ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
31 March 2020, 09:08 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Cleveland
Watch: GMT 16750
Posts: 212
|
Vintage Submariner - Date with no cyclops?
Was there a authentic vintage Submariner that had the date feature but no cyclop? Sorry if this is a rookie question. Thanks in advance!
|
31 March 2020, 09:12 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,583
|
No only the sea dweller
|
31 March 2020, 09:23 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,841
|
Although not original, it's not uncommon to find a non-cyclops crystal on a Sub with date. Some people like the look.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
31 March 2020, 09:25 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,652
|
|
31 March 2020, 09:35 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Cleveland
Watch: GMT 16750
Posts: 212
|
Thanks everyone. Love that look FTX!!!
|
31 March 2020, 09:36 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,652
|
|
1 April 2020, 04:10 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Real Name: NotRyan?
Location: Chicago
Watch: Daytona 16520
Posts: 114
|
Crystal could have been replaced with non-OEM or I have heard that people could remove the cyclops with a blow dryer and a steady hand. Some people preferred the smooth, clean look.
__________________
16800 Matte | 16750 No-Date | 16550 Polar | 16520 White Inverted 6 | 1601 Linen Sigma |
1 April 2020, 08:00 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: John
Location: Midwest
Watch: 5513,1675,216570
Posts: 1,465
|
Is the cyclops on a plastic crystal part of the mold or is it a separate glued on piece?
|
1 April 2020, 08:08 AM | #9 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: 1966 Rolex 5513
Posts: 3,407
|
Quote:
Plexi crystals are prone to warping and melting under height heat. ...trust me on that. |
|
2 April 2020, 05:08 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 353
|
Quote:
Considering this, it does not mean it can not be removed but the process would be, IMHO, a bit different from what is written above :) What you usually see when looking at 1680 without cyclop is basically a 5513 glass. Kind regards, |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.