own a 16610 and I would say the things I like most about the new Sub is the ceramic bezel and the new clasp/bracelet. What I don't like about the new Sub is the case changes made. I am very indifferent towards the maxi dial.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
