The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex Watch Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 August 2018, 01:13 PM   #1
StuartM1970
"TRF" Member
 
StuartM1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Stuart
Location: Dubai
Watch: IWC Mark XV
Posts: 280
Tudor Black Bay GMT detailed review on Hodinkee

https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/tu...bay-gmt-review

Worth a read if you like this kind of thing. Oh so terribly earnest though.
StuartM1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2018, 01:35 PM   #2
jspjmma
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 63
Thanks. Great read. I was wearing my Tudor GMT today as a matter of fact! Great watch.
jspjmma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2018, 03:18 PM   #3
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,475
Nice pictures.

But, the “article” felt more like paid advertising with a touch of “too thick!” thrown in to keep their “credibility”. It’s always entertaining to see Hodinkee writers squirm to say positive things about a watch that doesn’t fit their ideal mold of 34-36mm, thin, delicate and vintage.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2018, 04:31 PM   #4
Wools
"TRF" Member
 
Wools's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 374
Read it last night, great review.

Love a long form review where the reviewer has clearly given it a lot of thought, rather than it ‘sings to me’ and it’s the best watch ever!
Wools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2018, 09:43 PM   #5
ajas
"TRF" Member
 
ajas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Will
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: SubC, Pam, Speede
Posts: 3,140
Great review. Kudos to James.

Sent from my SM-N935F using Tapatalk
ajas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2018, 09:46 PM   #6
ezhukov
"TRF" Member
 
ezhukov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Eugene
Location: Manila
Posts: 70
I thought it was a fair review
ezhukov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2018, 10:11 PM   #7
ytsethunder
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
Nice pictures.

But, the “article” felt more like paid advertising with a touch of “too thick!” thrown in to keep their “credibility”. It’s always entertaining to see Hodinkee writers squirm to say positive things about a watch that doesn’t fit their ideal mold of 34-36mm, thin, delicate and vintage.


Don’t think this is entirely fair, but I will say this: the comment on the watch being too heavy on the bracelet was dismissed as being because the author favours straps. Being a Black Bay owner, the things could definitely do with being 30g lighter - and they’re top heavy to boot (even on bracelet). I feel more criticism could be levelled here.

It’s interesting seeing that Tudor is a major sponsor of HODINKEE (prominent on web, in app and in podcast). I don’t doubt there is a definitive separation between sales and editorial, but do wonder if true objectivity is possible given the situation. Would be interesting to hear the author’s take on this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ytsethunder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2018, 10:59 PM   #8
StuartM1970
"TRF" Member
 
StuartM1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Stuart
Location: Dubai
Watch: IWC Mark XV
Posts: 280
well said on both counts

Quote:
Originally Posted by ytsethunder View Post
Don’t think this is entirely fair, but I will say this: the comment on the watch being too heavy on the bracelet was dismissed as being because the author favours straps. Being a Black Bay owner, the things could definitely do with being 30g lighter - and they’re top heavy to boot (even on bracelet). I feel more criticism could be levelled here.

It’s interesting seeing that Tudor is a major sponsor of HODINKEE (prominent on web, in app and in podcast). I don’t doubt there is a definitive separation between sales and editorial, but do wonder if true objectivity is possible given the situation. Would be interesting to hear the author’s take on this.
I tried a Black Bay on for the first time this morning. I noticed the weight.
Editorially I think Hodinkee is putting itself in a difficult - if commercially successful - place. Take Oris for example. They sell Oris brand watches from the site and carry Oris brand advertising. I feel it unlikely that this doesn't influence the editorial placement of Oris watches, especially on 'pick' lists. So Tudor is not the only example.

Also, the journalism is predominantly of the opinion variety. So while it may be thorough, considered and earnest, it cannot really be objective. Still, you've gotta make a buck, right?
StuartM1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2018, 11:34 PM   #9
1William
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 44,671
I am an owner of the Black Bay GMT and found the article to be informative. I always read the reviews with a grain of salt knowing that the watch companies do advertise on a lot of these sites and some even sell. No issue there if the articles are objective and deal with specifics. I do not find the Black Bay to be too thick nor too large but I have a 7.75 wrist. I almost always read the case is too thick, to who, is my question. I think most of the reviews give us a good starting point to understand a watch or brand but go see for yourself and compare watches of similar prices and specifications.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 August 2018, 05:04 AM   #10
ytsethunder
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by StuartM1970 View Post

Also, the journalism is predominantly of the opinion variety. So while it may be thorough, considered and earnest, it cannot really be objective. Still, you've gotta make a buck, right?

Important point and you’re spot on - HODINKEE is a blog, first and foremost. Top quality blog, but a blog nonetheless.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ytsethunder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 August 2018, 10:13 AM   #11
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
“Black bay gmt 58 would be bonkers”

Agree with that comment
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.