The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Yesterday, 08:48 AM   #1
Rahul718
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 43
Bergeon 7825 and Submariner - did I mess up the springbar hole?

Hey all,

So… I ordered the Bergeon 7825 tweezer. I’ve been using the 6767F with great results so far by taping up the lugs, but everyone has raved about the 7825 so I decided to buy it.

I practiced on a less nicer watch and it worked perfectly, so off I went to the Submariner Date. The technique I used was what all the tutorials said —> move the watch head away while keeping the end link stationary. I thought I did a good job, but apparently I did not. See the pictures. 2 photos at different angles of the same springbar hole.

It looks like I slightly dished out one of the lug holes. Does it look like the integrity of the lug hole is compromised or is it cosmetic only? Do I need to worry the springbar hole will only get bigger from here on out? Will the watch last or is the longevity compromised? Mostly just concerned about structural issues this might result in.

And please, no comments about how I should I have taken it to a professional. I already feel bad enough. I’ve been using springbar tools for a very long time with hardly ever any issues as a result. This was just being new to the 7825 tweezer, even after I had practiced on another watch.

Appreciate any feedback
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg IMG_2574.jpeg (224.4 KB, 216 views)
File Type: jpeg IMG_2573.jpeg (212.3 KB, 214 views)
Rahul718 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 09:40 AM   #2
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,362
I wouldn't worry about the lug hole, but it looks like there might be a chip out of the actual lug, just northwest of the hole. (Also not really concerning, though).
__________________
_______________________
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 09:40 AM   #3
Gearjockey
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 327
I wouldn’t be that concerned with lug hole.
It’s the LUG I’m interested in. You will see that with bracelet installed.
Gearjockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 09:43 AM   #4
physicist
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 203
Finish the operation you were in the process of completing and forget about it.
physicist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 09:43 AM   #5
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,049
I suspect that the true point of this thread is to show the great macro-photos.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 09:55 AM   #6
Walster
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Florida Keys
Posts: 148
I would not worry about the integrity of the spring bar hole.

But I’m more curious about the actual hole. It appears that there is a bushing or bearing inserted into the hole. Wonder if that is a replaceable item by RSC??

Would love to hear from Bas on this.
Walster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:06 AM   #7
BillA
2024 Pledge Member
 
BillA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,616
Huh?
BillA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:42 AM   #8
Kreyzhorse
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: NKY
Watch: "05" Air-King
Posts: 1,044
Done is done. Move it on and forget about it.
Kreyzhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:55 AM   #9
dg8dg7
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: CA
Posts: 49
No concerns whatsoever to integrity or longevity, so don't fret at all.

Honestly, happens to everyone an those tweezers do take some time to get used to - sometimes the pins still slip from the tips, so it happens. Don't worry about it and enjoy the watch!

Sent from my SM-S916W using Tapatalk
dg8dg7 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:56 AM   #10
omar-rye
"TRF" Member
 
omar-rye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Underground
Posts: 2,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rahul718 View Post
Does it look like the integrity of the lug hole is compromised or is it cosmetic only? Do I need to worry the springbar hole will only get bigger from here on out? Will the watch last or is the longevity compromised?
No, no, and nothings compromised.
omar-rye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 12:16 PM   #11
KatGirl
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
 
KatGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: Northern Ca, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 5,434
“Fuhgedaboudit!” You’re fine.

Kat


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
KatGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 12:54 PM   #12
SaddleSC
"TRF" Member
 
SaddleSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,125
Were you installing the end link from the top of the lug, rather than from the bottom side of the watch? The spring bar hole is not compromised, but it looks like you took a heck of a ding out of the top of the lug, which would be visible with the bracelet installed...that would drive me absolutely crazy!
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB
SaddleSC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 07:46 PM   #13
Scottyboy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: UK
Watch: GP Laureato
Posts: 134
If a tree falls in the woods and nobody was there to see or hear it, did it even happen?

Apply that here OP... once the bracelet or strap is on you will never know this even happened.
Scottyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:02 PM   #14
Rahul718
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 43
Thanks to all who commented. No, the bracelet was removed from the back of the watch, never from the top. I’m glad to hear that I didn’t compromise the lug hole. I’ve had watches where, over time, the lug holes got “worn” anyway, even when the bracelet was never even removed, so maybe I should just look at this as just some expedited wear and tear.

And yes, of course when the bracelet goes back on this isn’t noticeable. But if it wasn’t clear before, it’s not really the cosmetics that bother me, but what this damage means long term in the sense of functionality (ie, will I need a new case, will the hole get bigger now, do I need to get it laser welded). Otherwise, I’m completely fine with scratches and dings :)

Another pic just because I forgot to share it prior
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg IMG_2578.jpeg (145.7 KB, 0 views)
Rahul718 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:50 PM   #15
Gearjockey
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 327
Still would like to see a pic from top of lug, looking at face of watch where it meets end link.
Please
Gearjockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 02:20 AM   #16
Rahul718
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gearjockey View Post
Still would like to see a pic from top of lug, looking at face of watch where it meets end link.
Please
It’s not very noticeable. Here it is. With the bracelet on, it’s not noticeable at all without a loupe
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg IMG_2583.jpeg (143.6 KB, 0 views)
Rahul718 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 03:08 AM   #17
DavidSB
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
I suspect that the true point of this thread is to show the great macro-photos.
How are you taking the photos? What equipment/setup?
DavidSB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 04:22 AM   #18
Gearjockey
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 327
Probably an electron microscope.

It doesn’t look as bad as I thought. Leave it alone
Gearjockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 04:32 AM   #19
Rahul718
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 43
Guys it’s literally just a new IPhone lol. I zoomed in 3x and bam
Rahul718 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 05:44 AM   #20
worldofoyster
"TRF" Member
 
worldofoyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: Vincent
Location: 215
Watch: SS Sub
Posts: 1,766
it looks fine, nothing to worry
worldofoyster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.