ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 September 2010, 12:46 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Carlos
Location: UK
Watch: ing YOU!
Posts: 1,121
|
Wear and tear for manual winding ?
Panerai noobie here.....
I have been really intrigue and in the verge of finally joining the dark side.. I do have one question for veteran ristis. Do the manual winding Pams like 000 easily suffers from wear and tear due to the frequency of manual winding? Are they recommended to be service every 5yrs like Rolex ? As of now I am planning to get one for weekend wear. So I expect to only wind it like once a week. Experiences from other manual owners?
__________________
16610 116400GV 116520W 00112 116710LN 16610LV 00292 116520B |
12 September 2010, 09:20 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Watch: GS Snowflake
Posts: 314
|
I would say the whether it is wound automatically or manually makes no difference, just make sure you release the winder lever!
|
12 September 2010, 11:09 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,577
|
I also have a PAM 000 for weekend warrior duties. So far the only "incident" I have had is where I think the gears somehow got stuck when I tried to set the time and it wouldn't move "forward" or "backwards". I think what happend was I did not pull out the crown properly and it was "inbetween" if you know what I mean. I am very careful now of pulling the crown out to the proper notch.
The zero is also really quick and easy to set on the weekends since you don't have the date, you simply have to set the time, and wind and then off you go.
__________________
Omega Panerai Chopard Grand Seiko |
13 September 2010, 01:51 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
No, you're good. I manually wind my 312 quite often, they're made for it. It's no different than manual wind watches made back in the day, where they were required to be wound daily. No harm...
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
13 September 2010, 09:08 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Carlos
Location: UK
Watch: ing YOU!
Posts: 1,121
|
Thanks for the reply.
__________________
16610 116400GV 116520W 00112 116710LN 16610LV 00292 116520B |
13 September 2010, 12:05 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
You have to remember that mechanical watches were manual for many years before the the auto feature was made. These watches are built to be wound daily if needed, they can handle it for sure.
__________________
My grails: |
14 September 2010, 02:13 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,695
|
Quote:
Is the winder lever supposed to flop around when you wind your PAM? I only release the lever when setting the time :-/ Leaving the lever open seems like a bad design. Mine has been working fine / without the lever open. |
|
14 September 2010, 02:33 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
Quote:
Yes, you should always release the lever when turning the crown....
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
|
14 September 2010, 02:57 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,886
|
I ALWAYS release the lever (unlock the crown) before winding
let's look at this way. the lever press against the crown and create pressure. if you are winding it with the lever in locked position, that will increase wear and tear between the lever and the crown and then its the water tight seals. the crown is pressed against the seals (gaskets) to make it water resistant. if you wind it with the crown pressed against the seals, then will increase the wear and tear with the seals. it won't break anything with winding the watch with crown locked. but i wouldn't want to do it too often though. Frank |
14 September 2010, 03:04 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Elijah
Location: Midwest
Watch: 124060
Posts: 216
|
My understanding is that there is no association between manual winding and additional wear and tear, as this is what the watch was designed for. Whether winding clockwise or counter, I am sure the designers of these wonderful time pieces have taken this into consideration. As far as service goes I would get it serviced regularly, just as you would with any machine.
|
14 September 2010, 06:46 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: DC
Watch: 16600, PAM112,EZM1
Posts: 463
|
In the Omega section on timesone, some guy wound all his autos every day. Turned out that several of them needed repair to the stem or something like that. Omega told him that auto-wind watches should not be wound every day due to excessive wear. A watch repair person commented on the thread that Omega was correct. Autos are meant to be wound occasionally and manuals every day. It might be hard to find that thread again, not sure what key word to use to search, but it was an eye-opening thread to many.
|
14 September 2010, 07:39 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
|
14 September 2010, 08:27 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
Quote:
This doesn't make any sense to me. There's no reason a winding mechanism would be built any different on an auto vs. a non-auto watch. I've never heard that winding an auto every day would somehow be bad for it. I'm sure others would concur....
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
|
14 September 2010, 09:25 AM | #14 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 351
|
Quote:
It seems the winding parts (stem, crown assembly) are built stronger. |
|
14 September 2010, 09:54 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
Quote:
I've owned a 190 and also have a BP (automatic) and they both feel adequately well built and great for manual winding...
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
|
14 September 2010, 12:31 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,443
|
winding up manual wind watches have no effect on durability. service interval is the same 5-7 years. (they only calibrated my winding system but still charged me for the works.)
since i dont use my pam112 everyday, i let power reserve die then set the time then give it a full wind again. |
14 September 2010, 12:53 PM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,695
|
Quote:
Just wound up the 111 as directed. I have to say it feels weird with the lever flapping around...Now if it had a setting where it would sit closer to the crown guard whilst winding. |
|
14 September 2010, 12:57 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,443
|
dont wind with the crown guard closed. youll break the seals and the winding mechanism
|
14 September 2010, 02:37 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,695
|
Got it.
Thanks! |
14 September 2010, 11:23 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Carlos
Location: UK
Watch: ing YOU!
Posts: 1,121
|
Haven't visited this thread since yesterday and glad to be back with a lot of nice inputs from friendly members
__________________
16610 116400GV 116520W 00112 116710LN 16610LV 00292 116520B |
15 September 2010, 07:02 AM | #21 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,873
|
I just looked at a manual wind ETA6497-1 stem (same as PAM stem) and the stem is 8mm thick. In comparison, the stem on an ETA2836-2 automatic movement is 6mm thick. I think the discussion has less to do with manual vs auto and more to do with the relative sizes of watch parts. It stands to reason that an 8mm piece of metal is a little more robust than a 6mm part - sort of like comparing a 1.4mm vs a 1.2mm screwdriver. Does that imply that the 6mm can't/shouldn't be hand wound? Not at all... but keep in mind that the (6497 based) PAM movements were pocket watch engines and engineered to withstand the torque/wear of repeated windings. The referenced Omega (mostly ETA movements) is probably similar to the ETA2836-2 stem so it's smaller and more care should be taken in handling it. Regardless, modern stems are pretty robust so I wouldn't worry about it and just replace the stem (based on wear) at each service interval (just as you would any other worn part).
|
15 September 2010, 07:57 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: DC
Watch: 16600, PAM112,EZM1
Posts: 463
|
I found the thread where the guy was winding his autos everyday. Take a look and comment whether it makes sense. In the end the only people who really know are master watchmakers and experienced repairpersons.
http://forums.timezone.com/index.php...73#msg_5028518 |
15 September 2010, 08:48 AM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
Quote:
This is quite an interesting thread, thanks for sharing it. I'm going to post it over on the Rolex side and gather opinions...
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
|
15 September 2010, 09:15 AM | #24 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Elijah
Location: Midwest
Watch: 124060
Posts: 216
|
Hope this helps!
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=42091 |
15 September 2010, 01:46 PM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,443
|
Quote:
so the "too much winding of the stem" problem should not be the case unless it wasnt done properly. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.