ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 January 2012, 07:31 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Greg
Location: brasil
Watch: Pam 312 - Pam 390
Posts: 31
|
Trip to Miami
Hey guys, I am going out on vacation to Miami next month and would like to have your thoughts on PAM 005, 112 and 111. I am considering on buying one of them, but not sure each way to go.
|
15 January 2012, 08:58 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Daz
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 214
|
id go 111
:) Daz
__________________
Rolex / 116610, 116710, 116713, 116613 x 2 / AP ROO Panda 44 / AP LBJ / Panerai Pam 321 Pam 312 " If your Important People will wait " |
15 January 2012, 09:11 PM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,430
|
I've owned all three. Out of all listed watches, I kept the 111. Second hand, sandwich dial, and sapphire display caseback helped me made my decision. Good luck to you!
|
15 January 2012, 09:26 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 880
|
+1 another vote for the 111...
__________________
Lange 1815 Chrono, AP ROO 26470ST, RO 26230ST, Rolex 216570 (w), 116600, 116520 (w), IWC XV, PAM 366, 420, Omega 311.30.42.30.01.005, Seiko SKX007J, Apple Watch, a bunch of G-Shocks ------------------------------------------------------------- |
15 January 2012, 11:20 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
111 for sure - but note that it does not hack (nor do the others)
__________________
|
15 January 2012, 11:52 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,149
|
111
|
16 January 2012, 12:10 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 3,391
|
One more vote for the 111.
|
16 January 2012, 02:42 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
All great choices.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
16 January 2012, 02:55 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: John
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42
Posts: 1,654
|
111 for me
__________________
John Submariner C LN Explorer 42 Polar |
16 January 2012, 03:51 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
111 or 112 for me...
|
16 January 2012, 05:22 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Canada
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 1,019
|
Easy decision, 111 :)
|
16 January 2012, 08:25 AM | #12 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,397
|
111
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
16 January 2012, 10:03 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Jakarta
Watch: Sub 116610-PAM321
Posts: 63
|
Try them om. I was in your position trying to decide which one is the best I like. Initially I like 111 but throughout the time after trying both couple at several times, I can see also the beauty of 112 which 111 does not have. Try them on and see what you want most
|
16 January 2012, 01:11 PM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,870
|
I've owned all but the 112. I love the OP logo, solid back, and sausage dials so 005 gets my vote.
|
17 January 2012, 10:45 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Carolina
Watch: GMT II BLNR
Posts: 40
|
Definitely try them all on. I was set on the 111, but ended up going with the 005 after trying them all on at the same time. Can't go wrong with any of them.
|
18 January 2012, 07:46 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Chad
Location: Canada
Posts: 279
|
proud 005 owner here!
|
18 January 2012, 12:28 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Nate
Location: Pottsville, PA
Watch: Sub-c LV, GMT's
Posts: 988
|
111 for me!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.