ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 March 2018, 08:27 PM | #61 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,671
|
Quote:
__________________
The King of Cool. |
|
18 March 2018, 09:15 PM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 252
|
Nice to have a crystal ball I guess.
2 quotes here, one I agree with, one I don't, but all just opinions, nothing more, no-one actually knows. |
19 March 2018, 01:44 AM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Watch: where do i start??
Posts: 3,254
|
in regards to this thread, I think the only thing all of us can do is look at the trends over the years, to help gauge what "might" happen. But we also need to prepare for the worst as well. We can look at these trends and have answers to the "why".
stamps, comic books, pocket watches, bubble backs, are just a few examples of things that were extremely hot and important, but today, not so much. For example: less people collect stamps today which is why there isn't much of a market. I personally feel that great and historically important examples will always remain valuable and important no matter the market. You can apply this to any luxury collectable. I think moving forward to the next generation of collectors; it's human nature to yearn for luxury item's.. There will always be things like jewelry (watches included) cars, houses, boats, planes etc that are status symbols. As long as these luxury company's continue to evolve with the times, they will always remain relevant and important. The real question is, when these company's evolve with the times, what will that do to the counterparts desirability? No one knows. However, I have a theory. In the early days, rolex was experimenting with the market and with many different models that are no longer made. Today, Rolex is an established powerhouse that has it's foundations settled. They stick to their roots and keep to their classic and timeless designs. When they make a change or an update, they are so small, sometimes we cannot even see the change. This is why rolex has remained so strong. This includes all the valuable vintage sports models we speak of today. These vintage sports models are the golden era of rolex design, that is why rolex holds their designs so close to this day. So with that being said, how could these 1680's 5513's 1675's etc. etc. ever become irrelevant? Unless rolex stops producing submariners, I am not ever going to worry about my vintage subs.. Just my thoughts on the matter, but not fact by any means. |
1 April 2018, 02:26 PM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10
|
There are so many better and more interesting ways to invest than a watch. And I say that as a watch collector.
A watch should come last, meaning after you’ve put a ton of money away into your retirement fund that will allow you to retire early and well. After putting enough into your kids’ 529 that will allow them to go to the most overpriced private colleges. After real estate. Even after angel investing in that startup that wants to be the next Uber for (fill in the blank). I think only after you’ve spent your year’s money in all those investments should you “invest” in a Rolex watch. Cover those other bases first. It is after all a luxury item. And even then, just buy it to enjoy it. That is the luxury, that you spend this enormous amount of money on something that may or may not retain its value. Having said all that, rarity and condition I think are the biggest factors for future value potential. Later Rolex that’s been mass produced at modern volumes will be at a disadvantage. Stuff in bad condition may not pan out if charming patina falls out of taste. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
2 April 2018, 01:05 AM | #65 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Watch: where do i start??
Posts: 3,254
|
Quote:
that's why these investment topics come up from time to time. |
|
2 April 2018, 01:08 AM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 6,006
|
Without a shadow of a doubt the references I covet will appreciate quicker than I can put the funds together to buy them... same old same old!
|
2 April 2018, 05:31 AM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SC, USA
Posts: 39
|
It would be cool if the mods made a poll of the references listed here. How do you guys go about pricing your vintage watches you are looking to buy? All I know to do is watch tons of ebay listings and look at private dealer pricing. There is obviously a lot of factors that makes price difficult to nail down with dial/hands/case condition etc.
|
2 April 2018, 09:54 PM | #68 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,671
|
Scientist have verified that this a communicable disease. Spread by posting on this forum. Sorry but there is no cure.
__________________
The King of Cool. Last edited by mountainjogger; 2 April 2018 at 09:54 PM.. Reason: Typo |
1 May 2018, 02:37 AM | #69 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 83
|
I think the 116520 is a tremendous buy right now if you're thinking Daytona.
|
1 May 2018, 03:38 AM | #70 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,027
|
Quote:
__________________
RCN (Canadian) Tudor Milsub database co-manager |
|
1 May 2018, 07:45 PM | #71 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Asia
Posts: 53
|
Quote:
I'm curious if the current 116500 is harder to find (vs 116520) in the grey market. The waiting list at ADs is quite insane. |
|
17 July 2019, 12:18 PM | #72 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1
|
Rootbeer
|
17 July 2019, 03:02 PM | #73 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Douglas
Location: London, UK & USA
Watch: Submariner 16610
Posts: 723
|
4 digit datejusts
|
18 July 2019, 01:29 AM | #74 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 421
|
16760....because I believe it has room to grow in value, thicker case than the popular 16710 and a shorter run time.
|
18 July 2019, 10:54 PM | #75 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Sweden
Posts: 67
|
Already own a few of the watches that has gone up in price beyond comprehension last couple of years. I just bought a four digit datejust. It´s the only model I´ve been thinking of buying lately. Not as investments but to use daily. As people getting more aware about the vintage prices of the 5513, 1665, 1675 and so on. The risk of getting the wrong kind of attention is higher than ever. I used to think you could walk around in a dressed down 5513. Those days are gone with all attention on social media. I wonder how long it takes when you no longer can dress down a 1601. I actually hope that the prices don´t move any more. I could not care less if they dropped. Than people could use them for what they are and really appreciate them. I never bought any of the vintage Rolex as investments. More like something you could use, and still get your money back more or less after a few years instead of having the money on an savings account. In those days most people bought the newest model they could find or a fake. The only fake watch of vintage models where the Paul Newman Daytona era Daytonas. Apart from that you never knew if people you met had a real Rolex of the fake version of one.
|
18 July 2019, 11:12 PM | #76 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Lots
Posts: 4,349
|
Quote:
__________________
DSSD is the king of all Rolex |
|
19 July 2019, 12:14 AM | #77 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
|
More importantly, the first GMT II.
|
19 July 2019, 02:22 AM | #78 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Dave
Location: Unknown
Posts: 999
|
I agree with the "buy what you like and forget about investment" viewpoint. The truth is that no one knows what the future values will be like. In the end, everything is only worth what others are willing to pay for it.
As another poster said, values of collectibles are often highly correlated to one's generation. As an example, I have a baseball card collection from my pre-teens that I thought I'd sell for a fortune one day. I recently looked into what they're worth, and they're worth about the same as they were in the '80s, and that doesn't take into account inflation! Younger generations just aren't that interested in them. Another example is cars, which are also items that you can enjoy and that can increase in value. Pre-WW2 cars used to be worth a lot more, but then the guys who really like them (those who remembered them from their childhoods) passed on. Same for '60s muscle cars. Watch Barrett-Jackson auctions and see who's buying those cars -- all Q-tips. IMO, if you want an investment, go with a traditional investment vehicle, like stocks, bonds, and real estate. If the watches you buy increase in value, great. Just don't count on them to do so for your retirement. |
19 July 2019, 03:05 AM | #79 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: uk
Posts: 355
|
I used to think you could walk around in a dressed down 5513. Those days are gone with all attention on social media
couldn't disagree more - nobody is looking at your watch, and watch geeks are a tiny percentage of the general population. |
19 July 2019, 04:02 AM | #80 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 2,237
|
Buy what you like and wait...
I paid $1225 for this in 2001 :) |
20 July 2019, 05:02 AM | #81 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: Emerald Island
Watch: 1962, 5512
Posts: 180
|
My two penny thoughts are:
Seadweller 116600 and Chromalight Daytona 116520. M |
14 December 2019, 02:38 PM | #82 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 148
|
I think if we look back to the start of this thread and note the date (March 18) compared to now (Dec 19) the 16601LV has probably increased the most and continues to do so.
|
14 December 2019, 04:21 PM | #83 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
6263 are undervalued. Although John Mayer does own one.
|
14 December 2019, 09:21 PM | #85 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,671
|
Quote:
__________________
The King of Cool. |
|
14 December 2019, 09:29 PM | #86 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
|
The big reason they are outdated is the size. A lot will have to change to make 30-32mm watches hot again. Even if trends are important I think sizes between 36-40mm are fairly safe. If bubblebacks were bigger they would still cost money. They are just not wearable for a normal person.
__________________
Instagram: @perj123 |
15 December 2019, 02:02 AM | #87 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,568
|
Best Vintage Rolex Investment you should buy now.
I’m not making a case that vintage Rolex pieces are an investment but I foresee the problem for the market within which these pieces gain value and lose value alternatively.
I believe the gross market is capped by a relatively small amount of collectors (compared to the total market of Rolex buyers). When that happens money will move between choices with some selling of less attractive pieces below the highs they had reached earlier. This is the case for bubbleback retreating due to collectors cashing in their gains on them to fund acquisition of the current “hot buys”. If the market had new money coming in, then highs across the board could be possible. But I believe it is a relatively closed system of selling/buying. As a result, and with inventories being fixed, values respond in a highly correlated elastic manner. This is unlike a market with many new entrants where prices can respond differently. Going back to bubblebacks for a minute... It might be possible to float their values upward without diluting the values of other vintage models. I agree their size currently hurts values among the collectors who are, by-and-large, male. But if a female luminary began sporting a few of them, and doing an interview here or there about their historic connections - then it might drag in a lot of new money because the size isn’t as much of an issue. I call that type of new money phenomenon the :BTC: Bitcoin effect. :BTC: brought many new buyers into a market who weren’t commodity, currency or equity investors. The new entrants had just been consumers spending wads of cash on millennial toys and baubles. The value of other products in the currency markets didn’t dip a jot due to the new :BTC: buyers because that market’s long entrenched investors/speculators/hedgers stayed put within their comfort zone on existing products. So bubbleback owners may still see gains if some influencer decides to flaunt/hype them online. “Calling All Kardashians” may be your best strategy! All just my 2¢ (yeah, ¢ - no :BTC: in my pocket) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
15 December 2019, 02:13 AM | #88 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
|
Quote:
The sport watches have really not changed that much since they first came out. |
|
15 December 2019, 02:40 AM | #89 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
|
Overall watches as an investment is only valid on a very high level where objects are truly rare. Buying what most of us have and enjoy shouldn’t be looked at as investments. These watches are available in high volumes and prices can shift in any direction depending on trends and finacial cycles.
There’s a huge difference in investment potential buying a perfect big crown or buying a perfect matte sports model. Even looking at the vintage Daytona market it is clear that uniqueness is what drives value. A PN Daytona is still very common and this is why prices have fallen back quite a lot from previous levels.
__________________
Instagram: @perj123 |
15 December 2019, 05:17 AM | #90 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,443
|
You still can't go wrong with a perfect 6263...just go for the great ones, not the ok ones if you care about investment. Many contemporary celebs have them as well so they should continue to remain popular for a while. I feel like some of the subs and GMTs can get lost once they get really expensive.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.