The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Ω Omega Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 January 2022, 11:58 PM   #91
Henry.hoe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Singapore
Posts: 46
I am just satisfied with my stainless steel 321.not willing to pay that outrageous price just for the Canopus gold and ornx dial.
Henry.hoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2022, 04:50 AM   #92
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 25,997
Some talk here about omega compete ig with Rolex.

Imho the speedy dial is the best chrono dial made, so where is the issue?

Lack of water resistance. Why is this a hurdle for omega?
Thickness of case and movement a bit more complicated as the Lemania is so tied to omegas history.

Until these two issues are sorted, omega will never take the lead.
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2022, 05:05 AM   #93
GB-man
2024 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,866
I think there’s just too many modern speedies out there for them to ever become highly coveted. I also believe the 321 will fall back to msrp in time. Agree the dial is one of the absolute best. I wish all chronos were 12 hours. I love being able to time longer events.
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2022, 05:13 AM   #94
logo
"TRF" Member
 
logo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: North America
Posts: 2,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by subtona View Post
Some talk here about omega compete ig with Rolex.

Imho the speedy dial is the best chrono dial made, so where is the issue?

Lack of water resistance. Why is this a hurdle for omega?
Thickness of case and movement a bit more complicated as the Lemania is so tied to omegas history.

Until these two issues are sorted, omega will never take the lead.
I would argue the water resistance thing is a perceived barrier for buyers, but in reality 50m is plenty for 99% of what people do with their watches.

Ultimately I think it's simply buyer's perceived brand status vs anything tangible, but I would say that Omega's persistence on releasing 30 versions of the same watch sort of dilutes interest - if there were just 3 or 4 speedmasters, demand would be higher for each rather than people diversifying to one of 30.
logo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2022, 05:15 AM   #95
logo
"TRF" Member
 
logo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: North America
Posts: 2,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
I think there’s just too many modern speedies out there for them to ever become highly coveted. I also believe the 321 will fall back to msrp in time. Agree the dial is one of the absolute best. I wish all chronos were 12 hours. I love being able to time longer events.
Agree, EXCEPT for ones that are limited production, either as special editions or ones where production is constrained, like the 321 models.
logo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2022, 05:25 AM   #96
HMHM
"TRF" Member
 
HMHM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: HM
Location: 🇲🇾
Posts: 2,357
I think under the right leadership, Omega can compete with Rolex. I don’t think Reynald is the man unfortunately. Omega has the history and a reasonable product line up (railmaster, seasmaster and Speedmaster). I’m not really sure why they are struggling to move watches at MSRP and often have to discount them to get the deal through. When I look at brands like Richard Mille getting more recognition (for right or wrong reasons) and being more coveted despite only being 21 years old, it’s really sad. Like people pointed above, too many variations of the same watch. Just the Speedmaster alone there’s the 3861 Professional, DSOTM, Snoopy, 321, chronoscope etc. Maybe it’s not Reynald’s fault - he seems like a nice guy and a genuine watch guy. Perhaps being under the Swatch group has led to what it is today.

I don’t water resistance is the issue. It’s a good thing to have but let’s face it - how many of us actually wear these watches to swim? I rather Omega stay true to the root of the Speedmaster - manual wound chronograph without the water resistance.
HMHM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2022, 03:03 PM   #97
macrowatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Posts: 4,365
Quote:
Originally Posted by HMHM View Post
I think under the right leadership, Omega can compete with Rolex. I don’t think Reynald is the man unfortunately. Omega has the history and a reasonable product line up (railmaster, seasmaster and Speedmaster). I’m not really sure why they are struggling to move watches at MSRP and often have to discount them to get the deal through. When I look at brands like Richard Mille getting more recognition (for right or wrong reasons) and being more coveted despite only being 21 years old, it’s really sad. Like people pointed above, too many variations of the same watch. Just the Speedmaster alone there’s the 3861 Professional, DSOTM, Snoopy, 321, chronoscope etc. Maybe it’s not Reynald’s fault - he seems like a nice guy and a genuine watch guy. Perhaps being under the Swatch group has led to what it is today.

I don’t water resistance is the issue. It’s a good thing to have but let’s face it - how many of us actually wear these watches to swim? I rather Omega stay true to the root of the Speedmaster - manual wound chronograph without the water resistance.
Gotta Steve Jobs the problem like the launch of iMac and huge culling of the product line!
macrowatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2022, 02:19 PM   #98
BNA/LION
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
BNA/LION's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Larry
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 25,206
Speedmaster 321 in Canopus Gold announced

I agree with you on this one too.

"Very cool watch actually...... But not at that price honestly."
__________________

✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ Daytona C 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ NEXT-->?
Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron.
BNA/LION is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2022, 08:18 PM   #99
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by HMHM View Post
I think under the right leadership, Omega can compete with Rolex. I don’t think Reynald is the man unfortunately. Omega has the history and a reasonable product line up (railmaster, seasmaster and Speedmaster). I’m not really sure why they are struggling to move watches at MSRP and often have to discount them to get the deal through. When I look at brands like Richard Mille getting more recognition (for right or wrong reasons) and being more coveted despite only being 21 years old, it’s really sad. Like people pointed above, too many variations of the same watch. Just the Speedmaster alone there’s the 3861 Professional, DSOTM, Snoopy, 321, chronoscope etc. Maybe it’s not Reynald’s fault - he seems like a nice guy and a genuine watch guy. Perhaps being under the Swatch group has led to what it is today.

I don’t water resistance is the issue. It’s a good thing to have but let’s face it - how many of us actually wear these watches to swim? I rather Omega stay true to the root of the Speedmaster - manual wound chronograph without the water resistance.


But, how many variations of the Daytona are there between SS, TT, PM and all the dials? And now Oyster-Flex as well? Many, many, many more variations than the LEs of Speedmasters....

All the stress about LEs is really overblown, IMHO. Omega makes many great watches, gives many options and, for the most part, makes the product available for seeing and buying. One can find what one likes and actually buy it. That's enough, IMHO, and preferable to constant hype, FOMO, no stock, insane grey prices.

As for RM, I'm not sure what that has to do with anything. Rolex isn't on RM level either....
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2022, 09:22 PM   #100
alllexandru
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
alllexandru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Old continent
Posts: 2,317
Anyone who place the order yet? I'm sure we will see one pop up here in next couple of months
alllexandru is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.